Will You Be Safer IF Guns Are Banned?

Angel

♥"Concrete Angel"♥
Premium Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
19,062
Reaction score
4
"Violence is out of control. Guns are a major cause. They all should be banned -- the sooner the better." That's what many Americans seem to believe. As a result, a nationwide movement to ban all guns is growing.

Legislation is now pending in Congress to confiscate all handguns, register all guns, and tax ammunition up to 500%. Others want to go much farther. Within a few years it could be illegal for you to buy any guns or ammunition.

If you already own guns, you may be required to turn them in to the government -- under penalty of fine and imprisonment.

On February 28, 1994, Treasury Secretary Lloyd Bentsen announced the reclassification of several 12-gauge revolver-action shotguns. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) announced they would trace the owners, and order them to be fingerprinted and register with the BATF within 30 days or face a $250,000 fine and 10 years imprisonment.

In some cities -- like Chicago -- police have already begun warrantless, door-to-door searches of public housing projects for guns.

Will gun prohibition make you and your family safer? The evidence from cities in the US where guns have already been virtually banned is not reassuring.

BANNING GUNS DOESN'T KEEP THEM OUT OF THE HANDS OF VIOLENT CRIMINALS.

If banning guns worked, Washington, D.C. and New York would be the safest cities in the country. Since 1976, it's been illegal in Washington, D.C. to own any handguns or to keep any type of gun in your home unlocked and fully assembled. However, Washington D.C. is the "murder capital of the United States."

New York City has had severe gun control laws since 1911, yet it also ranks among the most dangerous places in the country. In both cities, violent criminals can easily obtain the most deadly weapons on the streets within minutes.

A national gun ban won't help. With an estimated 220+ million guns now in the U.S., an un-policeable 12,000 miles of borders and coastlines,and the world's largest stock of precision machine tools, criminals will always be able to buy, steal, or make guns and ammunition.

A competent backyard mechanic can build a rifle or handgun. Even Afghan peasants, using tools considerably inferior to those in the Sears catalog, have built machine guns capable of firing Soviet AK-47 cartridges.

Illegal home production of handguns is already a fact of life; a BATF study found that one-fifth of the guns seized by police in Washington, D.C. were homemade.

THE POLICE CANNOT PROTECT YOU -- BUT YOU CAN PROTECT YOURSELF.

If a criminal attacks you on the street or in your home, you cannot afford to wait 30 minutes, 20 minutes, or even 10 minutes for the police to arrive -- assuming that you even get the chance to call police and they respond. Ten minutes is more than enough time for a thug to rob, rape, murder, or cripple you for life.

Making guns illegal will primarily disarm peaceful citizens. That gives a green light for violent criminals to attack everyone -- both gun owners and non-owners alike.

In Los Angeles, during the 1992 "Rodney King Riots," police abandoned entire neighborhoods. Live TV broadcasts showed hoodlums burning homes and businesses, and dragging innocent motorists from their cars -- beating and killing them. The police did nothing to protect them. The only thing that prevented entire communities from being burned to the ground were community residents barricading their streets and using their guns to protect their homes and families.

In fact, the Supreme Court has ruled that you as an individual have no right to protection by the police. Their only obligation is to protect "society" -- whatever that means. So if you want to protect your home and family, you have to rely upon yourself. And self defense does work, for example:


"Her family taken hostage by her daughter's ex-boyfriend, Barbara Holt of Kearns, Utah and her husband were threatened with death, then forced into the bathroom of their home. When the man, armed with a rifle, went into the kitchen with her daughter, Holt slipped into the bedroom and got her .22 pistol. Holt fired a single shot, hitting the assailant in the head, stopping the attack." [From the Salt Lake City Tribune.]

"Thomas Terry of Anniston, Alabama was eating in a local restaurant late one evening when several armed men came in and announced a robbery. As the robbers tried to herd everyone into a walk-in cooler, Terry tried to escape through a locked door but alerted the crooks to his presence. When one approached the table where he was hiding, Terry pulled his .45, killed that man in an exchange of shots, and wounded his accomplice. A third criminal fled." (The Star, Anniston. Ala.)

Every day, thousands of peaceful Americans successfully use guns to defend themselves. A recent study by Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck found that Americans use guns defensively 2.5 million times a year.

A GUN IN YOUR HOME?

Statistics are often quoted to argue that if you own a gun it's more likely to be used to harm you -- by a family member or by an intruder -- than to be used by you to protect yourself. For example, a widely quoted study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that gun owners were 2.7 times at risk of being murdered as those without guns. But even the study's author admitted that this doesn't prove that guns cause their owners to be murdered. After all, people who are already at risk of being murdered are more likely to get guns for self-protection.

The New England study also ignored all of the cases in which a gun in the house was used defensively without causing a fatality. Such cases account for 99% of all defensive uses of a gun. When this data is taken into account, you find you are safer with a gun in the house.

