Gene therapy converts dead bone graft to new, living tissue

Vance

New Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
4,265
Reaction score
1
Researchers have created a way to transform the dead bone of a transplanted skeletal graft into living tissue in an experiment involving mice. The advance, which uses gene therapy to stimulate the body into treating the foreign splint as living bone, is a promising development for the thousands of cancer and trauma patients each year who suffer with fragile and failing bone grafts. The findings were posted online Feb. 13 and will appear in the March 1 issue of Nature Medicine.

The procedure, designed by a team led by Edward M. Schwarz, Ph.D., associate professor of orthopedics and of microbiology and immunology at the University of Rochester Medical Center, is intended to eventually aid people with various cancers or injuries whose treatment involves the replacement of large sections of bone. Cancers such as osteosarcoma, one of the most common types of bone cancers, or tumors that occur adjacent to bones, often must be treated by removing the diseased section of bone and replacing it with the only alternative available – a donated section of comparable bone from a cadaver. The new splint of bone is then literally screwed into place, giving the patient most of the strength and support of the original bone. Bone, unlike any other tissue in the human body, can still perform one of its functions, structural support, even if all its cells are completely dead. A serious problem arises, however, when the bone wears over time.

"Everyday activities cause microscopic fractures in our bones," explains Schwarz. "Those fractures are normal and healthy, and our bones re-knit them constantly. But when the bone is dead, there is no healing, and those tiny fractures begin to accumulate until finally, perhaps in 10 years, the implanted section collapses, and more drastic surgery becomes necessary."

To make the transplanted bone more robust, Schwarz looked into the activity of the genes and proteins that govern its health. His team replaced sections of bones in dozens of mice, using both healthy and dead segments, then scanned the surrounding inflammatory tissue for differences in the levels of the active genes. He discovered that the genes that create two key proteins in living bone, called RANKL and VEGF, were barely expressed around the dead bone. He then modified a harmless virus to carry these genes, devised a method of freeze-drying a paste containing the virus so it could be easily handled, and painted it directly onto a bone graft during surgery.

Numerous tests in mice confirmed that the virus permeated the inflammatory tissue around the dead bone and turned on the genes. The mouse body then began to treat the implanted bone as if it were its own tissue instead of a foreign object, which would normally trigger the body to wrap the "invader" in scar tissue.

"That recognition is the key," says Schwarz. "It's at that point that the body actually begins changing the dead, foreign bone splint, into the body's own, whole, living bone."

Such a transformation can occur because mammals use their skeletons for both support and as a kind of "calcium bank." If calcium, which is necessary for such important functions as maintaining the brain and heart, runs low, cells called osteoclasts dig out the calcium from our bones. This is why doctors encourage post-menopausal women to take calcium supplements, so that the body doesn't raid their bones for the calcium it needs. The process works both ways, fortunately, as another set of cells, called osteoblasts, rebuilds the bone when the body has excess calcium. In an average year, a healthy person may remove and rebuild 10 percent of his or her bone structure.

This process of teardown and rebuilding is triggered in the dead bone when Schwarz paints it with the genetically modified virus. New blood vessels begin to grow around and into the bone splint, stripping it down in times when the body needs the calcium, and rebuilding it when calcium levels rise. The bone that is rebuilt is now fully the patient's own, as if the dead bone were a house being renovated by replacing a single brick at a time without tearing the whole structure apart.

Schwarz's studies with mice showed their dead splints were quickly converted to new, healthy bone. He projects that the bone would be completely converted in just a year, and that a human bone might be completely converted in as little as five years. The Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation has been trying for two decades to conquer the issues complicating bone transplants, and the group has pledged to continue supporting Schwarz's research. Schwarz hopes to begin early human trials with the procedure soon.

"This technology looks like it will have a dramatic effect on success rates for cancer patients who would otherwise be facing choices as drastic as amputation," says Arthur A. Gertzman, executive vice president for research and development at the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation.

