- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
Yes, they both are related, both of these drivers didn't possess any firearms, yet police open their firearms anyway.
Point here police should return fire when suspect opens the fire first. If suspect has not open fire then there is no reason for police open fire to begin with. Whats conflict between DC cop and Ohio cop is DC police don't get disciplinary action while Ohio police gets disciplinary action. DC police should be receiving disciplinary action regardless. Neither of DC and Ohio suspect open fire at all, not even have firearm at all.
Police have not seen the actual gun, why open fire when they don't see gun in the first place?
Secondly, why discipline one department (Ohio PD) when they thought they saw the gun and let other department DC PD) get away with it when they never thought they saw the gun?
the DC driver had already posed a DEADLY threat to EVERYBODY - public and officers.
you should know that when a driver attempted to ram thru White House security barrier with a vehicle and attempting to run over several police officers.... it's automatically a deadly threat that must be taken down with extreme prejudice.
I have absolutely no problem with DC police's action in this.