Other data supports this finding. Between 1965 and 1985, the stock of privately-owned handguns has increased rapidly -- by over 1 million a year. But the rates of spousal homicide fell during the same period.

What about gun accidents? As nationally-syndicated columnist Samuel Francis explained in a Washington Times article, there are 220 million guns in the country. Your chance of dying from accidental discharge of any one of these is extremely remote (one chance in 200,000). In fact, you are 29 times more likely to die from an automobile accident than from the accidental discharge of a gun.

As long as you are a law-abiding, responsible person, owning a gun does not endanger you and could save your life in an emergency.

GUN PROHIBITION WON'T WORK IN AMERICA

While a few Western democracies -- like Britain -- have successfully disarmed their citizens, that would be impossible in the U.S. Our traditions of independence and individual self-defense are simply not conducive to the peaceful disarmament of America's estimated 80 million gun owners. As one Congressman commented, "In Germany, if parliament passed a 45 mile-per-hour speed limit, people would obey it -- then kick out their representatives in the next election. In the U.S. no one would pay any attention to it. Americans wake up every morning thinking 'What's the angle? How can I get around the law?' "

Disarming otherwise law-abiding citizens would simply put us at the mercy of well-armed criminals. Given a choice between obeying the law and being able to continue to defend our homes, our families, and our lives -- millions of Americans will gladly break the law. Many already do.

Only 1% of residents of Denver and Boston have voluntarily complied with laws requiring them to register their semi-automatic weapons. In New York City there are an estimated 700,000 to 3 million unregistered firearms. In California, less than 2% of the 2 million owners of semi-automatic rifles have registered their guns in compliance with state law -- even though failure to register is a felony!

It may not even be possible to enforce a gun ban. The New York State commissioner of prisons testified that if 1% of illegal gun owners in New York City were caught, tried, and sent to prison for a year, the state prison system would collapse.

GUN PROHIBITION COULD DESTROY AMERICA

America was born as an armed society. Guns are an integral part of our traditions and remain essential for the preservation of our safety and our liberty.

Today more than ever we need our guns to protect ourselves from rampaging criminals and to deter would-be tyrants. The mere presence of many guns in many American households is enough to deter many would-be aggressors.

Gun prohibition won't keep guns out of the hands of criminals or make us safe. But the attempt to ban guns could destroy this nation. The image of paramilitary SWAT-teams invading our homes to confiscate our guns is abhorrent to everything America stands for. Yet that is precisely where gun prohibition is taking us.

Regardless of the penalties for disobedience, millions of Americans will not peacefully surrender their guns. Many normally honest and law-abiding citizens will lie, evade, and perhaps kill to defend their rights. There are perhaps millions who share the sentiments of George Mason University professor and nationally syndicated columnist Walter Williams who recently editorialized, "You'll know Williams is disarmed
when Williams is dead."

The bitter irony of gun prohibition is that laws intended to make America safe could spark the bloodiest violence in our history. Gun prohibition is not good for you, your family, or America.


WILL YOU BE SAFER IF GUNS ARE BANNED? David Kopel Independence Institute, Second Amendment, gun rights, gun control


What do you guys think of this?...Will you feel safer IF guns :)rifle: ) were banned? ..:dunno:
 
I will feel very safer when guns are banned.

Also, need get vote to repeal on second amendment to remove the rights of guns.
 
For myself I definitely don't think banning guns is the answer but I rather to see tighter gun control laws and more enforcement of the current laws is the answer along with stricter punishments because too many children die in gun accidents....
 
For myself I definitely don't think banning guns is the answer but I rather to see tighter gun control laws and more enforcement of the current laws is the answer along with stricter punishments because too many children die in gun accidents....

California have stricter gun laws...
 
I do wish banning guns would make us safe but I disagree on this, banning guns would make more crimes, it's better to make a stricter laws on guns.
 
Really Pacman? then explain me this? :( ...


The Facts About Kids and Guns

Each year, there are 34,000 gun-related deaths in the U.S. How many of those dead are children, and has that number increased in the last few years? Here are the facts.

Safety expert Gavin de Becker found out while researching his books, The Gift of Fear and Protecting the Gift, that:

Every day, about 75 American children are shot. Most recover — 15 do not.


The majority of fatal accidents involving a firearm occur in the home.

Gunshot wounds are the single most common cause of death for women in the home, accounting for nearly half of all homicides and 42 percent of suicides.

An adolescent is twice as likely to commit suicide if a gun is kept in the home.

More teenage boys in America die from gunfire than from car accidents.