Other scientists have attempted to invoke a similar reaction in dead bone by infusing tissue-growing proteins directly into the bone. This has proven successful for the small bone transplants used in spinal fusion, but not for larger grafts, because the proteins' effectiveness wear off in just hours. By contrast, the gene therapy method triggers the tissue surrounding the graft to produce the proteins continuously for up to three weeks, long enough for the body to trigger the perpetual bone remodeling response. Stem cells have also seen success in this area, but Schwarz says their appeal has waned because their handling – keeping them alive and ready to use – is far harder than Schwarz's viral paste, which can be stored at room temperature and doesn't interfere with the normal grafting surgery.

"We're very excited about the prospects of this technology," says Schwarz. "Our ultimate goal is to apply this to one of the Holy Grails of orthopedics – cartilage repair. Unlike bone, damaged cartilage, even in a healthy person, can't re-grow or repair itself.

"It's a steeper challenge that would require additional technology such as light-activated gene therapy (LAGT) to site-specifically target the genes to the edge of the damaged cartilage during arthroscopic surgery, but we're looking to use the same idea of triggering the cartilage to remake itself."

Schwarz's work on bone revitalization and LAGT has just been recognized as one of the most important discoveries of the year by the Orthopedic Research Society (ORS) and the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS). Next week the ORS will honor Schwarz with one of the most prestigious awards in orthopedics, the 2005 Kappa Delta Young Investigator Award. The honor carries with it a grant for $20,000 to help expand his research.

Schwarz is also founder and president of the Rochester-based biotechnology company LAGeT, a company Schwarz spun off from his university research. The firm seeks to commercialize Schwarz's research findings on light-activated gene therapy and has licensed the technology from the university.

Also taking part from the University of Rochester were Hiromu Ito, Mette Koefoed, Prarop Tiyapatanaputi, Kirill Gromov, J. Jeffrey Goater, Jonathan Carmouche, Xinping Zhang, Paul T. Rubery, Regis J. O'Keefe, and Brendan F. Boyce. Other authors include Joseph Rabinowitz and R. Jude Samulski of the University of North Carolina; Takashi Nakamura of Kyoto University in Japan; and Kjeld Soballe of University Hospital of Aarhus in Denmark. The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Orthopedic Research and Education Foundation, and the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation.

Source: http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/


Wow, very interesting!
 
Very interesting indeed!

I did some patent work in this field in the late 80's and early 90's for the Arkansas Cancer Research Institute. This was all pre-genetic research and involved using pulverized cadaver bone material and special biodegradable polymers pressure moulded to form bone socket replacement matrix. Using slivers of self donated hip bone (pelvic and coxyc) to rebuild damaged vertabrae was a bit more successful in some patients, singe the rejection rate was lower and the natural bone already was infused with healthy living matrix, so the time to regenerate new matrix was eleminated. The idea of using virus to carry gene pieces into transplants and such was a pipe dream then. Welcome to the new milenium! And by the way, it offers the key to KILL CANCER AND TUMORS!!!!!
:cheers:
 
Meg said:
Malignent cells are cells with defective chromosomes. The part that tells the cell when, and how often to reproduce, and tell the cell to die, are defective. A virus altered with the right gene pieces inserted will "infect" the malignant cells and make them behave normally. It is really more complicated, so maybe Magatsu can expound on this for us?
 
Codger said:
Malignent cells are cells with defective chromosomes. The part that tells the cell when, and how often to reproduce, and tell the cell to die, are defective. A virus altered with the right gene pieces inserted will "infect" the malignant cells and make them behave normally. It is really more complicated, so maybe Magatsu can expound on this for us?

I understand but what if the malignent cells are right on bloodstream and the blood carries some of cells away to other parts of the body? Wouldnt this work more successfully if the malignent cells are in one place out of danger of spreading? It sounds complicated as I cant seem to find right words to ask this question?
 
Codger said:
The idea of using virus to carry gene pieces into transplants and such was a pipe dream then. Welcome to the new milenium! And by the way, it offers the key to KILL CANCER AND TUMORS!!!!!
:cheers:

So are you saying that it is now currently possible to permanently resequence DNA in vitro, at least in animals?
 
