posts from hell
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2004
- Messages
- 9,368
- Reaction score
- 10
Your previous edit and this link works.


Whew!Your previous edit and this link works.
![]()
Try page 10 on that link. It's about marital status.Item 13 on page 7 asks for employment information.
Try page 10 on that link. It's about marital status.
It was page 7 on the other pdf link.
Not legally.
Not without being subject to a law suit. In other words, not legally.

Read the description.Right. And so a cohabitant could be a parent, a friend, a cousin, etc. under that definition. Not necessarily a spouse. The questions regarding marraige are limited to that which is legally recognized as a marriage.
And, it is not known whether the partner was listed as a cohabitant if this form was required.
Read the description.
If the partner was a "partner" at the time, and was not listed under 17C, then the form was not filled out truthfully.
When the agents knock on the neighbors' door, they'll find out someone is "cohabiting" with the service member, so it's better to be honest from the get go.
Relatives would be listed under section 18.
Yes there is. Perhaps you should spend some time in the law library studying precedents.
Source please.
No.But, we don't know that the partner wasn't listed, do we?
Which would include the "partner."And I did read the description. It could apply to anyone with whom one has a close personal relationship.
The law library and the precedent lawsuits.
No.
Which would include the "partner."