Sarah Palin Quits

Because they believe the lies the newspapers tell of her.

I don't so I see her the way she is. I'm only sorry she is leaving. I wish I could meet her one day because I really respect the way she behaves towards her children. Even though I don't agree on everything she stands for. Only on Pro life issues and disability issues.

It's not because she has a child with downs syndrome. It's the positive attitude she has shown to her child and her backing her teenage daughter when she is pregnant. It's things like that which really impress me about a polition.

Palin backing her pregnant daugther does not made her a good Governor! Or having a handicap baby! There are a lot of women that had handicap babies that does not mean they are capable of running for office!
 
Today, I chatted with my friend on VP. She lives in Alaska since fall 2008. She told me that grow number of Alaska people hate Sarah Palin.
 
I never said that Palin didn't hunt. I said that she didn't hunt from planes or helicopters.

I am not surprised that you see things that aren't there. There is no proof that she hunts from planes or helicopters.


Yes, Sarah Palin does have lifetime member in NRA.

Recently, I checked snopes.com. They are excellent to give us good information as true or hoax.

Fact - She enjoyed outdoor and hunting. Same as Ted Roosevelt loved big game in hunting.
see story at: snopes.com: Theodore Roosevelt and Sarah Palin



I am part of Photographer in Media Member for Rivals.com. They have right to protect college or high school what I caught (in photo) something happen at event. They do not want to show some pictures because they do not want to see turn ugliest against.... Keep silent and respect as protect all NCAA & High School.

Many people heard about Sarah Palin did shoot animals from plane or helicopter. At work place, I talked about one person said, "There is no proof". My co-worker is hard-core in GOP member (support Sarah Palin). She told me that Sarah did but Media can't gave away story. Sarah Palin wants "Censored her hunting story" as protect herself.

Everyone (100 percent people from my workers, family members and friends) asked me why one person (from alldeaf) still doubt.....
 
I was right about her in first place. She is not ready for higher job and she already showed herself. She is a quitter.
 
I was right about her in first place. She is not ready for higher job and she already showed herself. She is a quitter.


If you had 1/2 million dollars worth of legal bills (and mounting)from people filing frivolous ethics charges over nothing and as governor you are not protected from lawsuits (even though a sitting U.S. President is) knowing that as Governor you cannot pay off even a 1/5 of that bill, what would you do? You cannot pursue book deals or go on a speaking circuit because you are committed to your time in office first but at the same time your legal bills mount. What would you do?

She is taking the opportunity to strike while the iron's hot to use her free time on book deals, speaking circuits, and help restore America to her rightful place.

It's easy to say "quitter" when you're not facing down over $500,000 dollars in legal bills. It's also easy not to attend to your senatorial duties for two years at tax payers' expense by being absent most of the time in order to run for president.
 
It's also easy not to attend to your senatorial duties for two years at tax payers' expense by being absent most of the time in order to run for president.
Yo, Einstein....in my state, the defeated Republican Senatorial candidate cost the taxpayers untold amounts of legal costs, plus 6 months of lost Senate representation, because he could not concede that the voters had chosen the other guy. He had recounts, lawsuits, etc, until the State Supreme court ruled for him to step aside. His replacement was finally sworn in this week. I liked the defeated candidate more than the one that was elected, but after this, I lost respect for him. Maybe he was hoping for a similar victory as Bush over Gore; the "hanging chad" debacle.
 
This is your hang up not mind! You bet not watch the movie about Lenny Bruce! Your ears might fall off! And do not read "Catcher in the Rye"
I don't think you can handle all the nasty words in it!
We're getting too off topic. (BTW, I did read Catcher in the Rye over 40 years ago in high school, and I found it boring.)
 
If you had 1/2 million dollars worth of legal bills (and mounting)from people filing frivolous ethics charges over nothing and as governor you are not protected from lawsuits (even though a sitting U.S. President is) knowing that as Governor you cannot pay off even a 1/5 of that bill, what would you do? You cannot pursue book deals or go on a speaking circuit because you are committed to your time in office first but at the same time your legal bills mount. What would you do?

She is taking the opportunity to strike while the iron's hot to use her free time on book deals, speaking circuits, and help restore America to her rightful place.

It's easy to say "quitter" when you're not facing down over $500,000 dollars in legal bills. It's also easy not to attend to your senatorial duties for two years at tax payers' expense by being absent most of the time in order to run for president.

:werd:
 
GLBT isn't part of personal choice, it's part of gene and psychiatric.

Please consider to check on psychiatric before you turn into against on GLBT, it's not big religion issue because not everyone has same or fair religion.
APA Help Center - Health & Emotional Wellness - "Sexual Orientation and Homosexuality"

Don't find any excuse that you or others are trying to against or mistreat on GLBT, it's just compare to black people in 1960's. Religious reason is out of question.

