Strike shuts down NYC transit system

Alex

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2003
Messages
4,225
Reaction score
143
Under threat of legal action, more than 30,000 New York City transit workers went on strike early Tuesday, shutting down the nation's largest public transportation system just days ahead of Christmas.

"Transit workers are tired of being underappreciated and disrespected," said TWU President Roger Toussaint. "The Local 100 executive board has voted overwhelmingly to extend strike action to all MTA properties immediately."

According to Ainsley Stewart, a Transit Workers Union vice president, the walkout was called after the executive board for the TWU rejected an offer made late Monday by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The vote was 28 to 10 with five abstentions, Stewart said. (Watch the union leader announce the strike -- 3:55)

MTA President Peter Kalikow responded quickly and forcefully, threatening the union with legal action under the Taylor Law, which forbids public employees from walking off the job.

"The TWU's action today is illegal and irresponsible," he said. "This blatant violation of the Taylor Law and the judge's injunction is slap in the face to all MTA customers and all New Yorkers."

A New York judge last week issued a preliminary injunction barring the transit union from staging a strike.

The Taylor Law allows for a fine of two days pay' for each day of a illegal strike.

Kalikow said New York's attorney general and MTA lawyers would begin contempt proceedings against the union.

With the strike announcement, members of the Transit Workers Union (TWU) began shutting down the city's trains, buses and subways, affecting more than 7 million people who use the system on a typical day.

"As always, Local 100 members will meet our responsibility for the safety of our riders, for the safety of all transit workers, and for the safe maintenance of the equipment we will use when we get a fair contract and return to work," a statement on Web site for TWU Local 100 said.

"Local 100 members shall make sure that the subways are buses are shut down safely and efficiently at the beginning of the strike. Local 100 members shall then make sure that the system stays shut down for the duration of the strike."

'Illegal and morally reprehensible '
City officials have said a transit strike could cost the city as much as $400 million a day.

The union's strike announcement angered New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

"Tonight, Roger Toussaint and the TWU have taken the illegal and morally reprehensible action of ordering a citywide strike of our mass transit system," Bloomberg said.

"For their own selfish reasons, the TWU has decided that their demands are more important than the law, the city and the people they serve," the mayor added. (Watch the mayor vow to hit the union hard -- 3:12)

Bloomberg said a previously drawn-up contingency plan would be in effect for Tuesday morning's rush hour. That plan calls for the designation of HOV lanes, the establishment of police checkpoints and the adoption of a new fare structure for taxis.

The mayor also said the city would be joining the MTA in requesting an emergency hearing in front of Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Theodore Jones.

"We will seek to show that the TWU is in contempt of the court's earlier injunction and ask the court to impose severe fines on the union and its members," Bloomberg said.

New York Gov. George Pataki echoed Bloomberg's sentiments, saying the union has "broken the trust of the people of New York."

"They have not only endangered our city and state's economy, but they are also recklessly endangering the health and safety of each and every New Yorker," he said.

Issues: Wages, pensions, benefits
A partial strike began Monday -- more than 700 workers at a pair of private New York bus lines walked out, impacting some 50,000 commuters in Queens.

Hours before the strike, Toussaint said transit workers were prepared to lower their wage increase demands to below 6 percent if the MTA agreed to reduce the number of disciplinary actions launched against transit workers and grant other concessions.

The workers had been asking for an 8 percent annual wage increase.

Toussaint also chastised Pataki for threatening transit workers on television.

Pataki has pointed out that state law forbids strikes by public employees and that a transit walkout would be illegal.

"We do not appreciate being threatened on public television nonetheless and in front of our children, " Toussaint said. "Even if the governor needs this to appear to be tough to the nation for his own political ambitions, it's inappropriate."

Toussaint called on Pataki and Bloomberg to play a constructive role in the negotiations and restore state and city funds to the mass transit budget.

"If Gov. Pataki wants to play a constructive role he should get involved in these negotiations, and he should restore money to mass transit because ... the state government has taken out funds from mass transit ... (state funding) has gone down from 20 percent 10 to 15 years ago, to zero for capital funding," Toussaint said.

