Is Ted Kennedy's Senate seat falling into Republician hands?

[kokonut]

lol, you fail to understand my post.

I know that Scott Brown don't support gay marriage but rather to support civil unions, that's acceptable to me, the define about some soft on GLBT rights, it means he support some part of GLBT, not completely.

I checked Scott Brown's profile and his views so no question asked.

I understood you. I specifically put that part out about Brown's support on the definition and concept of marriage to show *YOU* that he has reached across both sides of the aisle (e.g. abortion vs marriage) and that he is described as a conservative for the most part.

 

[Foxrac]

Which one is not true? Point them out, please.

1) You blame on Obama for just $1.4 billion deficit.

2) Compare with state government with federal government, such as both of republican governors in VA and NJ has no virtually relation with Obama or federal government but just only for state so both of them won from low vote turnout as well due 2009 is odd year.

3) NY-23 got democrat house too and will have chance to win again in Nov 2010.

 

[Foxrac]

I understood you. I specifically put that part out about Brown's support on the definition and concept of marriage to show *YOU* that he has reached across both sides of the aisle (e.g. abortion vs marriage) and that he is described as a conservative for the most part.

No, Scott Brown is more moderate to me, nothing is conservative or extreme right wing, unlike you.

 

[Jiro]

um.... why are we still bickering over Browns? All I say is - congratulation Brown and good luck.

and beyond that...... I don't give a fuck and you should follow same cuz none of us live in Massachusetts.

lol.

 

[kokonut]

1) You blame on Obama for just $1.4 billion deficit.

2) Compare with state government with federal government, such as both of republican governors in VA and NJ has no virtually relation with Obama or federal government but just only for state so both of them won from low vote turnout as well due 2009 is odd year.

3) NY-23 got democrat house too and will have chance to win again in Nov 2010.

1) Obama was the one who signed the bills authorizing the extra spending to go beyond the congressionally approved spending budget for Fiscal year 2009. The blame is entirely on Obama for the massive increase in unncecessary spending. It's a fact. The $1.4 trillion dollar spending is all Obama.

2) You fail to understand the significance of a Republican win in a Democrat state (especially NJ) when both states had Democrat governors. It was the message behind the voters for picking a Republican that you need to understand, Foxrac. Democrats thought they were a shoo-in for those seats. How they are now scrambling for the November 2010 election.

3)I don't why you brought up #3. You failed to understand the significance of that race and why Owens won very narrowly. Study up on the Scozzafava and the GOP debacle, and look into the problem with the absentee votes when people already picked a Republican (Scozzafava) and mailed it in but she later dropped out of the race when the GOP finally endorsed Hoffman so late into the race. Even this scared the Democrats out of their wits when they saw just how narrow that race has gotten and was pretty much the first shot across the bow and warning of things to come. Sure enough. We saw what happened in VA, MA, and NJ. And this how voters are showing their discontent about Democrats and their free spending ways by voting for a Republican. Don't tell you I didn't warn you. November 2010 is looking grim for the Democrats.

 

[Foxrac]

1) Obama was the one who signed the bills authorizing the extra spending to go beyond the congressionally approved spending budget for Fiscal year 2009. The blame is entirely on Obama for the massive increase in unncecessary spending. It's a fact. The $1.4 trillion dollar spending is all Obama.

2) You fail to understand the significance of a Republican win in a Democrat state (especially NJ) when both states had Democrat governors. It was the message behind the voters for picking a Republican that you need to understand, Foxrac. Democrats thought they were a shoo-in for those seats. How they are now scrambling for the November 2010 election.

3)I don't why you brought up #3. You failed to understand the significance of that race and why Owens won very narrowly. Study up on the Scozzafava and the GOP debacle, and look into the problem with the absentee votes when people already picked a Republican (Scozzafava) and mailed it in but she later dropped out of the race when the GOP finally endorsed Hoffman so late into the race. Even this scared the Democrats out of their wits when they saw just how narrow that race has gotten and was pretty much the first shot across the bow and warning of things to come. Sure enough. We saw what happened in VA, MA, and NJ. And this how voters are showing their discontent about Democrats and their free spending ways by voting for a Republican. Don't tell you I didn't warn you. November 2010 is looking grim for the Democrats.

