Mom Arrested After Giving Her 11-year-old a Tattoo

sara1981

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
7,870
Reaction score
72
Mom Arrested After Giving Her 11-year-old a Tattoo
Mom Arrested After Giving Her 11-year-old a Tattoo | Parenting - Yahoo! Shine

If your pre-teen wanted a tattoo, would you let her get one? A North Carolina mom who moonlights as a tattoo artist figured it would be fine, and now she's in trouble with police for giving her 11-year-old daughter a tattoo.

"She asked me to do it," 30-year-old Odessa Clay, who sports plenty of her own body art, told WCTI-TV. The tattoo is of a small heart near the girl's right shoulder.

Related: Would you let your 10-year-old get a tattoo?

Clay told the TV station that she thought minors could get tattoos as long as their parents approved; given that she's the girl's mother, she didn't think it would be a problem. Clay, who also hangs drywall and sells Mary Kay products, according to her public Facebook page, said that she used her own tattoo instruments and numbed her daughter's arm before permanently drawing on the outline of a heart.

"I didn't fill it in," she said, adding that the girl was not in any pain.

Given that she inked her daughter last year, but wasn't arrested until late September, Clay says that she thinks a former in-law told police about her daughter's body art in retaliation for the police report that Clay filed recently against her daughter's paternal grandfather. Clay is due in court next month to face a single count of tattooing a person under the age of 18, and has not been charged with child abuse.

At least her daughter's tattoo is tiny. In June, a 13-year-old boy in Washington state went on a trip with a family friend and returned with a 6-inch tattoo of a dragon on his chest.

"The parents were not happy about it," police told The Associated Press. "The parents would not have allowed or condoned it."

Almost every state requires parental permission in order to tattoo a minor; in North Carolina and 13 other states, kids under age 18 can't get tattoos even if their parents do approve. (You can find a state-by-state listing of body art regulations here.) The reasoning is that kids, no matter how savvy they seem, aren't mature enough to make life-altering decisions on their own.

Earlier this year, Chuntera Napier was arrested in Georgia and charged with child cruelty and being party to a crime after she allowed her 10-year-old son, Gaquan, to get a tattoo in honor of his late brother.

"I always thought if a parent gives consent, then it's fine," Napier said in January. "How can somebody else say it's not OK? He's my child, and I have a right to say what I want for my child."

What do you think, parents? Why is it acceptable to have your child's ears pierced, even multiple times, but illegal to allow them to get a tattoo?
 
you dont have to put the earings in,you stuck with tatoo...very wrong to tat preteen
 
...If your pre-teen wanted a tattoo, would you let her get one? A North Carolina mom who moonlights as a tattoo artist figured it would be fine, and now she's in trouble with police for giving her 11-year-old daughter a tattoo.

"She asked me to do it," 30-year-old Odessa Clay, who sports plenty of her own body art, told WCTI-TV. The tattoo is of a small heart near the girl's right shoulder.

...Clay told the TV station that she thought minors could get tattoos as long as their parents approved; given that she's the girl's mother, she didn't think it would be a problem....
If she works professionally as a tattoo artist, then certainly she would know the laws that pertain to tattooing in her state and locality. She has no excuse.

Does she do everything that her daughter asks for? This woman's judgment is questionable.
 
Interesting tattoo and ci are the same basic things. How funny laws are. they both are cosmetic thingy.
 
Interesting tattoo and ci are the same basic things. How funny laws are. they both are cosmetic thingy.
:confused:

A CI has a function. Do you really know someone who got one just for its look? If that were the case, people could get fake ones.
 
Interesting tattoo and ci are the same basic things. How funny laws are. they both are cosmetic thingy.

:shock: what??:shock:wait what??!!??:shock: ooooooooh no you didn't


that's just, :shock: you know, high heels and a prosthetic leg, they're almost the same thing right?

I had the same thought when I read the article Reba. All of those kids that got inked, their artists should have known the law. Makes me wonder what an artist has to do to get a tattoo business license.....or if they went to people who didn't have one. I'm going with the latter. My daughter wants her ear pierced up top, the helix. I got mine done 21 years ago at the mall. Now they won't pierce you there anymore at the mall, walmart where ever, you have to go to a body piercing shop. So I went to find out how much it'd be. He wanted to know how old she is, 12. Okay, so I or a legal guardian would have to bring her and we need to bring her birth certificate and a copy of a recent physical. And that's just to pierce her ear!!!!!! I can't believe the people that did is actually operate a business.
 
Ha. Chill out. ;) I just stated my opinion and done with it then i have move on. :)
 
No tattoo's for teens...my boys had to wait until they were 18, and paid for it themselves...Still, I'm not too happy with the ones they got.
 
Interesting tattoo and ci are the same basic things. How funny laws are. they both are cosmetic thingy.

When did tattoos serve medical needs? The woman should have her license yanked and be forced to shut down her business. Anyone that lacks this basic God given common sense shouldn't be allowed to operate a business of this kind. And she should pay for the laser removal. What an idiot.

Laura
 
When did tattoos serve medical needs? The woman should have her license yanked and be forced to shut down her business. Anyone that lacks this basic God given common sense shouldn't be allowed to operate a business of this kind. And she should pay for the laser removal. What an idiot.

Laura

I doubt she has one, didn't it say she 'dabbled"? I knew a guy that "dabbled" he didn't have a license, he didn't even have a shop. I never got one from him, I'm going to though soon I hope he has a shop and license now this was like 20 years ago. Anyway he had a lot of clients anyway, what he'd do is order a set of tat needles whenever he got a new client, you'd have to wait to get your tat til the order came in, then he'd take your set and put them in a container and lable it with your name incase back. Which most people did because he's awesome :D
 
Never knew it was against the law to ink kids in some states. Although I never would have consented to a tattoo for my kid, I am not sure I see the need for a law. :dunno:
 
I don't know about illegal to have permanent tattoo on child, so kinda surprised to see article.

For me, I'm not going let child to have tattoo until they are adult, because they will have own decision.
 
:confused:

A CI has a function. Do you really know someone who got one just for its look? If that were the case, people could get fake ones.

Yup, FDA approved CI for child, but they don't approve for tattoo.
 
I saw some teens (15-17 years old) have tattoo in anywhere, especially mall.
 
Interesting tattoo and ci are the same basic things. How funny laws are. they both are cosmetic thingy.
Oh yeh.... Same thing...
Why wear an earring when you can have a BTE hanging on your ear..

Have to save this post for future reference...
 
Back
Top