It's nothing to be wrong for politicians to support it.

:topic:

You know what's funny? A lot of people are saying that being gay is heredity, but yet the studies for it are all recently done. Nothing dates back 100 years or more, which would be much more reliable to back that hypothesis.

However, my thread isn't discussing homosexuality, is it? Let's get back on track, shall we?

Note to shel: That's not the reason regarding the deaf community in Fargo-Moorhead. Here is Springfield, the people are alright, although I haven't gone to a deaf coffee yet . . . it's just too darn hot and humid to have coffee! ;)
 
This has nothing to do with deafness. I posted my views on Sarah Palin on a hearies message board. Same hate from them too.

I guess it's just because some people believe what they read. (sigh)

Yeah, I actually couldn't agree more with you dreama. What really alarms me is that people aren't being taught to use critical thinking. FOr instance, how many of us believe those gossip rags that are sold at the counter in stores . . . you know the ones with the headlines . . . Baby Born with a Dragon Head . . . Woman Who Has Five Breasts . . . those kinds of things. Doesn't anyone have their own brain anymore to know how to sift the wheat from the shaff? Take a look at your local headlines, they're getting more bizarre all the time.
 
Obama is against same sex marriage. He seems to defend the "Defense of Marriage Act" (DOMA). Something about saving money, too.
AMERICAblog News| A great nation deserves the truth: Obama defends DOMA in federal court. Says banning gay marriage is good for the federal budget. Invokes incest and marrying children.

Your point?

kokonut,

This isn't a reliable source of information as it's a blog of a wanna be. It's not credible. As a news reporter, if it's not coming from the source and reported through the media, it's not credible. The only thing above that is the actual statement from the source, such as The White House. This is only someone's personal opinion.

People, if we're quoting someone or a website, it needs to be factual and unedited for credibility. Your own credibility is called into account and I don't think I know anyone who wants to be known as a gossip and spreading stuff found on the Internet that's not factual. I'd be out of a job if I did that and my paper would lose credibility. That's not a good thing.
 
Okay people! We're getting off topic with this glbt jazz, so let's keep to our original topic! :D
 
kokonut,

This isn't a reliable source of information as it's a blog of a wanna be. It's not credible. As a news reporter, if it's not coming from the source and reported through the media, it's not credible. The only thing above that is the actual statement from the source, such as The White House. This is only someone's personal opinion.

People, if we're quoting someone or a website, it needs to be factual and unedited for credibility. Your own credibility is called into account and I don't think I know anyone who wants to be known as a gossip and spreading stuff found on the Internet that's not factual. I'd be out of a job if I did that and my paper would lose credibility. That's not a good thing.
How about this?

From the White House:

"He supports full civil unions and federal rights for LGBT couples and opposes a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. He supports repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell in a sensible way that strengthens our armed forces and our national security, and also believes that we must ensure adoption rights for all couples and individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation."
Civil Rights


The official statement released along with the memorandum itself told the sort of story that moved him to sign it, and also announced his support for the Domestic Partners Benefits and Obligations Act of 2009.
The White House - Blog Post - ?Wrongs that We Intend to Right Today?


"The President and First Lady hosted the first-of-its-kind LGBT Pride Month reception at the White House..."
The White House - Blog Post - Celebrating LGBT Pride Month


REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT THE SIGNING OF A
PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM
REGARDING FEDERAL BENEFITS AND NON-DISCRIMINATION
The White House - Press Office - Remarks by the President at the Signing of a Presidential Memorandum Regarding Federal Benefits and Non-Discrimination


THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release March 13, 2009

PRESS BRIEFING
BY
PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
"Q Robert, there was a piece this morning about the fact that same-sex spouses of federal employees are barred from health care coverage because -- by the Defense of Marriage Act. Since the President would like to see a legislative repeal of that law, what is he prepared to do about it?

MR. GIBBS: Well, obviously I saw the story, and the President's position remains the same. The President would work with Congress in order to -- not just on this but on other ideas -- institute what he promised he'd do in the campaign.

I don't have a specific update on where the legislation is."
The White House - Press Office - Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 3/13/09


THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secrectary
__________________________________________________
For Immediate Release May 6, 2009

RESS BRIEFING BYM
SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON
AND PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
"Q Does the President or the White House have a reaction to the Governor of Maine signing a same-sex marriage bill?

MR. GIBBS: No, I think the President's position on same-sex marriages has been talked about and discussed.

Q He opposes same-sex marriage.

MR. GIBBS: He supports civil unions.

Q Does that mean that he's going to say or do anything against what the citizens of Maine --

MR. GIBBS: Not that I'm aware of. I think the President believes this is an issue that's best addressed by the states.