Gunshot wounds are now the leading cause of death for teenage boys in America (white, African-American, urban, and suburban).
Researchers at familyeducation.com have collected the following statistics on kids and guns:

Twenty-nine percent of high-school boys have at least one firearm; most are intended for hunting and sporting purposes.
Six percent say they carry a gun outside the home.
The National Institute of Justice, 1998

From 1980 to 1997, gun killings by young people age 18 to 24 increased from about 5,000 to more than 7,500.
During the same period, gun killings by people 25 and older fell by almost half, to about 5,000.
The U.S. Department of Justice

There are about 60 million handguns in the United States.
About 2 to 3 million new and used handguns are sold each year.
U.S. Senate Statistics

Nearly 500 children and teenagers each year are killed in gun-related accidents.
About 1,500 commit suicide.
Nearly 7,000 violent crimes are committed each year by juveniles using guns they found in their own homes.
Senator Herb Kohl, sponsor of the safety-lock measure.

Every day in 1994, 16 children age 19 and under were killed with guns, and 64 were wounded in this country.
National Center for Health and Statistics, 1996


Quaker - FamilyEducation.com
 
I still prefer to keep my gun.

Guns are for protection.

If we don't have a gun, how do we protect ourselves.

If we take guns away from criminals, that's not going to stop they. They will use knives, bats, or anything else that's just as deadly. :roll:
 
Old saying...If you outlaw guns, only outlaws have guns. Ummm, is that supposed to make me feel safer? I don't think so...
 
Old saying...If you outlaw guns, only outlaws have guns. Ummm, is that supposed to make me feel safer? I don't think so...
:werd:

If we ban guns, the percentage of criminals that own guns will increase and the percentage of non-criminals that own guns will decrease. Not a good idea. :nono:
 
what about the right to hunt, protect, and feel safe?

what if there's iraq soliders come to US and shoot us.. i will want to have the gun by that time if they ever come!

i disagree about banning gun laws
 
As a future member of the NRA, I strongly disagree about banning guns. I need the gun to protect my property, family, and myself.

USA isn't only problem about gun control. Look at the world...There are lot of guns. Billions of guns. Africa is probably still killing each other for diamonds or more. Africa and Middle Eastern has a large of the group like mercenaries. South America is probably still killing each other for drugs. I don't know IF it's continuing.

And, 2nd Amendent must NOT to be abolish. End of it.
 
I personally believe that we shouldhave stricter laws, but I also have to say that the guns are not the problem. The reasons that people use the guns for violent acts is the problem, and until we address the why of the behavior, we are not going to see any improvement in rates of violent crime, I'm afraid.
 
:werd:

If we ban guns, the percentage of criminals that own guns will increase and the percentage of non-criminals that own guns will decrease. Not a good idea. :nono:

yes, that's correct, it happen when US banned Alcohol and it getting worst crime in ridiculous way.
 
I don't know. People will always find alternative ways for guns. They might even make weapons of their own.
 
I support guns for our protection. It is not that simple because we have no choice because thousands of criminals hide their illegal guns. We never know that there are some killer cops out there along with the criminals.

I agree with you that there are so many guns around the world. I don't care about England because it won't show you or British something happen in the newspaper. All I know is that Washington D.C. has the highest crime in the nation, and the government refuses to allow the newspaper publishers in that area because of international tour for gov't business-money.

Now, some police have their stun-gun. In fact, that gun is not safe. It can kill them with too powerful volt.

For teenagers, they did it on purpose because their parents do not even know that their teenagers are planning to commit suicide. They want to protect their family. Actually, they should have a lock device for all guns especially they have children and young teenagers in their house.

Adult-teenagers are considered okay without using the lock device. The parents need to have a best judgement to see if they are really grown up and understood the difference between right and wrong.
 
As a future member of the NRA, I strongly disagree about banning guns. I need the gun to protect my property, family, and myself.

USA isn't only problem about gun control. Look at the world...There are lot of guns. Billions of guns. Africa is probably still killing each other for diamonds or more. Africa and Middle Eastern has a large of the group like mercenaries. South America is probably still killing each other for drugs. I don't know IF it's continuing.

And, 2nd Amendent must NOT to be abolish. End of it.

All amendment can be repealed like happened to Alcohol.

In UK asnd Japan, they have much low murder rate than in USA since their guns are banned.

For me, I don't need guns, they are pointless...
 
All amendment can be repealed like happened to Alcohol.

In UK asnd Japan, they have much low murder rate than in USA since their guns are banned.

For me, I don't need guns, they are pointless...

Well, that's true about the alcohol during late 1920's or early 1930's. But they are legal for above 21.

England and Japan are smaller population and country than USA has. It will be hard to control whole country if the US gov't banned the guns like Vampy's opinion, about after we banned the guns. And PowerON about after banned the alcohol during 20's and 30's.

That's fine with me if you don't need the gun. But I don't think they are pointless. They can be useful as self-defend.
 
Back
Top