- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
clarification - straight men could be aroused by spanking girls = rapists
Mom Angry That Male Vice Principal Spanked Her Daughter
- Thread starter rockin'robin
- Start date
clarification - straight men could be aroused by spanking girls = rapists
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
it's based on common sense.
Can I have a turn to ask you a question then? You do not have any problem with a male TSA agent doing enhanced pat-down on your daughter, right?
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 7
Still not an answer.... we can just move on.
Yup.
Post 79
-------------------------------
Quote: Originally Posted by Reba
What do you call it to think that a straight male would be sexually aroused with any females?
Quote: Originally Posted by Jiro
rapist.
Quote: Originally Posted by Reba
That means you would equally believe that a straight female TSA agent would not get aroused while patting you down. Right?
Quote: Originally Posted by Jiro
A straight female TSA agent does not have same body parts as I do... therefore inappropriate. I'll stick with physicality, not mentality. I'm not interested in thought policing.
It's very simple. If a homosexual TSA agent was doing his job professionally and patting me down, no problem. If a homosexual TSA agent was accosting me, then I will report him.
__________________
- Don't forget to buy Jiro's Special Edition Sunglasses for $19.95
----------------------------
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 7
Yes, a very strange answer.....
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
I don't know what kind of answer you're looking for.
sure.
can I have a turn to ask you a question then? You do not have any problem with a male TSA agent doing enhanced pat-down on your daughter, right?
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
I don't see how is it strange to think a female TSA agent would be sexually aroused to pat me down.
I don't think that way. only that it's inappropriate. simple as that.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 7
The answer I am seeking is a direct one. Why do you feel it is"extremely innappropriate'" for school paddlings to occur between opposite sexes?
I don't find your question relevant to this thread, lets stay on topic.
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,903
- Reaction score
- 1,518
That doesn't make sense.
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,903
- Reaction score
- 1,518
So you call the person who accuses heterosexual men of getting aroused by spanking girls to be a rapist? The person making the accusation? That doesn't make any sense.
rockin'robin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
- Messages
- 24,433
- Reaction score
- 544
Not asking me, but it is extremely innappropraite...the same as for letting an uncle, step-father, brother spank ur child, even tho' they are family members...Especially on a 13 yr. old girl....say what?...
Hands Off! my child...it's the parents responsibility to dole out the punishment, not some stranger such as a vice principal.
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,903
- Reaction score
- 1,518
Except that wasn't the question. We were discussing what you call the persons who make the accusations.
Quote: Originally Posted by Reba
You still aren't understanding the question.
Quote: Originally Posted by Jiro
You are not understanding my answer and you are snaking your way around.
Quote: Originally Posted by Reba
You called people who think that homosexual men could be aroused by spanking boys, "sad ignorance and homophobic."
So, what do you call people who think that straight men could be aroused by spanking girls?
Quote: Originally Posted by Jiro
You are focusing on sexual orientation. I am focusing on gender. Sexual orientation is illegal. Improper sexual conduct is illegal.
If a straight man was sexually aroused by spanking a girl, that's illegal.
If a straight man was spanking a girl, that's against the policy.
If a homosexual man was sexually aroused by spanking a boy, that's illegal.
If a homosexual man was spanking a boy, that's within the policy.
If a person believes it is ok for a straight man to spank a boy... that's fine.
If a person believes it is not ok for a homosexual man to spank a boy because of some sexual arousal... that's homophobic and ignorant.
Like __________________
- Don't forget to buy Jiro's Special Edition Sunglasses for $19.95
Care to explain the differences between the two highlighted (in red) statements? If I'm understanding you correctly, you are saying it's illegal for a homosexual male to be aroused while spanking a boy, and that its homophobic and ignorant to assume a homosexual male will be aroused while spanking a boy.
You still aren't understanding the question.
Quote: Originally Posted by Jiro
You are not understanding my answer and you are snaking your way around.
Quote: Originally Posted by Reba
You called people who think that homosexual men could be aroused by spanking boys, "sad ignorance and homophobic."
So, what do you call people who think that straight men could be aroused by spanking girls?
Quote: Originally Posted by Jiro
You are focusing on sexual orientation. I am focusing on gender. Sexual orientation is illegal. Improper sexual conduct is illegal.
If a straight man was sexually aroused by spanking a girl, that's illegal.
If a straight man was spanking a girl, that's against the policy.
If a homosexual man was sexually aroused by spanking a boy, that's illegal.
If a homosexual man was spanking a boy, that's within the policy.
If a person believes it is ok for a straight man to spank a boy... that's fine.
If a person believes it is not ok for a homosexual man to spank a boy because of some sexual arousal... that's homophobic and ignorant.
Like __________________
- Don't forget to buy Jiro's Special Edition Sunglasses for $19.95
Care to explain the differences between the two highlighted (in red) statements? If I'm understanding you correctly, you are saying it's illegal for a homosexual male to be aroused while spanking a boy, and that its homophobic and ignorant to assume a homosexual male will be aroused while spanking a boy.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 7
Strange because that is not what Reba asked...
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
How convenient. We were discussing about some TSA agents and homosexual males when in fact these parts are not relevant in this thread.... and you refused to answer this question is precisely why we cannot have a fruitful discussion.
You are clearly trolling and fishing around. and you're shamelessly deceitful.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
gladly.
Well if a homosexual male is sexually aroused from spanking a boy, that's sexual abuse. It's illegal.
Yes.
It's no different from me saying it's racist to assume a black male would steal your money if you were alone with him on the street.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
Yes. I was reading a bit too fast. See below -
as for the person who accuses heterosexual men of getting aroused by spanking girls...
well that person better have some proof to make that accusation otherwise that person would be subjected to civil and criminal liability.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 7
Nope, the topic is about school paddling not the TSA. And I am certainly not trolling, I stated that if you didnt want to answer the question that was fine.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
sure sure sure...
It is not that I am not answering your question as you're whining. It is you who are not accepting my answer despite of the fact that I have repeatedly answered your question.
It is very clear - you obviously and clearly are not comfortable with a male TSA agent doing a pat-down on your daughter. Why? very simple - it's inappropriate. Same thing with a male faculty member spanking a female student. It's inappropriate.
If you cannot understand that or if you disagree, well then there's really nothing further to discuss and we can just simply agree to disagree.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 7
sure sure sure...
It is not that I am not answering your question as you're whining. It is you who are not accepting my answer despite of the fact that I have repeatedly answered your question.
It is very clear - you obviously and clearly are not comfortable with a male TSA agent doing a pat-down on your daughter. Why? very simple - it's inappropriate. Same thing with a male faculty member spanking a female student. It's inappropriate.
If you cannot understand that or if you disagree, well then there's really nothing further to discuss and we can just simply agree to disagree.
Not sure what makes these things "clear" to you.
That is obviously an assumption on your part.I have understood, as everyone has for 2 pages, that you feel it is "extremely inappropriate". What is not understood is why you believe it is inappropriate. That is what Reba and I have been asking.