Here's the problem. A doctor is a medical professional, not an expert in all things related to deaf babies and their futures. He should simply give the parents the physical facts (what kind of deafness the baby has) and then refer them to the appropriate agencies who can provide follow up. He should have present a representative from early intervention services who can present a complete package and answer questions from the parents. (Or at least make arrangements for them to meet as soon as possible.) Obviously, the parents will need more than one meeting before making any decisions. The first meeting should just be a reassurance that there are options, and give them a broad outline of those options. It's way too much information to cover in the initial meeting.
My following example is not related to deafness but still has some application.
When my son-in-law had a traumatic injury that required immediate amputation of his lower right leg, other than immediate surgical follow up, he had little contact with doctors after. In fact, he found the doctors to be of little help. Other than a post-surgery check-up, he had no more contact with the surgeon. What really helped him was immediate contact from the amputee support group. The representative, and subsequent meetings with the support group, provided a lot more real-life practical help, in all areas of life. They and rehab services were the best ways to recovery and success.
The application is that, doctors are best for doctoring. They can help with immediate medical needs (testing, clearing up ear infections or obstructions, healing any underlying problems). Early intervention professionals and parent support groups are probably a lot more helpful to the babies' parents, especially in the long run. In early intervention I would also include deaf community representatives.
Just my opinion.
Who wanted me dead when I was a kid growing up deaf? I have no ****ing idea.
