Another, "I didn't do it!"

Status
Not open for further replies.
jillio said:
He didn't say anything about Clinton.:laugh2: Stop trying to insert your own biases into other people's posts.
Click to expand...

Just expanding on his point, which is my right, which is what you have always tried to deny others from doing. FYI: I was not off topic, he brought up POTUS and the country.
 
Jiro said:
If Gingrich and Cain were POTUS... would you say they have disgraced the Oval Office and this whole country?
Click to expand...

If they did anything close to what Clinton did, A HUGE BIG YES.
 
rolling7 said:
I'm almost sure there are people who what you to "just go away" and there are some that wish I would "just go away" but we ain't getting paid to.:(
Click to expand...

Don't make assumptions about me, and particularly don't make assumptions about me in direct relationship to you.
 
rolling7 said:
Just expanding on his point, which is my right, which is what you have always tried to deny others from doing. FYI: I was not off topic, he brought up POTUS and the country.
Click to expand...

No, you weren't expanding. You were changing the whole intent and context.
 
rolling7 said:
If they did anything close to what Clinton did, A HUGE BIG YES.
Click to expand...

You really should deal with your Clinton fixation.

BTW, this thread is about Cain, not Clinton. I know they both start with the same letter, but try to keep them straight. Stick to the topic or I will report your posts as trolling.
 
Jiro said:
If Gingrich and Cain were POTUS... would you say they have disgraced the Oval Office and this whole country?
Click to expand...

They certainly have managed to disgrace themselves without being POTUS.:lol:
 
jillio said:
Didn't see Cain anywhere in the post, and I am not going to spend time perusing his nonsensical links. Everytime I do, I find something that proves him wrong.

Funny, from a racist thread to a sexist thread.:hmm:
Click to expand...

Read more carefully

Here is the entire post for you

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradB08
It must be part of your imagination because the Tea Party really is a minority of ignorant, racist douchebags.

Feel free to TRY and prove me wrong.
Click to expand...

The burden of proof is on the accuser. Prove they are racist.

Here - I will hold your hand:

News and Articles by and about Herman Cain - the Hermanator Experience


Quote:
Her second intellectually challenged question was why do I associate with those tea party people, who are the same ones that used to hang black people 100 years ago? I resisted the urge to point out that tea party attendees were not alive one hundred years ago and that most of the centenarians were probably at home watching the tea parties on TV. Here’s what I did say: I associate with tea party people because I share their passionate disagreement with the escalation of big government, legislation and taxation without members of Congress reading the bills, and an arrogant disregard for the voice of the majority of Americans by President Obama and the Democrats. The caller interpreted those disagreements as Obama bashing.
Click to expand...

Now, here is an incentive for you to prove the Tea Party is racist:

BBCW: No One Has Claimed Andrew Breitbart's $100,000 'N' Word Tea Party Reward
Click to expand...
$100,000 (btw, no one has proven it yet)

2010: A Race Odyssey — Disproving a Negative for Cash Prizes or, How the Civil Rights Movement Jumped the Shark - Big Government


Now lastly, but not least - I completely agree with Herman Cain when he said this:


Quote:
People who use race and illogical comparisons to segregation and slavery to defend President Obama are the real racists. They resort to this empty logic when they are desperate to say something to refute the facts even if it does not make sense. It is also an attempt to silence and intimidate people, especially white people. According to their empty logic, that makes me a black racist against black people, in addition to an “Uncle Tom” and a “sellout”.
Click to expand...
Rational American Citizens Interested in Saving This country are not the racists. We are the patriots.


NowPublic | World


YAAAAWN
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
rolling7 said:
Thank you for this post. I have saying for years that POTUS Clinton disgraced the Oval Office and this whole country.
Click to expand...

Do you agree that the allegations against Cain are troubling and worthy of investigating?
 
deafskeptic said:
I'd be wondering why people aren't troubled by the allegations as well.
Click to expand...

Yep. It appears there are those that don't seem to be concerned. I guess it is only a matter of concern if it is a Democrat involved.:roll:
 
*testing microphone*
Cain is toast.

Stick a fork in him, he is done.

Dead meat.



All kidding aside, I haven't had time to read all the posts. I just know that in order for an accusation of sexual harassment to be seriously considered, it has to be within guidelines. It seems that the women do have a case, and let us not forget that we do not need to prove it. The preponderance of the evidence is more than suffice to give Cain the bum's rush out the door.
About time, anyway, since he looks guilty, Guilty, GUILTY!!! :giggle:
 
rolling7 said:
If they did anything close to what Clinton did, A HUGE BIG YES.
Click to expand...

ah ok. this is the fact -

1. Newt Gingrich had an affair.
2. Four(?) women have came out and said they were sexually-harassed by Cain.

Whether or not if Cain sexually-harassed them is an issue of credibility - no doubt. Was it part of filthy low-ball smear campaign aka "Character Assassination"? probably. probably not. Did it really happen? probably. probably not. But we can look in the past and the history has shown that countless of men in power have repeatedly sexually-harassed or raped women and made them disappear by offering a hush hush money or a job somewhere far away. I wouldn't be surprised if women took the deal along with non-disclosure agreement because they knew very well that they stand no chance against men in power or they'll risk their own character assassination too.
 
jillio said:
You really should deal with your Clinton fixation.

BTW, this thread is about Cain, not Clinton. I know they both start with the same letter, but try to keep them straight. Stick to the topic or I will report your posts as trolling.
Click to expand...

Want to be reported as a BULLY?

trolling does NOT include an answer to a post put to me my a member.
You do NOT get to dictate what others ask me nor do you get to dictate my respond.
 
Jiro said:
ah ok. this is the fact -

1. Newt Gingrich had an affair.
2. Four(?) women have came out and said they were sexually-harassed by Cain.

Whether or not if Cain sexually-harassed them is an issue of credibility - no doubt. Was it part of filthy low-ball smear campaign aka "Character Assassination"? probably. probably not. Did it really happen? probably. probably not. But we can look in the past and the history has shown that countless of men in power have repeatedly sexually-harassed or raped women and made them disappear by offering a hush hush money or a job somewhere far away. I wouldn't be surprised if women took the deal along with non-disclosure agreement because they knew very well that they stand no chance against men in power or they'll risk their own character assassination too.
Click to expand...

Well said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top