While I am on break from this 18 pages project for the finals, I decide to risk my purity by crossing to the dark side and read the topics and posts at other community/site (Note: I will not name the name of the community/site that I spoke of) Their comments are, at best, infactual but nonetheless interesting, or shall we say, hilarious to read. Examples of their comments: "Homosexual's fault for AIDs outbreak" or "homosexual's disease is AIDS", "prostitution is on blame for AIDS" list go on...
Ok, what causes AIDS excatly? Well, I want to share the facts that I found:
prostitution
So it means that prostitution's fault for AIDS outbreak is offically nonsense and dismissed.
Homosexual
1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pre Press Prof HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. June 2000: 6-48
2) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993 Revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adult and adolescents. MMWR Morb Mortal Wky Rep 1992; 41 (No. RR-17): 1-19.
3) Hammer SM, Squires KE, Hughes, MD, et al. A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus idinavir in person and CD4 cell counts of 200 or less. N Engl J Med 1997; 337-725-33.
There are plenty studies & evidences that support my point about homosexual and heterosexual. I don't know if you want to read some more... I believe you know much about it right? Homosexuality does not cause the AIDS, that sums up pretty much.
So what next? Both popular excuses (homosexual and prostitution) is clearly dismissed. Needles? Probably. Oral sex? Of course not. What really causes AIDS? Please share your thoughts, opinions or facts if you want to.
Ok, what causes AIDS excatly? Well, I want to share the facts that I found:
prostitution
That's exactly what my professor told me a while ago. She yet seen any evidences that prostitutes ever cause the AIDS outbreak. Similar studies support that as well:There is no evidence of any AIDS epidemic in Thailand among female prostitutes, based on the World Health Organization's (WHO) most recent on AIDS/HIV in Thailand. 85% of all AIDS cases in Thailand are in men and 10% in heterosexual women. There is no evidence that any of these females are prostitutes.
In June 1994, 513 female prostitutes were tested for HIV. 94% were negative. These were the most promiscuous prostitutes who worked the infamous red-light districts of Patpong. Drug use is also high which might explain how 6% were HIV+ in addition to the fact HIV can be transmitted male to female (with difficulty) but its almost impossible to transfer female to a intact healthy male, assuming no other risk factors.
There is no evidence that any tourists contracted AIDS from having sex with Thai prostitutes. On the contrary, a study of AIDS in Japan, Australia and Malaysia - all countries that frequent Thai prostitutes heavily - reveals a virtual absence of HIV/AIDS. Japan has less than 1000 cumulative AIDS cases and no HIV, even among the Japanese prostitutes. The Aussies likewise have hardly any AIDS cases, yet hundreds of thousands of Aussie men have a long history of frequenting the beautiful prostitutes of the Far East.
The fact that among Americans who live in Thailand and have been having unprotected sex with literally thousands of Thai prostitutes over a minimum 3 year period, not a single one of them is HIV+.
"The fact that I publish a book on travel to the Orient, I think, would qualify me as somewhat of an authority. After all, I lived in Thailand for 3 years and I interviewed literally hundreds of tourists and prostitutes and I've yet to meet or hear of one tourist or prostitute who is HIV infected as a result of their sexual lifestyle." He also notes that with the 200,000 Americans who visit Thailand every year - and 70% are men going there for the sex industry - there would be some evidence of HIV if it was spreading to customers of prostitutes.
Source: http://www.libchrist.com/std/facts.htmlMany More Prostitution Studies Show No Risk To Customers
And They Don't All Use Condoms!
Since heterosexual men don't get AIDS from prostitutes, they sure won't get it from other women, nor be a threat to their female partners.
"...Non-drug abusing prostitutes have no higher risk of AIDS than other women." (The U.S. National Academy of Sciences, 1990)
"The majority of prostitutes who have become infected with HIV in the US. have not become infected through sexual behavior. Most AIDS cases among women in the US. have occurred in women who use IV drugs...shared injection equipment rather than sexual activity has been the most significant transmission factor among female prostitutes." (AIDS: Sexual Behavior and Intravenous Drug Abuse, by National Research Council)
"Non drug using prostitutes in the U.S. play a small role in HIV transmission...80% of infected prostitutes (in the United States) reported using injection drugs" (AIDS Update 1994 - 1995, by Gerald Stine)
"Even prostitutes are not at risk for AIDS unless they also use drugs." (What Causes AIDS? It's An Open Question, by Kary B. Mullis, et. al; Mullis is the 1993 Nobel Prize winner for his invention of the PCR used to detect HIV.)