Yes, sir."
The White House - Press Office - Briefing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 5-6-09


THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
______________________________________
For Immediate Release May 12, 2009

PRESS BRIEFING BY
PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

Q Okay. And the second question on a completely different topic -- the President opposes same-sex marriage, but he supports giving same-sex couples the same rights as married people.

MR. GIBBS: And benefits.

Q Same rights and benefits. What's your response to critics of his policy who say this is exactly separate but equal?

MR. GIBBS: Well, I would point you to the any number of times that he was asked this during the campaign and addressed it.

Q I don't think he was ever asked is this separate but equal.

MR. GIBBS: No. In fact, it was asked on multiple occasions, and I can pull you something on that. It's the President's belief -- he strongly supports civil unions, and supports ensuring that they have access to the rights and benefits, such as hospital visitation and things like that, that are enjoyed by others.
The White House - Press Office - Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 5-12-09


THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_________________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release May 18, 2009

PRESS BRIEFING
BY
PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
Q The President supported the Defense of Marriage Act -- for repeal of that during the election. Now that same-sex couples can marry legally in five different states, what is the President doing to make sure that those marriages can be recognized at the federal level? And what's the time line for something like that?

MR. GIBBS: I will -- I have to go check on that. I honestly don't know the answer to that.
The White House - Press Office - Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 5/18/2009



THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_________________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release June 17, 2009

PRESS BRIEFING
BY PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

Q Does the President stand by the legal brief that the Justice Department filed last week that argued in favor of the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act?

MR. GIBBS: Well, Jake, as you know, the Justice Department is charged with upholding the law of the land, even though the President believes that that law should be repealed.

Q I understand that. But a lot of legal experts say that the brief didn't have to be as comprehensive and make all the arguments that it made, such as comparing same-sex unions to incestuous ones in one controversial paragraph that's upset a lot of the President's supporters. Does the President stand by the content, the arguments made in that brief?

MR. GIBBS: Well, again, it's the President's Justice Department. And again, we have the role of upholding the law of the land while the President has stated and will work with Congress to change that law.
The White House - Press Office - Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 6/17/09


THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_________________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release June 26, 2009

PRESS BRIEFING
BY
PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
Q Can I ask a little bit more about Monday's --

MR. GIBBS: About Michael?

Q Not about -- (laughter.) Monday's event, gay and lesbian --

MR. GIBBS: I admit I don't have a whole lot on it, but yes.

Q You spoke about that it's going to be a salute to the accomplishment of gay and lesbian Americans. Is this a sign that the President is feeling political heat from this group, that he felt that he should schedule this?

MR. GIBBS: No, this is an event scheduled around Pride Month.

Q Around Pride Month? And this is the first time that the White House has done that sort of event here.

MR. GIBBS: This will be the first time we've had Pride Month while we're in the White House.

Q I was just wondering what -- are we to expect any substantive announcements on the two issues that that community has right at the forefront right now -- Defense of Marriage and "don't ask, don't tell"?

MR. GIBBS: No.

Yes. Nothing?

Q Well, I don't know.
The White House - Press Office - Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 6-26-09


THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
________________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release June 29, 2009

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT LGBT PRIDE MONTH RECEPTION

East Room

"I've called on Congress to repeal the so-called Defense of Marriage Act to help end discrimination -- (applause) -- to help end discrimination against same-sex couples in this country. Now, I want to add we have a duty to uphold existing law, but I believe we must do so in a way that does not exacerbate old divides. And fulfilling this duty in upholding the law in no way lessens my commitment to reversing this law. I've made that clear.

I'm also urging Congress to pass the Domestic Partners Benefits and Obligations Act, which will guarantee the full range of benefits, including health care, to LGBT couples and their children. (Applause.) My administration is also working hard to pass an employee non-discrimination bill and hate crimes bill, and we're making progress on both fronts. (Applause.) "
The White House - Press Office - Remarks by the President at LGBT Pride Month Reception


THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
____________________________________________________
For Immediate Release May 27, 2009

PRESS BRIEFING BY
PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
Q Okay. And just a separate question. Today in California, Ted Olson, former Solicitor General for President Bush, and David Boies, are introducing a lawsuit against the state of California, saying that by denying same-sex couples the right to marry, the ability to marry they are violating the Equal Protection Rights under the U.S. Constitution for same-sex couples. Why are they wrong?

MR. GIBBS: I have not read the opinion or --

Q The President supports the idea that people should be able to -- same-sex couples should be able to enter in civil unions. Boies and Olson -- a very conservative lawyer -- are saying that is a violation --

MR. GIBBS: Olson. (Laughter.)

Q Not Boies, right -- Olson, a very conservative lawyer, saying that is a violation of the Constitution. It is also the position the President holds, that there should be civil unions, not same-sex marriage. Why is it not a violation of the Equal Protection clause?

MR. GIBBS: Jake, let me have somebody take a look at the pleading that they're going to make. I don't know what they're arguing --

Q Generally. Just forget the specific argument; I'm just talking about their general argument is that by having -- by not allowing same-sex couples to marry, it is a violation of equal protection.

