Beowulf said:I have always heard that there are three sides to an argument: your side, my side, and the truth.
![]()
Oakley_04 said:Hey, deaf258, Congs on your new SN
_\,,/truthmatters said:Dovete ottenere un lavoro perché avete troppo tempo sulle vostre mani! Prego smetta di denominarlo e lascilo solo. E ti amo, anche!_\,,/
To use Beowulf's statement as example; I don't believe that you are hearing... I strongly believe that you are deaf! But your side of the truth indicated that you are hearing. The truth of audiology exam confirmed that you are hearing.Oceanbreeze said:Well, I'm hearing, so you know I don't get it!
As I've said before in other threads, I like a good drama. I won't be a hypocrite and say I don't like a good melodrama once in awhile, but when it comes to people getting hurt, I draw the line. Especially, if that person is my friend!
I know I've done my fair share of adding to the chaos. I admit it. I also admit that it was probably wrong. And, I'm sorry. I really am.
I guess what I've realized that in order for change to occur, one must be apart of the solution and not the problem. That's the problem as I see it. We make ourselves apart of the problem when it's really not that important to begin, or it doesn't involve us. I'm veering off the point here a bit, and I know that this intent of this thread was to talk about real life situations. I'm restricting my comments to just my conduct on the messageboard, though. Because, really, folks... To me, this is just a message board. It's NOT real life. I don't take things seriously, and I really wish others didn't either. Especially when it comes to hurting another's feelings. What purpose is there in that? Does it really make you feel good to know you've bruised an ego alittle bit, or out right hurt someone?
I can honestly say I've done it, and it doesn't make me feel all that great.
but I must admit that I sometimes feel like I am losing my faith in humanity when certain situations & incidents come up... well, what else I can do but keep the faith in humanity regardless if it is transparent or not?Indeed.Magatsu said:Indeed. I am deaf and I never understand why these people tend to do that. I wish I have the answer for that but I don't.
truthmatters said:Dovete ottenere un lavoro perché avete troppo tempo sulle vostre mani! Prego smetta di denominarlo e lascilo solo. E ti amo, anche!_\,,/
truthmatters said:Thank you for raping my thread.
Good point. I think you just answer our question with that last comment: "just curious".The Heretic said:Indeed.
There's no good, solid answer for why people gossip, but the best place to start is studying the dynamics of group behavior, and that is found between sociology and psychology, or social psychology.
If we can establish a relatively plausible sketch of human psychology to describe motivations and hopefully explain them in a social setting, then we are halfway to a good answer why people gossip.
I think it has a lot to do with the deep, stark fascination we have for dirty and rather embarrassing secrets. Most of us enjoy the misfortune of others, even though we already know this is not a praiseworthy feeling.
Just curious
Magatsu said:Another few possibilities:
1) They are still stuck in their 'High School' stage. I am sure that all of us know how High School and their gossips are... Maybe, at certain point, they are unable to outgrow that 'stage';
2) They have extremely low self-esteem and they couldn't handle it.. so they inflict their 'low self-esteem' attacks on others through gossips/rumors to enable the ability to feel 'good' about themselves;
3) or as you said, it can be something related to psychology... something 'tick' in their minds and they suddenly became so desperate to make the rumors/gossips about others?
Good point. I can see what you mean because I saw these situations several times at some communities.Cookie Monster said:Those are very valid possibilites, have you considered that when people are cornered, they do lash out hence the "fight or flight" syndrome. I have seen this in many messageboards when a very vocal or strong-willed member shares his/her opinions/thoughts, members gangs up on him/her and this member is cornered. Their only way of rebutting back is to lash out.


Askjo said:I agree with you. However 2 things are acceptable and rejectable. To tell the truth is to hurt anyone, and not to hurt anyone, for example of Clinton and Monica. Not to hurt Monica, but to hurt Clinton. Clinton rejected the truth that anyone told against him until he was caught.
To tell the truth is the best to accept.
Yes, it's better to accept the truth, no matter either it's hurt or not because I ASK them to tell me the truth or they ASK me to tell them the truth.
To tell the truth is the best to reject.
I see nothing about reject on Clinton but liar.
I consider Clinton as liar because he did say the WORD that he did not know Monica in first place. The people searched the truth until they found the proof soon/later thru Clinton's sperm DNA. What Clinton did is belong to coward & pathetic.
I guess everything would be okay if Clinton tell them the truth in first place.
To me, I would admit the truth if the people found out about me. I know it's hurt but I has to face it.
Subject about rejection what you mentioned about Clinton is a different.
Example:
I often help people with work, etc. etc. etc. I know they take an avantage of me because of my soft heart. I realized that I should stay firm so I excuse them: "I have no time and don't know when etc". This is rejection, not lie. It's difference between liar and rejection. I admitted my truth to them when they noticed something wrong with me and got me talk and solve it with me.
It's not my problem if they doesn't bother to get me to talk after notice my rejection for months because they NEVER ask me to solve this issue with them. I will forgive them or they forgive me if we made our mistakes after admit the truth.
Magatsu said:Actually, I think "fight or flight" syndrome is not that bad as rumors/gossips/backstabs but that's just my opinion. We can 'see' or take their "fight or flight" comments into account while we often do not 'see' the rumors/gossips/backstabs that they did to us behind our backs. It is more hurtful in that way. Some of them would say, "that's life"... it is bullshit and they know it. Well, again it is just my opinion. Heh
Offtopic for a minute, is that Socrates in your signature picture? If so, tell her a big hello from me![]()

Ditto! I completely agree with you. That's what I rather to face, I mean for others to state the truth to my face than 'parrot' behind my back.Cookie Monster said:Granted, you are so correct about the gossipmongers/backstabbers because it is painful what they do behind our backs when we lay the trust in their hands. Like you say, it is fine when they do it in front of us because we can control the situation when gossipmongers/backstabbers twist the stories/lies. We are able to put them back in their places and tell our side(s) if we choose to stoop to their levels. Those who state "Que sera sera, C'est la vie, That's life!" I've no respect for them because they are participating in the story-twisting. I'd rather for a person to state the truth to my face than "flower his/her language", as my good friend poetically states to me.
Cookie Monster said:Off-topicing here.. Socrates says a big hello & hugs backatcha!!![]()
hugs back to her. Thank for telling her for me!Magatsu said:Good point. I think you just answer our question with that last comment: "just curious". Maybe, it is just pure curiousity? To satisfy their curiousity to see how it will affect some people when they are creating some hurtful gossips about other people?

Nesmuth said:Lots of deafs are irritated with truths that seems to go against the deaf society. They prefer to bury it and go on like smiling captains of a sinking ship.
Richard