"There is no evidence that prostitutes constitute a special risk category..." (What to do about AIDS)
[Prostitutes]"...there is little direct evidence that they are a risk group ...unless a prostitute injects drugs she is unlikely to be infected with HIV...It is ironic that prostitutes have been scapegoated for AIDS. Contrary to popular belief, prostitutes are often among the best informed as to how to protect themselves...The chances of a person becoming infected are likely to increase with repeated exposure. Hence a long term infected partner is probably much riskier than a one-night stand with an infected prostitute. Although prostitutes have been blamed for the spread of AIDS, few if any cases of AIDS in men can be unequivocally linked to them." (Women and AIDS)
"Prostitutes represent virtually no risk for spreading HIV to non risk heterosexuals." (Ibid.)
"In Europe, there is as yet no evidence that female prostitutes are a source of HIV infection for the heterosexual population." (Social and Preventive Medicine)
"Despite high rates of sexual contact, HIV infection had been generally slow to spread to sex workers in Asia. For example, the latest data from South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan show levels of infection among commercial sex workers of below 1 percent." ("The Impact of HIV/AIDS on World Population," U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, May 1994, p.12)
"Evidence indicates at this time in the US., heterosexual men (as a group) engaging in sex with prostitutes (as a group) have not been contracting HIV from them. (Women, AIDS and Activism, p.181)
"From 1987 to 1992, in the Philippines, under the medical supervision of the U.S. military, over 31,710 Filipino prostitutes were tested for HIV infection. After over 10 years of sexual contact with American GI's as well as tourists from Japan, America, Germany, Australia, etc. 99.88% of the 31,710 prostitutes were found HIV-negative. There was no evidence that any of the prostitutes spread AIDS to any of the GI's nor evidence that any of the GI's spread AIDS to the prostitutes. However, there was evidence of high levels of sexually transmitted diseases, such as VD and the 'clap,' which indicated that many or most of the GI's were not using condom protection. This is powerful testimony that HIV/AIDS is not a sexually transmitted disease, except in very rare situations. Unfortunately, the media focus their attention only on these exceptions to the rule, giving the public the false impression that HIV is easily spread. Nothing could be further from the truth." (Ibid.)
"Of the 20,432 cumulative AIDS cases in Thailand, as of May 1995, 17,475 are males (85.5%) and 2,957 are female (14.5%). Of these females, 2,043 are heterosexual (the rest being IV drug users, blood donors, etc.). This means that AIDS in Thailand has little or nothing to do with prostitution. How could AIDS be caused and spread by female prostitutes when the majority (85%) of AIDS cases are not even female? Or are we now supposed to believe that prostitutes spread AIDS to their male clients, but the male clients don't spread it back to the prostitutes?" (Ibid.)
Conclusion: So why are we being told that prostitutes are at risk for AIDS ? The answer is clear. Condom companies use bogus AIDS statistics to boost condom sales and anti-prostitution organizations/religionists use AIDS scare tactics to promote their own code of sexual morality. In short, folks, we've been lied to. The chances of female-to-male transmission of HIV leading to AIDS has never been proven among healthy, non drug abusing heterosexuals with no other risk factors.
So it means that prostitution's fault for AIDS outbreak is offically nonsense and dismissed.
Homosexual
Source:The mode of transmission is related to behaviors that put any person at risk for acquiring HIV infection and subsequently to develop AIDS. Male to male sex (MSM) is the major risk behavior for Hawaii’s AIDS epidemic. As of 1999, 77% (1,798/2,345) of AIDS cases are MSM, and followed by both Injection Drug Use (IDU) and MSM/IDU. Figure 7 shows the percentages for MSM and MSM/IDU are decreasing in recent period; at the same time the percentages of other risk behaviors are increasing. As the graph of heterosexual AIDS cases shows the number of AIDS through heterosexual risk has increased since 1990. More than half of the female cases (53%, 77/145) are infected by heterosexual contact.
1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pre Press Prof HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. June 2000: 6-48
2) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993 Revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adult and adolescents. MMWR Morb Mortal Wky Rep 1992; 41 (No. RR-17): 1-19.
3) Hammer SM, Squires KE, Hughes, MD, et al. A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus idinavir in person and CD4 cell counts of 200 or less. N Engl J Med 1997; 337-725-33.
There are plenty studies & evidences that support my point about homosexual and heterosexual. I don't know if you want to read some more... I believe you know much about it right? Homosexuality does not cause the AIDS, that sums up pretty much.
So what next? Both popular excuses (homosexual and prostitution) is clearly dismissed. Needles? Probably. Oral sex? Of course not. What really causes AIDS? Please share your thoughts, opinions or facts if you want to.
Last edited:


