Thank You Alex

Status
Not open for further replies.
actually Liebling I believe the law allows for a 3 year age difference in under age. Because of realizing about high school sweethearts and etc. SO therefore I believe 15-18 can date as long as they were sweethearts before he or she turned 18.

A friend of mine's son had a 15 year old girlfriend and she got preg before he turned 18, then he turned 18 but still together and the law is allowing it.
 
I know that Buckie was wrong from the get and go, but this 14 years old girl needs to stop private message men that are above the age of 18.
 
actually Liebling I believe the law allows for a 3 year age difference in under age. Because of realizing about high school sweethearts and etc. SO therefore I believe 15-18 can date as long as they were sweethearts before he or she turned 18.

A friend of mine's son had a 15 year old girlfriend and she got preg before he turned 18, then he turned 18 but still together and the law is allowing it.

But people said different in Alex's thread.

See the example of Jazzy's post.
http://www.alldeaf.com/641095-post75.html
 
No, not all! I have heard stories about arrests being made, and juror found guilty, ended up forcing them register on lifetime sex offender list!

actually Liebling I believe the law allows for a 3 year age difference in under age. Because of realizing about high school sweethearts and etc. SO therefore I believe 15-18 can date as long as they were sweethearts before he or she turned 18.

A friend of mine's son had a 15 year old girlfriend and she got preg before he turned 18, then he turned 18 but still together and the law is allowing it.
 
Remind me to find some 18 years old girl. I am in the mood to knock some up.
 
Taylor,
He said that to 14 years old girl? Oh my god!!! It makes me sick with pain....

Yes, It is a very sickness thing to even read. :barf: No matter what was being said between this 14 yrs old and him, he should have know better to think with his head than with his own dick.

Taylor said:
Something that needs to be mentioned here is that many people are assuming they know who the girl is. I will not say who she is, but I ask everyone to not assume that they know...there is a strong possibility (hint, hint) that you are wrong about this members identity and are now causing harm to somebody.

I am not assuming anything, I was told straight up that it was the same girl that Buckie talked to in private messaged. I am going to be quite honest with you, a message board is not for anybody who are underage, there are so many perverts out there are looking for just one thing, a free ride. They don't care how old this person is. So, I am a mother of two kids and I would not even allow my boys being on any message board and even chat rooms.
 
See? Steel X is very responsible and made the right decision, he is sane enough. I bet Steel X is much younger than loseRS, why can't this loseRS do the same thing?

I am not saying that this 14 years old should be ignored. She do deserve some attention and make sure she gets the discipline she needs, otherwise banned til 18 or whatever.

I've already PMed Alex about the kid who PMed me so he should be able to explain the safety to her...anyone else who got PMs from minors should testify that to Alex immediately if we want AD to be a more comfortable and safe place to visit online.
 
Understandable, but this won't be easy to have kids stay away from chat room. They are sneak and look for crack to go though. What I mean is that if you prohibit them, they are going to increase their curiousity and doing something that you may not want them to.

I don't mind having my kids using chat room.... of course it will be discreetly monitored! If I find my kids to be responsible, I would lighten up the monitoring and will still check periodly when least expected. Otherwise if I find my kids doing inappropriate action, then there will be a real long lecture and discussion!

So, I am a mother of two kids and I would not even allow my boys being on any message board and even chat rooms.
 
I am not assuming anything, I was told straight up that it was the same girl that Buckie talked to in private messaged. I am going to be quite honest with you, a message board is not for anybody who are underage, there are so many perverts out there are looking for just one thing, a free ride. They don't care how old this person is. So, I am a mother of two kids and I would not even allow my boys being on any message board and even chat rooms.

I dont know who told you 'straight up' but Alex was not even told who she was other than a 14 year old female member. The three members here that know are myself, Steve and of course her. And if its Steve telling you who she is, then think about what his intentions are by releasing her personal information. Again, I caution about posting information that may be incorrect or information that could bring harm to members. And remember, it could be one of your kids that is being discussed and people making assumptions about their actions.
 
Well, this is a proof that if NOTHING is done long time ago, the problem is going to get bigger and everybody will jump in drama. It is nothing new, here is proof again... Nothing is done before 9-11 and bang! Bonked and everybody jumped into the "patriotic" fever. Same thing here! Preventation is best way to avoid this from happening, but sad that in the last two years nothing much was done until now.

Yep, I am aware of that. Let's hope that Alex will KEEP the rules that he already made for EVERYONE - no more chance of " comin' back " after the last ban. Wonderin', if there's a rule about this to add Alex's rules ? I mean, it is against the law to solicit young girls. I am hopin' that Alex will add that to his rules as well, so that everyone will read it and agree to follow.

What do you think, DHB ? It would be interestin' to see everyone's opinion/pov/feedbacks/advices on this issue.
 
He stated many times that he knew it was against the law but he disagreed with the law, therefore it did not apply to him. There was a thread here the other day where he flat out admitted he knew it was against the law but thought he should be able to date somebody 14.

Yes, you are right. He choose to disobey US law.

He then mentioned going to other countries where this would be legal.

He think he can date 14 years old in other countries where the age legal is but it's not. The parents CAN cop him to crime for sex peverts/stalking to their children then the law take care of. The law will stamp him as sexual predator IF he BOTHER teenagers.

I would like to share with you all what I know.

Many 14 years old prefer to date between one and 3 years older, not more. It's rarely to see between 14 and 18 years old date oldest men... Few, I saw is a 15 years old girl was pregnant by 29 years old guy. Her mother is a friend of me. I know her since she was baby... Of course we were shock after learn that 29 years old made 15 years old pregnant. What a mother do? Nothing but respect her daughter's love for her 29 years old guy and offer him to live with them... Of course we were shock and disgusit about mother's reaction... We are wrong about her and have to agree with her for show her respect on her daughter's love for him and let her learn her own experiences. See, they are happy and love each other... until she is 18 years old and married him and then produced other child together... Now they are happily married for over 13 years now & have 2 beautiful children... I know which years of their marriage because they married on the same year where my son was born. Other friend of mine, I know her niece as little girl... She met 19 years old guy when she was just 15 years old... They were happy together... One year later after their first met, she fall in pregnant thru condom tear up... They produced a baby boy at 3 years ago. They are still happy together and live together at roof of my friend's sister's house. They will get married next year. I do not consider it as sex offender, prevert etc because they choose to love each other and want stay together... If anyone who are old and hungry for teenagers like Bucky did is a prevert... YES.
 
See? Steel X is very responsible and made the right decision, he is sane enough. I bet Steel X is much younger than loseRS, why can't this loseRS do the same thing?

I am not saying that this 14 years old should be ignored. She do deserve some attention and make sure she gets the discipline she needs, otherwise banned til 18 or whatever.

Like what I said before that Bucky is an immature child... Logical yes, Steel is younger and mature than Bucky. Bucky is a sick and prevert man.

I can tell from this thread about 14 years old girl that she has unhappy family background... She was being neglect by parental's discipline and attention which is a sad.
 
No, not all! I have heard stories about arrests being made, and juror found guilty, ended up forcing them register on lifetime sex offender list!

18 years old stamped as sex offender because he love 16 years old... *goose bumps* :cold:
 
Originally Posted by Bear
actually Liebling I believe the law allows for a 3 year age difference in under age. Because of realizing about high school sweethearts and etc. SO therefore I believe 15-18 can date as long as they were sweethearts before he or she turned 18.

A friend of mine's son had a 15 year old girlfriend and she got preg before he turned 18, then he turned 18 but still together and the law is allowing it.

No, not all! I have heard stories about arrests being made, and juror found guilty, ended up forcing them register on lifetime sex offender list!

It's suggestion.

