Education Secretary Condemns PBS Show

tekkmortal

Active Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2003
Messages
1,534
Reaction score
0
Education Secretary Condemns PBS Show

By BEN FELLER

WASHINGTON (AP) - The nation's new education secretary denounced PBS on Tuesday for spending public money on a cartoon with lesbian characters, saying many parents would not want children exposed to such lifestyles.

The not-yet-aired episode of ``Postcards From Buster'' shows the title character, an animated bunny named Buster, on a trip to Vermont - a state known for recognizing same-sex civil unions. The episode features two lesbian couples, although the focus is on farm life and maple sugaring.

A PBS spokesman said late Tuesday that the nonprofit network has decided not to distribute the episode, called ``Sugartime!,'' to its 349 stations. She said the Education Department's objections were not a factor in that decision.

``Ultimately, our decision was based on the fact that we recognize this is a sensitive issue, and we wanted to make sure that parents had an opportunity to introduce this subject to their children in their own time,'' said Lea Sloan, vice president of media relations at PBS.


However, the Boston public television station that produces the show, WGBH, does plan to make the ``Sugartime!'' episode available to other stations. WGBH also plans to air the episode on March 23, Sloan said.


PBS gets money for the ``Postcards from Buster'' series through the federal Ready-To-Learn program, one aimed at helping young children learn through television.


Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said the ``Sugartime!'' episode does not fulfill the intent Congress had in mind for programming. By law, she said, any funded shows must give top attention to ``research-based educational objectives, content and materials.''


``Many parents would not want their young children exposed to the lifestyles portrayed in the episode,'' Spellings wrote in a letter sent Tuesday to Pat Mitchell, president and chief executive officer of PBS.


``Congress' and the Department's purpose in funding this programming certainly was not to introduce this kind of subject matter to children, particularly through the powerful and intimate medium of television.''


She asked PBS to consider refunding the money it spent on the episode.


With her letter, Spellings has made criticism of the publicly funded program's depiction of the gay lifestyle one of her first acts as secretary. She began on Monday, replacing Rod Paige as President Bush's education chief.


Spellings issued three requests to PBS.


She asked that her department's seal or any statement linking the department to the show be removed. She asked PBS to notify its member stations of the nature of show so they could review it before airing it. And she asked for the refund ``in the interest of avoiding embroiling the Ready-To-Learn program in a controversy that will only hurt'' it.


In closing, she warned: ``You can be assured that in the future the department will be more clear as to its expectations for any future programming that it funds.''


The department has awarded nearly $99 million to PBS through the program over the last five years in a contract that expires in September, said department spokesman Susan Aspey. That money went to the production of ``Postcards From Buster,'' and another animated children's show, and to promotion of those shows in local communities, she said.


The show about Buster also gets funding from other sources.


In the show, Buster carries a digital video camera and explores regions, activities and people of different backgrounds and religions.


On the episode in question, ``The fact that there is a family structure that is objectionable to the Department of Education is not at all the focus of the show, nor is it addressed in the show,'' said Sloan of PBS.


But she also said: ``The department's concerns align very closely with PBS' concerns, and for that reason, it was decided that PBS will not be providing the episode.'' Stations will receive a new episode, she said.


On the Net:


Postcards from Buster: http://pbskids.org/buster/


Education Department: http://www.ed.gov



01/25/05 21:46


© Copyright The Associated Press
 
Yeah I read about it this morning, these Religious Right are getting stupider and stupider every day. LIke what I said in other topic, they are in dire need of medicines and long-term therapy.

I mean, parents do have the remote to change the channels or turn off the TV right? Right?

... Right?

America is offically devolving back to Europe's Dark Ages. Hooray.
 
I just posted about this in "The Closet". I feel it is stupid! This is 2005. Gay and Lesbian couples are out there!
 
Playing devils advocate here (I'm bi), I don't think this is really a bad thing because its PBS. How many of you would have been outraged if Sesame Street had Jesus appear as a character and was preaching the gospel? Would you all be OK with that? If you aren't OK with that, would you agree that the episode of Sesame Street be taken off of the air?

Why would PBS be allowed to teach alternate lifestyles but not teach the gospel? There is a time and place for everything and in my opinion, PBS shouldn't be teaching gospels or sexuality.
 
I think parents would be pissed if PBS show their children the wrong lifestyle or encourage their children to use drugs or to drink excessively.
 
mspottedhorse said:
Playing devils advocate here (I'm bi), I don't think this is really a bad thing because its PBS. How many of you would have been outraged if Sesame Street had Jesus appear as a character and was preaching the gospel? Would you all be OK with that? If you aren't OK with that, would you agree that the episode of Sesame Street be taken off of the air?

Why would PBS be allowed to teach alternate lifestyles but not teach the gospel? There is a time and place for everything and in my opinion, PBS shouldn't be teaching gospels or sexuality.
I don't care if it was Jesus appears as a character to preaching the gospel on Sesame Street. Every individual should be exposed to different views to develop their own opinions and views. How can our kids know any difference if our kids didn't expose to different views?

At Sweden, orgy sex showed on TV channels plus Swedish culture encourages or rather, stimulate nude and such at many places... and rapes & excessive sex rate is very minimum, almost unnoticeable in statistics.