No, your post isn't true again because we bailed out the bank that how deficit went up during Bush Admin so the numbers aren't get completely until Obama got in office, even he has save GM and Chrysler from being lost during bankruptcy, not all of $1.4 trillion are goes to Obama, also goes same with Bush Admin.

lol, you fail to understand too so I chose to not explain to you again, I already said in other post so you are just so hardhead.

You are very paranoid about democrat so I don't give a damn.

 

[kokonut]

No, your post isn't true again because we bailed out the bank that how deficit went up during Bush Admin so the numbers aren't get completely until Obama got in office, even he has save GM and Chrysler from being lost during bankruptcy, not all of $1.4 trillion are goes to Obama, also goes same with Bush Admin.

lol, you fail to understand too so I chose to not explain to you again, I already said in other post so you are just so hardhead.

You are very paranoid about democrat so I don't give a damn.

The banks? No. Not all of it. Again, you don't understand something here. Read this here which will explain the break down.
Titanic Spending - HUMAN EVENTS

The CBO is estimating also that for 2010 we'll see a $1.3 trillion dollar deficit spending, almost an exact repeat of 2009 spending deficit. Again, this would all be Obama's making.

For Fiscal year 2009 a set amount of money was budgeted (voted by Congress in 2007/2008) and set aside. In comes Obama in 2009, he went beyond the budgeted amount by $1.4 trillion dollars. Easily beating out Bush's 2008 spending deficit by $800 billion dollar more.

It would've been better for GM and Chrysler to file for bankruptcy and file for re-organization. But the powerful unions didn't want that because doing so would nullify all of the union contracts worth billions of dollars. It was the "too big to fail" nonsense by the WH.

 

[Foxrac]

The banks? No. Not all of it. Again, you don't understand something here. Read this here which will explain the break down.
Titanic Spending - HUMAN EVENTS

The CBO is estimating also that for 2010 we'll see a $1.3 trillion dollar deficit spending, almost an exact repeat of 2009 spending deficit. Again, this would all be Obama's making.

For Fiscal year 2009 a set amount of money was budgeted (voted by Congress in 2007/2008) and set aside. In comes Obama in 2009, he went beyond the budgeted amount by $1.4 trillion dollars. Easily beating out Bush's 2008 spending deficit by $800 billion dollar more.

It would've been better for GM and Chrysler to file for bankruptcy and file for re-organization. But the powerful unions didn't want that because doing so would nullify all of the union contracts worth billions of dollars. It was the "too big to fail" nonsense by the WH.

You love to label me as not understand, are you trying to brainwash me to join your party?

It is easier to agreement to disagreement because I won't say your post is correct because it always opinion, I think we have done with debate before.

I'm not happy because you won't reply my PM, that how I lost your respect.

Congrat on Scott Brown so he is better than nothing.

 

[Jiro]

1) Obama was the one who signed the bills authorizing the extra spending to go beyond the congressionally approved spending budget for Fiscal year 2009. The blame is entirely on Obama for the massive increase in unncecessary spending. It's a fact. The $1.4 trillion dollar spending is all Obama.

2) You fail to understand the significance of a Republican win in a Democrat state (especially NJ) when both states had Democrat governors. It was the message behind the voters for picking a Republican that you need to understand, Foxrac. Democrats thought they were a shoo-in for those seats. How they are now scrambling for the November 2010 election.

