- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,903
- Reaction score
- 1,518
I'm not the one who called anyone "ignorants" so who would that be inflaming?Stop trying to lead and inflame, Reba. Liebling has already explained her post.
I'm not the one who called anyone "ignorants" so who would that be inflaming?Stop trying to lead and inflame, Reba. Liebling has already explained her post.
I'm not the one who called anyone "ignorants" so who would that be inflaming?
Is it your POV that some ADers are "ignorants"?
I'm not the one who called anyone "ignorants" so who would that be inflaming?
Me too.No matter either ADers or not, but I am allow to make my general post to express my POV without name anyone.
Me too.
Where?Difference is, you did name someone. :roll:
Where did I do that in this thread?And again with another thread going off topic because someone feels it is necessary to attack another member's posts based on nothing more than an accusation of "anti-American" that they can't seem to get beyond.
Same could be said for this buttinsky behavior.This immature and childish grudge satisfying behavior is getting very annoying.
Where?
Where did I do that in this thread?
Same could be said for this buttinsky behavior.
People constantly blamed Bush for everything, and they still do. Didn't you notice?
Should we wait until it's too late to stop him from making things worse?
Given the damage that Bush caused over the past 8 years, Obama couldn't do any worse. Besides, instead of constantly criticizing him for every move he makes, why don't we give him a fair chance? After all, he has a huge 8 year mess to clean up.
Especially not in 90 days!
Nope. You trying to pull mine?
Yes, he could do worse.Given the damage that Bush caused over the past 8 years, Obama couldn't do any worse. Besides, instead of constantly criticizing him for every move he makes, why don't we give him a fair chance? After all, he has a huge 8 year mess to clean up.
Why is it that you asked me ? Did I say " OMG! Do you know something we don't? " Ridiculous question. It's why I asked you if, you were tryin' to pull my leg.
I thought you should know who he is ( Obama's foreign policy advisor ).
I thought we were told to leave our day jobs off the boards. Your analysis of ADer motives is quite tiresome, especially when you are wrong.Your post was a direct reference to Liebling.
No one said you did that in this thread. But you have clearly established a pattern in numerous other threads, and are attempting to carry out that pattern here in this thread.
Of course you don't mean that in an inflammatory way. Just sweetness and light.What's the matter, Reba? Don't like it when the tables get turned?
No one forced you to go off topic.Now, how about getting back on topic?
I thought we were told to leave our day jobs off the boards. Your analysis of ADer motives is quite tiresome, especially when you are wrong.
Of course you don't mean that in an inflammatory way. Just sweetness and light.
No one forced you to go off topic.
OK, on topic--Obama's plan, will possible Orwellian overtones, hasn't improved any since we went off topic.
There, all caught up.
Yes, he could do worse.
I don't criticize every move he makes, only the ones that are bad for our country.
Hey, I got it--8 years big mess, damage that Bush caused, past 8 years--I got it already!
There's no need to get upset, Reba.![]()
Well, it's off-topic but he seems to be a good father to his daughters, and he's a skilled orator.Question: Have you ever said anything good about Obama since he took office? If so, I'd like to know what it was.
The amount of time involved doesn't necessarily equal the extent of damage possible.As for the potential of Obama doing worse, how could he when chances are likely that he'd only serve 4 years? 4 years of damage doesn't equate to 8.
I'm not upset.
Well, it's off-topic but he seems to be a good father to his daughters, and he's a skilled orator.
Can you say anything good about former President Bush?
The amount of time involved doesn't necessarily equal the extent of damage possible.
Here's a geological analogy:
Which is worse: slow, gradual erosion or a sudden, strong earthquake? It depends on several variables, doesn't it?