MR. GIBBS: Right, well, again --

Q And that's the President's position, so --

MR. GIBBS: But let me -- well, the President's position, we're all aware of. I hesitate to be general about the legal underpinnings of an argument based on some portion of the Constitution. I think that they may be somewhat hard to generalize. So let me have somebody take a look at that and see if we have anything based on what Mr. Olson and Mr. Boies are doing.
The White House - Press Office - Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 5/27/2009


THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
__________________________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release June 19, 2009

PRESS BRIEFING
BY
PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
Q There's The Wall Street Journal report that President Obama wants to include civil unions to be counted in the census. Can you talk about that? Is that something the President wants?

MR. GIBBS: Well, I think, obviously, as we've discussed, the President and the administration are committed to a fair and accurate count of all Americans. And as the piece said, we're in the midst of determining the best way to ensure that gay and lesbian couples are accurately counted.

Q And just to follow up on John Berry's call that we had the other day when the President signed the memorandum, he talked about the need for a specific number of votes to fulfill the President's campaign promise of repealing "don't ask, don't tell" and the Defense of Marriage Act, and he kept saying 60 votes in the Senate. But is the White House talking to Republicans that might favor the repeal of this? I know there are a few.

MR. GIBBS: Yes, look, I think the administration -- well, obviously, for math purposes, we're going to have to have a coalition of people that believe, on each of those interests, that the policy isn't serving our nation well. And the President is committed to making progress on both of those issues.
The White House - Press Office - Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 6-19-09


THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release June 29, 2009

PRESS BRIEFING
BY
PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
Q Following on that, the President has talked about repealing "don't ask, don't tell," and also the Defense of Marriage Act. So I'm wondering if you can tell me what specific steps has he taken to do this? What is his timeline for doing it? And also --

MR. GIBBS: I think we got a fairly similar question a minute ago, but I'll try to --

Q -- there's legislation apparently moving through House to repeal "don't ask, don't tell," I think it's H.R. 1283, and he hasn't endorsed it. Why not?

MR. GIBBS: I can certainly talk to legislative affairs about what that piece of legislation would do. As I said earlier, the President has been involved in, personally, meetings on this topic with stakeholders, including those at the Pentagon.

Q What about members of Congress?

MR. GIBBS: I don't know if he's met specifically with members of Congress on that. I know that -- I can try to get a list, I know that staff has worked here on the issue. It's a commitment that he intends to keep.

Q Can you talk a little bit more about the meetings that he's had, what --

MR. GIBBS: No.

Q -- and how recent has he been in these meetings?

MR. GIBBS: Since January 20.
The White House - Press Office - Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 6-29-09



I'm not trying to prolong the off topic but just to show that one can acquire source material for a topic.
 
Palin's Resignation Leaves Wake of Wildlife Devastation: Parnell Has Opportunity to Chart New Science-Based Path
The following statement from Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund President Rodger Schlickeisen is in response to the resignation of Alaska governor, Sarah Palin:

"Governor Palin's surprise resignation comes at a crucial point for wildlife and wild places in Alaska. In the just two and a half years of her term, she has made a series of decisions that prove she had absolutely no interest in being an environmental steward of the unique natural treasure that is Alaska.

"Instead, Governor Palin ignored our nation's leading wildlife laws and filed senseless lawsuits to pursue her anti-wildlife agenda. Palin's increasingly extreme anti-wildlife management policies included shooting wolves from airplanes and helicopters, using airplanes to track black and brown bears then shooting them from the ground, and the gassing of wolf pups in their dens. She even targeted wolves that had been part of a fifteen year long scientific study conducted by the National Park Service. All this, as well as her decision to fight much needed protections for both polar bears and Cook Inlet beluga whales, shows her blatant disregard for both science and environmental laws.

"Her efforts were, and still are, a threat to the natural integrity of America's last frontier, a state that boasts many national wildlife refuges, forests, parks and other federal lands, covering more than 200 million acres of the state. And if this isn't enough, Palin's persistent denial of global warming is sure to fast make her a political relic.

"Palin's successor, Lieutenant Governor Sean Parnell, must now decide whether he intends to extend Palin's devastating and destructive wildlife legacy even further, or whether he intends to chart a new path, by removing politics from wildlife management and restoring science to the decision making process. He can be sure that Defenders will be paying close attention to his decisions."

###

The Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund (Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund) provides a powerful voice in Washington to Americans who value our conservation heritage. Through grassroots lobbying, issue advocacy and political campaigns, the Action Fund champions those laws and lawmakers that protect wildlife and wild places while working against those that do them harm.

:
 
I think you went over the top, Reba. That's a good thing! Now, everyone, repeat after me: If Reba can do it, so can I!
 
Back
Top