Hear Again
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2005
- Messages
- 20,114
- Reaction score
- 5
Why are you glorifying Clinton?
Because he was an excellent President. Better than most people give him credit for.
Why are you glorifying Clinton?
Do not even tell me about JFK. It's a joke.
Because he was an excellent President. Better than most people give him credit for.

Yep and he was to me.![]()

Lest you forget, Republican Presidents also initiated wars of their own:
Civil War -- Abraham Lincoln
Korea -- Ulysses S. Grant
Spanish/American War and Phillipine Insurrection -- William McKinley
Nicaragua -- Calvin Coolidge
Grenada -- Ronald Reagan
Panama, Persian Gulf War -- George H. W. Bush
Desert Storm -- George H. W. Bush
Afghanistan and Iraq 2001-present -- George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush
We need another Bill Clinton. Hopefully the Obama Administration will mirror that of the Clinton Administration.
America needs that and we need it now.
I see.... so you only care about "deaths." Just because nobody died from Clinton's lie doesn't mean he's any better than Bush. He was an embarrassment to our country. Again - it's understandable that booming economy and surplus budget shined Bill Clinton so bright that you can't see his flaws in national security and military conflicts.
How convenient of you to turn a blind eye on any lies.... as long as nobody gets hurt (or died).
Because he was an excellent President. Better than most people give him credit for.
yes. He's no better than Bush in military conflicts. Both made poor judgments. Both lack military experience.
Why are you glorifying Clinton?
Please read my post again. I compared Clinton's speech about Iraq to Bush's speech about Iraq. I didn't mention BosniaThere're nothing to compare between Bosnia and Iraq war because they are TOTAL different.
WRONG! I want another Franklin D. Roosevelt. He is the great ever!

You're obviously in the minority when it comes to thinking the JFK presidency was a joke. Many people (including myself) thought JFK was a great President for many reasons. It's a shame his life had to be cut short after being assassinated in 1963.
Lest you forget, Republican Presidents also initiated wars of their own:
Civil War -- Abraham Lincoln
Korea -- Ulysses S. Grant
Spanish/American War and Phillipine Insurrection -- William McKinley
Nicaragua -- Calvin Coolidge
Grenada -- Ronald Reagan
Panama, Persian Gulf War -- George H. W. Bush
Desert Storm -- George H. W. Bush
Afghanistan and Iraq 2001-present -- George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush
Are you saying that they both lied about Iraq but one didn't follow up with action and the other one did?Yes, but the difference between Clinton and Bush is that Clinton did not choose to engage in a war against Iraq.
Korea - Ulysses S. Grant? WTF? You're not quality to argue until you get history lesson completed.
Are you saying that they both lied about Iraq but one didn't follow up with action and the other one did?
Are you saying that they both lied about Iraq but one didn't follow up with action and the other one did?
Actually, Clinton attacked Iraq in 1998 to avoid Iraqi aggression against the U.S.
However, in the case of Bush, there was no basis to invade Iraq given the fact that there were no WMDs and no proof that they were responsible for 9/11.
and don't forget that under Clinton Administration - the government (Pentagon, military, and CIA) had to "MAKE DO" with severe budget cut and reductions of personnel because Clinton emphasized on technology (satellites) and not spies.... and this led to weak intelligence capability... which led to terrorist attacks on USA....
short story - he left an impossible mess for Bush Administration with inevitable consequence.