- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,899
- Reaction score
- 1,518
You say yes, and Foxrac says no. Which is it?...Yes.
Does it actually prevent minors from buying the games in retail stores?
You say yes, and Foxrac says no. Which is it?...Yes.
I've not seen anything showing that making sexual contents of media no longer illegal to purchase or own by minors in any way increases child abuse, sexual deviancy (unless you think dirty things like blowjobs are "deviant"), or any of the other bogeymen mentioned.
As I've pointed out, self-regulation certainly can work. It doesn't have to be government enforced.
I'm in favor of keeping forms of media self-regulated, as they are. I don't see the need for increased government regulation, which eventually leads to crap like the FCC who slaps million dollar fines on TV stations when they let a character say "fuck" or something else stupid like that.
So to clarify, no, I don't especially think young children should be purchasing M-rated video games, R-rated movies, or anything similar to that. But at the same time, I don't think the government needs to step in to regulate it, especially when the primary reason the government regulations are being created is because of the medium, rather than the content. If the proponents of this law equally tried to force the government to regulate the sale of books, movies, magazines, music, etc, then I'd still oppose it, but for different reasons. This law was for the purpose of treating video games inherently differently from other forms of media.
Because "IT'S FOR THE CHILDREN" isn't a persuasive argument, especially when you don't give a valid reason as to how it's harming children. A couple of news stories about crazy people isn't a valid reason, either.
I agree that sex isn't necessarily what porn shows, just as much as I agree that love isn't what Disney shows and people aren't what reality TV shows.
You say yes, and Foxrac says no. Which is it?
Does it actually prevent minors from buying the games in retail stores?
Sorry, we don't agree. I remain unconvinced....my point was that you'd come out of it with the child handing you back your $50 because Target wouldn't sell the game to them. Way to miss the point.
Then let it be up to the parents, rather than up to the government.
You say yes, and Foxrac says no. Which is it?
Does it actually prevent minors from buying the games in retail stores?
Sorry, we don't agree. I remain unconvinced.
It is up to the parents.
any one remembers Postal 2?
You say yes, and Foxrac says no. Which is it?
Does it actually prevent minors from buying the games in retail stores?
and I am looking forward to that game.![]()