At Japan, sex, profanity, excessive violence, etc etc on TV nearly daily and crime rates are way low when compare to America.

List go on and on... The point is: If parents don't like the shows or something, they have the remote to change the channels or turn off the TV. They have the power to turn it off for damn sake. More and more TV have children-'proof' features to lock the certain channels out of children's eyes.
 
Magatsu said:
...I mean, parents do have the remote to change the channels or turn off the TV right? Right?
Right. I agree with you about that. That is the way I prefer to control program viewing in my home.

The problem with this particular dispute is that tax payer dollars support PBS.

If a private company wants to produce the program, then fine.

If my tax dollars are paying for the program, then no thanks.
 
Reba said:
Right. I agree with you about that. That is the way I prefer to control program viewing in my home.

The problem with this particular dispute is that tax payer dollars support PBS.

If a private company wants to produce the program, then fine.

If my tax dollars are paying for the program, then no thanks.
Well, I surely don't want these the programs which bash Jesus and his liberalism included homosexuality (bashing, against, etc) and I don't want to spend my tax dollars for these idiotic programs as well... but I am stuck with it. I even don't want to waste my tax dollars on that ridiculous Iraq war either.

If I bring it up to them and complain, they will say "liberal! devil liberal!" or "traitor!". Sorry but I failed to see your point about 'tax dollar' issue.
 
PBS should also mean diversity, teaching about different people and things in this world. Granted, sensitive topics such as homosexuality is inappropriate for children's shows, but why make it in the first place only to have it canceled for broadcasting? PBS is a public channel, and should cater to all different kinds of lifestyles. Other night, I watched a fascinating programme on tattooing. Really learned so much.
 
Magatsu said:
Sorry but I failed to see your point about 'tax dollar' issue.
I don't think my hard-earned dollars should pay for cartoons on TV.

PBS accepts donations from corporations and individuals. Let them pay for cartoons if they want. PBS doesn't need to use tax money for cartoons.
 
Magatsu said:
I don't care if it was Jesus appears as a character to preaching the gospel on Sesame Street. Every individual should be exposed to different views to develop their own opinions and views. How can our kids know any difference if our kids didn't expose to different views?

At Sweden, orgy sex showed on TV channels plus Swedish culture encourages or rather, stimulate nude and such at many places... and rapes & excessive sex rate is very minimum, almost unnoticeable in statistics.

At Japan, sex, profanity, excessive violence, etc etc on TV nearly daily and crime rates are way low when compare to America.

List go on and on... The point is: If parents don't like the shows or something, they have the remote to change the channels or turn off the TV. They have the power to turn it off for damn sake. More and more TV have children-'proof' features to lock the certain channels out of children's eyes.

But weren't you one of the ones that wanted Jesus out of schools and that seperation of church and state should be seperate. How is it the goverment should be funding the promotion of gay lifestyle, but shouldn't be funding or talking any religious stuff? That was the point I was getting at.

It just seems to me the people that shout the loudest that the government should not have anything to do with anything religious at all, want other things promoted. I don't have statistics in front of me but I would believe there are more christians than gays in the U.S.
 
mspottedhorse said:
But weren't you one of the ones that wanted Jesus out of schools and that seperation of church and state should be seperate. How is it the goverment should be funding the promotion of gay lifestyle, but shouldn't be funding or talking any religious stuff? That was the point I was getting at.
Education and Separation of Church and State is different issue from TV programs. Separation of Chruch and State always the best idea ever created in mankind history. Look at Europe's Dark Ages and different old civilizations. That said all really. We can turn off or change the TV channels that we feel that it will offend our beliefs or views. But we cannot 'turn off' the their delusional educations and we cannot 'turn off' the governments. See where I am going with? We are stuck with their twisted beliefs and reality permanently unlikely TV shows. That's entirely different issue.

mspottedhorse said:
It just seems to me the people that shout the loudest that the government should not have anything to do with anything religious at all, want other things promoted. I don't have statistics in front of me but I would believe there are more christians than gays in the U.S.
Well, there are at least more than 150,000,000 of us (liberals/progressives/catholics/freethinkers/homosexuals/etc/etc).. I pick this information from one of political magazines. If you want to compare the numbers then we should be in 'power', not these approx 60,000,000 non-progressive/non-liberal christians.

I heard that many countries in New Europe plan to promote the shows to reveal the bad sides and such about Religious Right and non-progressive/non-liberal christians. If Religious Right find out (which they already did or will find out), they will be frown upon these europeans yet it is ok for them to bash homosexuals or liberals.

Well, we can debate forth and back and get nowhere... once they remove the Separation of Church and State, I can always move to Sweden and enjoy the freethinking culture with almost any kind of crimes are virtually low.
 
Last edited:
wow, I made few typos & bad grammar in my post.. I couldn't edit and clean it up due to edit function removed. Oh well.

mspottedhorse, there is one thing I want to add to my previous post: History always repeated itself. It hasn't been failed for many thousand years. So therefore Europe's Dark Ages will be repeat in Amercia if separation of Church and State removed or allow the politicans armed with twisted beliefs or religion to control the governments.
 
Back
Top