^Angel^ said:I'm shock and speechless that you had to announced this in the open forum....
It show unprofessional :thumbd:
^Angel^ said:I'm shock and speechless that you had to announced this in the open forum....
C.C.Sinned said::roll: not everyone feels they have to use PM.
I'm not thrilled he is banned. Stop assuming. You have no idea what type of person I am and you keep jumping to the wrong conclusions.^Angel^ said:No, you're just thriller that this member has been banned, and yet if it happen to you, you would throw a fist about it....
I guess you are a moderator. sigh...I'm disappointed the way you handled this situation because of your comment in this very public forum. You are really unfair for saying it to Heath in public.LinuxGold said:"Brown noser" pushed the button. The policy clearly states that personal attack is not allowed. You're banned for 2 days.
I let you go and I don't need to hear what you said. You little man!C.C.Sinned said::topic: this thread is not about your belief that Heath is doing God's work.
Momoftwo said:I let you go and I don't need to hear what you said. You little man!
yes they areCyberRed said:Hope things goes well this time.
deafdyke said:So just SAY that being sexually attracted to a woman does nothing for you. Seriously.....it's not a lifestyle. Lifestyle is a way of living your life. Being attracted to women is only one part of my lifestyle.....undy now?
Rose Immortal said:I think. I've heard people call same-sex couples living together an "alternative lifestyle." Am I not supposed to say that?
I'm not trying to be a jerk here, I'm seriously asking because I don't know.
That's the way I deal with trouble makers. Let everyone know you don't take crap from nobody...Rose Immortal said:BTW, the thing about how Linux handled the ban--I've seen different forums that work it different ways, and I can see why Linux did what he did. Perhaps he thought it was better that everybody, not just Heath, be exactly clear on what happened so it didn't look like Linux just banned him because he was having a bad day. Also, it shows other members a clear example of what's over the line and what's not. I know that may not be how it's always worked here (?), but that may be the reasoning.
Rose Immortal said:I think. I've heard people call same-sex couples living together an "alternative lifestyle." Am I not supposed to say that?
I'm not trying to be a jerk here, I'm seriously asking because I don't know.
BTW, the thing about how Linux handled the ban--I've seen different forums that work it different ways, and I can see why Linux did what he did. Perhaps he thought it was better that everybody, not just Heath, be exactly clear on what happened so it didn't look like Linux just banned him because he was having a bad day. Also, it shows other members a clear example of what's over the line and what's not. I know that may not be how it's always worked here (?), but that may be the reasoning.
Ok, I'm glad that you realized that you made a mistake.LinuxGold said:Your comments in this thread is uncalled for and IRREVELANT to this thread discussion. Create your own thread for your *OWN* cause. Heath might be of a good cause and for that, I agree with you, but fingerpointing wasn't.
I just discussed with Moderators and they pointed out what I did was wrong, by banning Heath in public and I apologize for it. I already warned Heath not to attack anyone personally and to stick to the thread. He continued to attack personally by saying "Brown noser" where he should just stopped at "It's a deal".
My apologies for being too public and I will put offenders into private messages from now on and ban if they continue to ignore.
For now, Let's get off the drama, and continue the discussion.
Scott
CyberRed said:It's why I've stated in my posts earlier that it's the best thing to talk about ourselves rather than talkin' about "them" ie "finger-pointin'" that they may be feel an insult or somethin' ( sometimes, it'd cause some misunderstandin' elsewhere in between lines ). Once we talk about ourselves what the issue is all about through our experiences, then they will not say anythin' about it, because it happened in our life -- and of course at times they will sometimes think "skeptical" to where it never heard of before ( dependin' on what issue we talk about ... like for example: some of them have a hard time believin' in me when I mentioned about the "dark" in my mother's soul. That's my understandin' to some degree ). It matters about the heart, soul and the mind.
diehardbiker65 said:Yea! That is what I have been trying to explain all along. Only one, you know the guy who just got banned refused to listen and accused me for making up lies against him. I just simply let him know that he can be banned for his actions, and that MOD is serious about banning if deem necessary. This is NOT about lies against him. It is the fact that EVERYBODY around here wants some respect! This person is making the exact same mistakes that RS did back then. I simply wanted to let him know to tone down and be happy ADers, that is all there is. What else can I say? He didn't realize that I don't have problem with 99.99% of members here at AD. That is because they all respected to others in public. I don't know about background and it is NOT my business anyway. I even had good conversations with these bible thumpers and I felt comfortable with them becuase they have NOT seized control over me just like this banned guy.
I have been hanging around and have friends with GLBT, and they are cool people!