- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 144
she has been banned...*sighs*
somebody passes me the blunt dammit. i might be able to communicate with her telepathically

she has been banned...*sighs*
I'm sorry but are you a licensed psychologist? or psychiatrist? I don't think you are qualified to say that. beside - none of scientific studies have said anything like yours. please stop inventing things.
not true. excessive amounts of marijuana can result in auditory and/or visual hallucinations as well as mania (the latter being a symptom of bipolar disorder).
I'm not a psychiatrist or psychologist and I'm not inventing anything. I've seen it happen. Common sense, folks. You don't need a Ph.D. or a Psy.D. to see that you can become addicted to anything.
somebody passes me the blunt dammit. i might be able to communicate with her telepathically![]()
I'm not a psychiatrist or psychologist and I'm not inventing anything. I've seen it happen. Common sense, folks. You don't need a Ph.D. or a Psy.D. to see that you can become addicted to anything.
This is going to be a an "idiotic question" but how can you tell if you are blind?![]()
Again - scientific & medical studies have shown NO SUCH studies of linking marijuana to addiction. Please show me otherwise.
Yes, it needs to be legalized and taxed...there is a high demand for it.
I don't want to point fingers but some people get the negative conception of marijuana. It may be due to all the stuff you're taught through school and from your parents+kin that drugs are bad, friends, but marijuana has its medical uses and that is why the topic is so controversial.
Marijuana is known to destroy cells due to the inhaling of fumes, inhaling any fumes is detrimental to the cell production in your nasal and lung passageways.
But that is not my point, and that's about as far as it does negative. And its not even that bad when the benefits exceed destroying cilia cells. Marijuana has shown positive effects in various forms of medical usage... There isn't much "solid" stuff backing it up, but if the people feel a lot better with it personally, its their choice.
Indeed.
The problem is - There are a lot of politics involved in this. They will argue and to claim that marijuana is not safe. Sure, Marijuana may have it's own complications but it is no different than any other substances that are held out there.
What they don't realize is - It can be maintained and enforced but however, the question is - Just exactly how can it be met on a medium and/or a common ground?
actually yes you do need ph.d or psy.d to make a statement like that.
I can show you otherwise. My dad, my brother, people in my school.
2 words - pharmaceutical companies. they spent millions, if not - billions, to lobby and to shape public view on marijuana. As you can see - they were incredibly effective at this.
My dad and several of my family members are alcoholics...should alcohol be illegal as well? I guess it should be since it screws up many lives.
We're using two different definitions of "addictive." You're talking about the kind of addiction that is at the neurotransmitter level, how a drug affects the nervous system, etc. I'm talking about a psychological addiction, an attempt to numb psychic pain.
Just like you don't need to be a Ph.D. to see someone is an alcoholic, you don't need a Ph.D. to see someone is addicted to marijuana.
again - sorry but you are not qualified nor medically-knowledgeable to make that statement. I can see someone is alcoholic but I am not qualified to determine the scientific explanation of addiction
Yes, They were very effective on this but yet, I find this ironic because over and over again, I see that marijuana itself has had a lot of positive feeds. Yet, the pharmaceutical companies are the one that is trying to prevent it to be legalized because money talks. If marijuana is legalized, the pharmaceutical companies will lose a lot of money as well.
Making something illegal won't stop people from using it. Murder is illegal but it still happens.