Conclusion
The data collected for and as a result of this study do seem to suggest that American Sign Language is a more capable tool than Exact Signed English for transmitting information to this particular participant. The total number of correctly answered questions is higher, the number of prompts and redirections is lower, and the total number of participant initiated interactions is much higher. Despite the apparent support of ASL that these data suggest, it is clear that more research is needed. As this is an oral child enrolled in an oral educational program, there was considerable concern that too many stories could be detrimental. Respecting the wishes of the parents, only four stories were presented to the participant. Theirs are perfectly valid concerns. However, in future studies, a greater number of stories presented may lessen the affects of the newness of the activity and unfamiliarity of the researcher. Also, a larger pool of participants would increase data and allow for further comparisons. Clearly, more research is needed to determine whether these results can be generalized to larger populations of deaf students. Further research should also be performed to determine the broader implications of this study and others like it.
Make sure you don't let any of them see what you have posted here, or you won't get accepted to a community college.
Time machine?