There were also signs that TWU workers will get the support of union leaders for Metro-North railroad, the second-largest commuter railroad in the country which shuttles some 250,000 commuters in and out of Manhattan every day.

The leaders of the TCU System Board No. 86 signaled their solidarity with workers on the MTA system but stopped short of threatening to strike in concert with them.

Russell Oathout, general chairman of No. 86, complained that his members also have been unsuccessful in negotiating a contract for its members for three years.

"A similar situation is in store for the MTA's Metro-North property if a fair agreement is not reached," Oathout warned in a news conference.

Union leaders and the MTA negotiated Sunday but those talks did not produce any agreement with key issues such as health benefits, pensions and wages remaining on the table.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/12/20/nyc.transit/index.html
 
Depriving people of much-needed and necessary rides to their destination is not a very wise way to go. =P
 
Now NYC folks understand how MN went through with 6 or 7 weeks of bus drivers strike in early 2004.... I was deprived of being indepdent to get around- had to depend on people for rides. It is no fun sit at home, miss classes, student senate mtgs, even couldn't go to the Capitol... I hope that they get things restored back in the order soon!
 
I support the union and hope that the workers win and have better paychecks and living conditions improve for the workers. I also hope the transportation labor issues are resolved soon. The city mayor should know better than to pay the workers very low wages when about 5 million people take the NYC transportation to work and the city then rakes in more money then pays out the workers low wages when the mayor can more than pay alittle more for the working family and still have plenty left over for their fiscal year end budget and the mayor still gets to go to Florida to play golf. The people of NYC should support the workers and see it to that they get paid a better paycheck. They not only would be able to attract and hire more employees for local NYC functions ( goverment , transportation, public works etc. ) It also would be a good boost for the worker's morale too which in turn makes for a very happy boss pleased with their performance percentages going up due to excellent work training and safer working conditions and better pay. :)
 
deafclimber said:
dude, i hope u have a scooter. :)

Hopefully you could ride on scooter too..

I want see you.. If you did!
:P

Ouch NYc strike shut down NYC tranist system.. I bet they want $ raise hourly or want Xmas bonus?

Simlair alike Toronto Trainist Commisors... prevouis strike for a week finally union agreed w/TTC co-workers want raised hourly.. Wha.. My Adopt Dad's prevouis Head of Quarter prez and no longer working.. He is retired!
 
A suggestion :

If I was you, I would take the hourly pay raise because it lasts much more longer than the one time Christmas bonus that they would mete out on the paychecks annually.
 
Previously, during illegal strikes:

During the postal strike of 1970, more than 10,000 troops of the National Guard provided security and helped to deliver the mail for New York City.

In 1981, the nation's air traffic controllers went on strike. President Reagan said, "Government cannot close down the assembly line. It has to provide without interruption the protective services which are government's reason for being.

It was in recongition of this that the Congress passed a law forbidding strikes by government employees against the public safety. Let me read the solemn oath taken by each of these employees, a sworn affidavit, when they accepted their jobs: 'I am not participating in any strike against the Government of the United States or any agency thereof, and I will not so participate while an employee of the Government of the United States or any agency thereof.'

"It is for this reason that I must tell those who fail to report for duty this morning they are in violation of the law, and if they do not report for work within 48 hours, they have forfeited their jobs and will be terminated."

And they were. Every single one of them that didn't report for work was fired.

To the chagrin of the PATCO strikers, and the surprise of nearly everyone else, the FAA's contingency plan functioned smoothly, minimizing the strike's effects. Approximately 3,000 supervisors joined 2,000 non-striking controllers and 900 military controllers in manning airport towers. The FAA ordered airlines at major airports to reduce scheduled flights by 50 percent during peak hours for safety reasons. Nearly 60 small airport towers were scheduled to be shut down indefinitely. The FAA's Oklahoma City training school, which normally produced 1,500 graduates per 17-21 week course, considered plans to increase that matriculation number to 5,500. (More than 45,000 people applied within four weeks of the strike's onset.) PATCO strikers made dire predictions about reduced air safety as a consequence of the 60-hour work week put in by their replacements, but in fact limited traffic and the extra monitoring efforts of the 33,000 Air Line Pilots Association members diminished the risk of an "aluminum shower," as controllers euphemistically called an air accident. Before long, about 80 percent of airline flights were operating as scheduled, while air freight remained virtually unaffected.
 