It could be that Bear's friend did not cop minor into sex offender for make his girlfriend pregnant? It look like that their parents are open mind and accept their love?
 
I dont know who told you 'straight up' but Alex was not even told who she was other than a 14 year old female member. The three members here that know are myself, Steve and of course her. And if its Steve telling you who she is, then think about what his intentions are by releasing her personal information. Again, I caution about posting information that may be incorrect or information that could bring harm to members. And remember, it could be one of your kids that is being discussed and people making assumptions about their actions.

:confused: Taylor, Her name was being brought up from time to time in some posts and even threads as well. So nobody is that stupid enough to firgured it out who Steve really talked to in private messaged and who she also talked to in private messaged.
 
But people said different in Alex's thread.

See the example of Jazzy's post.
http://www.alldeaf.com/641095-post75.html


Liebling re-read what I posted. In Jazzy's post there is no mention of whether if they were together before he turned 18 or not. But in my post she got pregnant when he was 17. So, therefore there wasnt much the law could do about them being together after he turned 18. Same with me and my son's father I was 16 when we started dating. And then later I got preg with my son at 19 and he was 17 almost 18 at the time but there was nothing the law could do about it because we were dating way before I turned 18. I know this because he and I were both on probation for different reasons. That would have been juvenile probation though not adult. I was on it for skipping school due to hearing problems and no one realizing at the time what I needed, he was on it due to family problems at home.

So there are some cases where it is not considered statutory rape. But in THIS case being discussed if he did have sex with her it would be.
 
Liebling re-read what I posted. In Jazzy's post there is no mention of whether if they were together before he turned 18 or not. But in my post she got pregnant when he was 17. So, therefore there wasnt much the law could do about them being together after he turned 18. Same with me and my son's father I was 16 when we started dating. And then later I got preg with my son at 19 and he was 17 almost 18 at the time but there was nothing the law could do about it because we were dating way before I turned 18. I know this because he and I were both on probation for different reasons. That would have been juvenile probation though not adult. I was on it for skipping school due to hearing problems and no one realizing at the time what I needed, he was on it due to family problems at home.

So there are some cases where it is not considered statutory rape. But in THIS case being discussed if he did have sex with her it would be.

Yes I know... I understood your post... Have you see DHB's post? (he quoted your post).

I only showed Jazzy's post to you... Yes Jazzy didn't mention either 16 years old girl was being forced by 18 years old or not... OR they were together before he turn into 18 years old... She only said what 18 years old did is against US law for have a sex with 16 years old... that's all. I quoted Jazzy's post at other thread and want to see her reply on my question but she didn't. I hope she will when she has time.
 
I wanted to remind you. Some of you don't know what had happened few weeks ago, I am not in mood for revenge at all. What happened few weeks ago is that he created a thread asking where is this 14 years old girl!!!! Then he mentioned "WHen she becomes 18 yrs old, it wouldnt matter" That is a big fat red flag!!! I was shocked to learn that mod didn't do anything but take that thread down! I knew something was going on from there. Why nothing was done until now when it gets real bad? The fat red flags was in front of MOD's eyes! There is too many red flags that he said in between making it too obviously. I hope this is a serious lesson to be learn. I think the policy of enticing is too vague. Many of times, including myself wasn't interested in starting the trouble of others, only that I just add them to get them attention and warn them if they get to mess up they are gonna get banned. Of course they push beyond the enevelope, do it make me enticing them? I don't think so!

It is time for mod to take this seriously with any of members, otherwise there will be trouble waiting ahead.
:werd: He was almost screaming it out loud.
 
Liebling:))) did say 18 in her post which is legal. Some places do have models that are 18 and above but label it as 'teen porn' as a sales tactic (go figure)
I used to find those magazine when I worked housekeeping in a department store at 17. Guys would buy them for the "older man does the babysitter". checkout they young girls in the mall then head to the mens room and wack off. security would bust them often. Most of those magazines make the model look as if she is about 15. sick people out there... :crazy:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top