Beowulf said:
What kind? Fired by whom? Fired for what reason?
2) That's what I want to know. Look at the site of impact. NO DEBRIS WHATSOEVER, just a tiny bit of damage. Where is the black box? We are to believe that EVERY MICROMETER OF THE PLANE VAPORIZED???
Actually there are photos that show debris outside the building. Yes, most of what was inside the building was "vaporized". The reinforced concrete structure acted like a crematorium oven, concentrating the jet-fuel fed intense fire.
About the "black box", from Fox News, 9/15/01:
"Meanwhile, investigators tell Fox News they are getting 'good, solid readings' from American Airlines Flight 77's data recorder. That plane crashed into the Pentagon, killing a total of 188 people in Washington — a combination of military and civilian employees on the ground and the passengers in the plane.
According to data on the recorder, the plane was going 345 miles per hour when it crashed at about 9:30 Tuesday morning. Investigators also say the recorder has speed and altitude information for the plane's entire flight.
The plane's voice recorder was also recovered, but National Transportation Safety Board officials say it was too damaged in the fire to obtain any information from it."
3) No one saw Flight 77. No one showed any evidence that it was on radar.
"Reagan national controllers then vectored an unarmed national Guard C-130H cargo aircraft, which had just taken off en route to Minnesota, to identify and follow the suspicious aircraft. The C-130H pilot spotted it, identified it as a Boeing 757..."
"...FAA radar equipment tracked the flight from the moment its transponder was turned off at 8:56..."
4) To rile public sentiment into going along with whatever they designed for post-911.
Let me get this straight. Within minutes after the two planes hit the WTC, the President thought, "hmmm...we are under attack; the best action to take now is to send a missile into the Pentagon." That doesn't make any sense. If you are supposing that Secretary Rumsfeld was in on the plot, he was thinking, "wow, Muslim terrorists are attacking our country; I think the best thing to do is call in a missile strike on the Pentagon. I think I'll just sit here at my desk in the Pentagon and wait for the big boom." Sounds reasonable. Also, if this was truly a "Bush administration" plot, why would they leave so many supposedly "obvious" clues? If there was any credibility to this theory, why aren't the Democrats jumping all over this during the election season? If the Democratic leaders think this was a plot, how come they are not screaming for the impeachment and prosecution of George Bush? Wouldn't they be the first to jump on the opportunity?
5) Not necessarily. You are trying to put assumptive words into my mouth. There are tapes of the jetliners at the WTC. No tapes except of the missile at the Pentagon.
Where is there a tape of a missile at the Pentagon? Even the websites you provided don't show that.
6) If a huge jetliner hit the Pentagon, why was there so little damage? The missile hit at exact ground level, and it exploded inward as well as outward, so of course there was some structural collapse.
What do you consider "little damage"? It looks like
huge damage to most people. Remember, the Pentagon building is not tall like the WTC, and that wing had been recently reinforced to minimize structural damage. From the outside it wasn't obvious but the inside was gutted. The plane hit between the first and second floors, not ground level. You can see in the photos that it did not explode outward like a missile strike.
7) A missile. Come on now, look at the pictures and tapes of that fireball. It was not that HUGE. A Hellfire missile could easily do that. And witnesses in the area smelled cordite.
Again, it was a huge fireball, much of it burning behind the outer walls. The fuel capacity of a smaller plane would not do that. Do you remember the small plane that hit a tall building in Florida a few months later? The young pilot flew it directly into the building, which was not reinforced concrete. The plane was sticking out from the window, almost intact. No fire. If a plane that size had hit the Pentagon, it would have looked like a squashed bug on the outside wall. At most it would have broken a window. Obviously something much bigger and heavier hit the Pentagon. The wings broke off upon impact, crushing inward to the fuselage, spraying jet fuel throughout.
8) What makes the government so believable to you that you would believe THEM and not your lying eyes? That is ridiculous.
Maybe, by some stretch of imagination, one agency could "plot" something but the complexity of so many various agencies, federal, state, local, civilian, and military, involved in so short a time would make such a conspiracy impossible without "leaks". It would require the cooperation of so many agencies and players with so many different agendas and goals that it couldn't happen. You have already seen that one of the major problems we face in our war against terrorism is the lack of cooperation and coordination amongst the agencies, and that is even with a common goal. Also, there are too many loyal Americans in the various agencies who would never go along with such a plot.
You should enjoy the new version of
coming to theaters soon.
And finally, there are thousands of sites on this matter because the truth cannot be hidden forever.
Yes, and there are thousands of sites supporting alien abductions, Big Foot, racial supremacy, Da Vinci codes, etc. That doesn't make things "true".
So what? I have explained that to you over and over. That is no proof, totally irrelavent, not even logical. Do you not understand English?
Leaders of other counties have said the same.
Really? Which "leaders" said that a missile hit the Pentagon?
that's good one..
