- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 7
How exactly is it a bad deal for the country long term? Lack of medical care is a bad deal for the country long term. You are going to have to be more specific.
Cost
How exactly is it a bad deal for the country long term? Lack of medical care is a bad deal for the country long term. You are going to have to be more specific.
Which "people?" All people? Do you include yourself?
Cost
Elaborate. How? In exactly what frame?
Too much....for a loooong time
Nobody seems to mind our bloated military budget which takes over half our money. Cut that in half and we will be fine.
Do you have a low opinion of American voters?If I had meant all people, I would have said all people. The people of whom I am speaking are the majority.
Does that include all voters?However, all people use heuristics in their thinking. But I am limiting this discussion to those which are used in making voting decisions.
I'm all for cutting out the waste, fraud, and abuse that goes on in the military. I'm not for depriving our military of things that they need.Nobody seems to mind our bloated military budget which takes over half our money. Cut that in half and we will be fine.
Do you have a low opinion of American voters?
Are the majority always wrong thinking?
Do you ever vote with the majority?
Were the majority wrong to vote for Obama?
Does that include all voters?
I'm all for cutting out the waste, fraud, and abuse that goes on in the military. I'm not for depriving our military of things that they need.
Better tracking of inventories, cutting out bureaucratic layers, more care in handing out contracts, hammering those who commit fraud with harsher penalties, for starters. Tighter enlistment requirements would cut down on time and money wasted on people who will never make it to the field.And how exactly do you think that should be accomplished? And what would be the end effects?
Better tracking of inventories, cutting out bureaucratic layers, more care in handing out contracts, hammering those who commit fraud with harsher penalties, for starters. Tighter enlistment requirements would cut down on time and money wasted on people who will never make it to the field.
The end effects would be less taxpayer money wasted and more efficiency.
Evidently, you are having difficulty giving a rationale for your train of thought, as well as difficulty understanding the question. "In what frame" isn't limited to time. It's okay. Don't want you to get all upset trying to explain a rationale that you have never before taken time to consider. I'll stop asking you to explain.
Are you asking me for exact form numbers and department titles? Why?Okay. Now, within our current system, how would you begin to institute these things?
Are you asking me for exact form numbers and department titles? Why?
Explained in many of the Health Care threads.......But that is moot now
Conservatives Won!
At least enough to stop the funding for this bill. Hopefully 2012 will bring it's demise
Wirelessly posted
Am I the only one who doesn't consider Republicans as conservatives, nor Democrats as liberals?