Well Reba, I would think that law should be changed to help workers have better paying wages except when it comes to National Security matters where the government really needs to stay functional... I also think when people are working in National Security matters, they should be paid a very good paycheck too as well as they have a family to look after too.
 
Whole NYC transit system are all out.. I remembered 2004 bus strike very well. Only Metro Transit was out but other providers that serves the subrubs such as MN Valley Transportation Authority, Southwest, BEELine, others was ones that up and running... NYC should have more additional providers. Where I live, it is provided by Metro Transit which I had no way to go- had to depend on people for ride or just stay home. The last resort was that Gov. Pawlenty had to jump into negotation, so they did worked things out then buses ran again.. No strike since 2004..
 
Heath said:
...they should be paid a very good paycheck too as well as they have a family to look after too.
Sometimes that is not enough to satisfy the unions. For example, about the air traffic controllers:

"There wasnt much support for the PATCO strikers. The public sided with the government and exhibited little sympathy for individuals whose earnings were already well above the national average."

About the striking transit workers of NYC:

"The union said the latest MTA offer included annual raises of 3 percent, 4 percent and 3.5 percent; the previous proposal included 3 percent raises each year. MTA workers earn between $47,000 and $55,000 annually. The MTA originally had demanded an 8 percent pay raise per year for their members.

Pension issues have been a major sticking point in the talks. The MTA wants to raise the age at which new employees become eligible for full pensions from 55 to 62, which the union says is unfair."
 
Reba said:
Sometimes that is not enough to satisfy the unions. For example, about the air traffic controllers:

"There wasnt much support for the PATCO strikers. The public sided with the government and exhibited little sympathy for individuals whose earnings were already well above the national average."

About the striking transit workers of NYC:

"The union said the latest MTA offer included annual raises of 3 percent, 4 percent and 3.5 percent; the previous proposal included 3 percent raises each year. MTA workers earn between $47,000 and $55,000 annually. The MTA originally had demanded an 8 percent pay raise per year for their members.

Pension issues have been a major sticking point in the talks. The MTA wants to raise the age at which new employees become eligible for full pensions from 55 to 62, which the union says is unfair."

Reba,

May I remind you that New York people work and reside in the city of New York becasue of high cost of living. They do not live in your state of North Carolina (Am I correct?). I do not accept national average statstics for New York public employees. That is pretty lower. Have you ever met public transportment employees in Big Apple? No wonder....
 
mld4ds said:
Reba,

May I remind you that New York people work and reside in the city of New York becasue of high cost of living. They do not live in your state of North Carolina (Am I correct?).
South Carolina. :)

I do not accept national average statstics for New York public employees. That is pretty lower.
I'm just reporting the facts.

Have you ever met public transportment employees in Big Apple? No wonder....
I have used public transportation in NYC. (I used to live in CT.) My late step-father was a city bus driver for many years, so I have some feeling for transportation workers. Have you met MTA employees in the Big Apple?
 
mld4ds said:
Reba,

May I remind you that New York people work and reside in the city of New York becasue of high cost of living. They do not live in your state of North Carolina (Am I correct?). I do not accept national average statstics for New York public employees. That is pretty lower. Have you ever met public transportment employees in Big Apple? No wonder....

Actually, Mld4ds for once here is correct. The costs of living in New York City is quite high in comparison to many other cities. From what I know, it's quite the norm for small one-bedroom apartments in seedy areas to go for at least $1,000 per month which is not WORTH the money and drain a lot out of your income. With an income of $30,000, $12,000 goes to the rent and hundreds or a thousand more go to the utilities along with the food bills... so you're really left with peanuts to save and live on.
 
So from what I've read part of the reason for the strike is they have Rodny Dangerfield syndrome and "Don't get any respect". How in hell do they think that this is going make matters better? They are going to get even less respect and more abuse now.
 
Back
Top