Your Electoral Vote prediction for Tuesday..

Status
Not open for further replies.
sablescort

sablescort

New Member
Joined
May 1, 2003
Messages
3,504
Reaction score
0
Time to predict how many electoral votes will be needed to win the Presidency on Tuesday.... 270 EV's out of 538 is needed to win the election

My prediction going out on a limb is:

Obama 414 McCain 124

I'm even going better..how about a 538-0 blowout of EPIC proportions? It would be nice, but I dont think its gonna happen.

There's a easy way for you to figure out your EV prediction:

U. S. Electoral College

And a link for AD'ers who are not familiar with the Presidential Electoral Vote process:

NARA | Federal Register | U.S. Electoral College
 
I couldn't get the tally to work. I don't know how many electoral votes Obama will win by, but I know it will be more than 300.
 
They will tie - WE ARE GOING INTO OVERTIME!! LOL
 
SC, given the wide margin of electoral votes between Obama and McCain, you really think there will be a tie?
 
Hear Again said:
SC, given the wide margin of electoral votes between Obama and McCain, you really think there will be a tie?
Click to expand...

It was meant to be amusing, but then again, anything goes. (Think about it, Kerry was the likely prediction, how did Bush win it?)
 
SCBassist said:
It was meant to be amusing, but then again, anything goes. (Think about it, Kerry was the likely prediction, how did Bush win it?)
Click to expand...

Bush won it thanks to a miracle from G*d. :giggle: If it had not been for the state of Ohio being asked to recount their votes, I highly doubt Bush would have won the election in 2004. Same goes for the election re: Florida in 2000.
 
Hear Again said:
Bush won it thanks to a miracle from G*d. :giggle: If it had not been for the state of Ohio being asked to recount their votes, I highly doubt Bush would have won the election in 2004. Same goes for the election re: Florida in 2000.
Click to expand...

Hey, using God in this context is crossing the line bro. He does not have a preference for either candidate, as all people are seen the same in his eyes. I'm talking about the fluctuations in probability here.
 
SCBassist said:
Hey, using God in this context is crossing the line bro. He does not have a preference for either candidate, as all people are seen the same in his eyes. I'm talking about the fluctuations in probability here.
Click to expand...

For your information, I'm not a "bro" (I'm female) and my comment was strictly in jest (note: giggle emoticon). If you can't take a joke, I suggest you take a chill pill and relax. :roll:
 
SCBassist said:
Hey, using God in this context is crossing the line bro. He does not have a preference for either candidate, as all people are seen the same in his eyes. I'm talking about the fluctuations in probability here.
Click to expand...

How do you know that? Do you have a direct link? Reason I asked is cause He says He sets up kingdoms and tears them down. From that reasoning, He does have a preference and always gets his way.
 
Secretblend said:
How do you know that? Do you have a direct link? Reason I asked is cause He says He sets up kingdoms and tears them down. From that reasoning, He does have a preference and always gets his way.
Click to expand...

Good point, Secretblend! :D
 
Secretblend said:
How do you know that? Do you have a direct link? Reason I asked is cause He says He sets up kingdoms and tears them down. From that reasoning, He does have a preference and always gets his way.
Click to expand...

SCBassist is right, preference for others??? If kingdoms fall, I'd say the devils in the picture. :roll:
 
Hear Again said:
For your information, I'm not a "bro" (I'm female) and my comment was strictly in jest (note: giggle emoticon). If you can't take a joke, I suggest you take a chill pill and relax. :roll:
Click to expand...

Speaking of funny:

I did the experiment and came up with a dead heat.

R 269
D 269

I think we're in deep doo-doo! :laugh2:
 
if there is Electoral Vote tie, doesn't the senate vote then???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top