BradB08
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2008
- Messages
- 2,699
- Reaction score
- 4
But it was a joke based on a concept that is not applicable to the discussion.
What's the point if one can't crack jokes? I see there's a joke forum here, is there not?
But it was a joke based on a concept that is not applicable to the discussion.
Jillio, I have two handicaps. The ADA classifies both as disabilities.
I consider me pretty much a good productive citizen who is not that bothered by my handicaps that the government classifies as disabilities.
They are just descriptive words. I am not really that bothered by either one.
Do you feel the same when it is applied to you? And whether you see anything wrong with it or not, many individuals do see something wrong with it, and some are posters on this board. The word has a very negative connotation.
No, it is not verbose. It is actually more accurate. Simply because one has a disability does not mean that they are disabled. I know many people with various disabilities that have accomplished more than many folks without disabilities. Likewise, I know people with disabilities that are not in the least disabled.
You understand exactly what I am saying.
And, my point is that a person with a disability is not necessarily handicapped, nor are they necessarily disabled.

And throw eggs at AF!!!

What's the point if one can't crack jokes? I see there's a joke forum here, is there not?
I don't have a problem with jokes. I simply prefer them to be funny.

ok you're going waaaaayyyyy too far. Come back here and look at general use of the word. i don't really care about each one's specific situation. nobody does. do you want a parking sign to be verbose and specific - "parking reserved for a person with wheelchair or mobility disability" ???
"HANDICAPPED PARKING ONLY" - NUFF SAID! nothing offensive, nothing insensitive. please leave the political correction at home. If you wana talk about a person in your workplace or whatsoever - go ahead and use the sensitive wording but I ain't. Nobody takes offense anyway - only if you think they're stupid just because they're disabled/handicapped/etc.
If they do take offense of certain wording - well.... they can go :madfawk: themselves![]()
Yeah, only a golfer would find that funny I'm sure.
Whatever.![]()
Actually, I just told it to a golfer, and he simply looked at me. He didn't find it funny, either.
Would you be bothered by the use of either one if they caused negative perceptions of you and your abilities?
Yes, the ADA does use the term "disabilities". But they also use it in the context of a person having a disability, and not in the context of that person being disabled.
You have a point and I think they do cause negative perceptions. But I think it is a fact of life that I may have to try harder to overcome them.
You're a piece of work.
Nah, I offended someone so I felt I had to.
What about a person who "has" a handicap as opposed to a "handicapped" person or the person is "handicapped"?
tongue twister!
You're a piece of work.
I know.
BTW....We need to be back on topic.
![]()
Oh...okay.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sarcasm at its best!
Byrdie. And now back to our regularly scheduled show.I think Jillio is the one that wields the whip better.

So, I've been told.![]()
That's a compliment.
Yes, I realize that.