3)I don't why you brought up #3. You failed to understand the significance of that race and why Owens won very narrowly. Study up on the Scozzafava and the GOP debacle, and look into the problem with the absentee votes when people already picked a Republican (Scozzafava) and mailed it in but she later dropped out of the race when the GOP finally endorsed Hoffman so late into the race. Even this scared the Democrats out of their wits when they saw just how narrow that race has gotten and was pretty much the first shot across the bow and warning of things to come. Sure enough. We saw what happened in VA, MA, and NJ. And this how voters are showing their discontent about Democrats and their free spending ways by voting for a Republican. Don't tell you I didn't warn you. November 2010 is looking grim for the Democrats.

The banks? No. Not all of it. Again, you don't understand something here. Read this here which will explain the break down.
Titanic Spending - HUMAN EVENTS

The CBO is estimating also that for 2010 we'll see a $1.3 trillion dollar deficit spending, almost an exact repeat of 2009 spending deficit. Again, this would all be Obama's making.

For Fiscal year 2009 a set amount of money was budgeted (voted by Congress in 2007/2008) and set aside. In comes Obama in 2009, he went beyond the budgeted amount by $1.4 trillion dollars. Easily beating out Bush's 2008 spending deficit by $800 billion dollar more.

It would've been better for GM and Chrysler to file for bankruptcy and file for re-organization. But the powerful unions didn't want that because doing so would nullify all of the union contracts worth billions of dollars. It was the "too big to fail" nonsense by the WH.

so this is related to Scott Brown..... how?

 

[Maria]

Perhaps Maria is like me and Chooses the best candidate for the Country rather than only supporting those that match our personal beliefs. Just a thought.

You are correct! I support our country and that's all I CARE about.

 

[Jiro]

Perhaps Maria is like me and Chooses the best candidate for the Country rather than only supporting those that match our personal beliefs. Just a thought.

but he is running for Massachusetts, not USA

 

[somedeafdudefromPNW]

but he is running for Massachusetts, not USA

Home of the Boston Tea Party?

Hope the people who voted for Brown remembered their own state's history.

 

[Foxrac]

but he is running for Massachusetts, not USA

That's right, man.

 

[Maria]

but he is running for Massachusetts, not USA

I am aware of Scott Brown is runnin' for Massachusetts. I am glad Scott Brown is doin' his well job against Democracy. :P

 

[Foxrac]

I am aware of Scott Brown is runnin' for Massachusetts. I am glad Scott Brown is doin' his well job against Democracy. :P

Democracy?

You are supposed means Democratic Party (or democrat or democratic), not Democracy because they are totally different word.

If you against on Democracy so it means you support authoritarian government.

 

[TXgolfer]

but he is running for Massachusetts, not USA

I mean in general.

When I vote for City council for example. I vote for who I think is best for the city. Arlington is the largest city in the country without public transport. Public transport would not help me much because I am rarely in town. But it would be good for our city so I vote for people who have a plan for public transport. When I vote for state reps I vote for the best for the state and when I vote for national reps I vote for the best for the nation.....not my individual needs. That's all I was saying.

 

[Maria]

Democracy?

You are supposed means Democratic Party, not Democracy because they are totally different word.

If you against on Democracy so it means you support authoritarian government.

Well, you know what I am talkin' about. I don't have to be perfect.

 

[Foxrac]

Well, you know what I am talkin' about. I don't have to be perfect.

Please just use democrat or democratic instead of democracy so we could understand your post without extra questions.

Democratic/Democrat and democracy aren't same word to define, just let you know.

 

[Foxrac]

I mean in general.

When I vote for City council for example. I vote for who I think is best for the city. Arlington is the largest city in the country without public transport. Public transport would not help me much because I am rarely in town. But it would be good for our city so I vote for people who have a plan for public transport. When I vote for state reps I vote for the best for the state and when I vote for national reps I vote for the best for the nation.....not my individual needs. That's all I was saying.

I don't care about public transport either, I prefer to own SUV or truck to drive.

 

[Maria]

Please just use democrat or democratic instead of democracy so we could understand your post without extra questions.

Democratic/Democrat and democracy aren't same word to define, just let you know.

What ever.