Levonian said:
So are you saying that it is now currently possible to permanently resequence DNA in vitro, at least in animals?
Codger said:
And by the way, it offers the key to KILL CANCER AND TUMORS!!!!!
Key. The Key. Genetic research is far ahead of what you might imagine, but at this juncture it is research. Craig Venter, for instance is working with mycoplasma genitalium , a harmless bacterium with 517 genes. It is in the primitive stages right now, but it does offer a key. You will see gene therapy in your lifetime, perhaps even mine. No, they are not working with higher order animals yet, but soon. Sooner than you think.
 
Meg said:
I understand but what if the malignent cells are right on bloodstream and the blood carries some of cells away to other parts of the body? Wouldnt this work more successfully if the malignent cells are in one place out of danger of spreading? It sounds complicated as I cant seem to find right words to ask this question?
I am certainly not a genetics expert. But, the viruses will be sequenced with the repair genes and given a finite reproductive life. They will be tuned to seek out the defective cells, wherever they are in the body, insert the corrected gene, then die.

Magatsu! Halp!!!! :ugh2:
 
VamPyroX said:
Wow... this is cool.
Way, way beyond cool! Do some online research for genetic breakthroughs. Lots of keyword combos like gene therapy cancer orgene research . Yo uget the idea. Then come back and report the bleeding edge results you find. IT IS YOUR GENERATION'S BALL!!!!
 
Codger said:
You will see gene therapy in your lifetime, perhaps even mine. No, they are not working with higher order animals yet, but soon. Sooner than you think.

I’m still confused—so it is not currently possible to splice genetic material in vivo (I meant to say in vivo in my previous post, not in vitro), but it will be within a decade or two?
 
Simple splicing is being done now. The problem is that they must determine first which of the existing genes are needed by the host organism to live. Say, 245 of 587. This is determined by removing those genes and seeing the effect it has. One. At. A . Time. BUT! with the latest computer available, the modeling calculations can be done in a fraction of the time. What this process also portends, is the mapping of the human genome. Which one gives you your hair color? Determines your skin tone? Etc., etc. Find the one involed in autism? Cancer? Use your imagination.

And by the way, the latest supercomputer is coming on line right now. Find it and report it's speed and power to me!
 
Codger said:
And by the way, the latest supercomputer is coming on line right now. Find it and report it's speed and power to me!

Give me a hint. Is it at the NASA Ames Research Center?
 
Levonian said:
Give me a hint. Is it at the NASA Ames Research Center?

OK. A small hint: IBM's Blue Gene/L tops the list with a sustained performance of 70.72 Teraflops, or trillions of floating point calculations per second. IBM's primary partner, the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Agency, will install a 360 Teraflop Blue Gene/L supercomputer in the first half of 2005.

http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/bluegene/ :laugh2:
 
Codger said:
What this process also portends, is the mapping of the human genome. Which one gives you your hair color? Determines your skin tone? Etc., etc. Find the one involed in autism? Cancer? Use your imagination.

So someday soon it will be possible eliminate the connexion-26 mutation which causes deafness, and there will be no more deaf people? :tears: :cry: :sadwave:
 
I don't think they will ever eliminate gene defects. But with the gene therapy, theoretically, they can replace the defective genes to correct genetic deafness. But remember how many causes there are of deafness. Not all are genetic.
 
Codger said:
Magatsu! Halp!!!! :ugh2:
Wow. I just cannot believe that this topic would have more than just one response...

I will post the detailed information in next post. I have to go out for important errand then come back and add the new post. Sorry about it.
 
Magatsu said:
Wow. I just cannot believe that this topic would have more than just one response...

I will post the detailed information in next post. I have to go out for important errand then come back and add the new post. Sorry about it.
Sure. Yeah. Just run away and leave me hanging here with drunk zombies! Dang, all I did was explain in layman's terms what you were posting, right? Right? This is what I was talking about in another thread when I mentioned bleeding edge technology and the speed of breakthrough progression. Anyone remember the term for that? Are you awake out there class? Halooooo! :)
 
Back
Top