Actually, it's not biased toward creationism. Far from it. It's more of the metaphysical/philophical discussions on God and our consciousness.
But really, it's the only information that could explain how it's possible to have energy pop out of nowhere. It is such a difficult concept to grasp and it's hard to scour for explanations on vaccuum theory (the theory that energy can come out of nothingness).
Simply put, when there is "nothing", there is something out of nothing. The universe is ruled by this simple law - out of nothing, something is created. It HAD to have nothing in order to exist. I know... so difficult to grasp but it works.
This one is even better:
"Then why is there something rather than nothing? Because something is the more natural state of affairs and is thus more likely than nothing-more than twice as likely according to one calculation. We can infer this from the processes of nature where simple systems tend to be unstable and often spontaneously transform into more complex ones. Theoretical models such as the inflationary model of the early universe bear this out.
Consider the example of the snowflake. Our experience tells us that a snowflake is very ephemeral, melting quickly to drops of liquid water that exhibit far less structure. But that is only because we live in a relatively high temperature environment, where collisions with molecules in thermal motion reduce the fragile arrangement of crystals to a simpler liquid. Energy is required to destroy the structure of a snowflake.
But consider an environment where the ambient temperature is well below the melting point of ice, as it is in most of the universe far from the highly localized effects of stellar heating. In such an environment, any water vapor would readily crystallize into complex structures. Snowflakes would be eternal, or at least will remain intact until cosmic rays tear them apart.
What this example illustrates is that many simple systems are unstable, that is, have limited lifetimes as they undergo spontaneous phase transitions to more complex structures of lower energy. Since "nothing" is as simple as it gets, we would not expect it to be completely stable. In some models of the origin of the universe, the vacuum undergoes a spontaneous phase transition to something more complicated, like a universe containing matter. The transition nothing-to-something is a natural one, not requiring any external agent. [God]"
Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? (Reality Check, Skeptical Briefs July 2006)
And you know what? What are the odds of a snowflake being structured like that? One out of googool! That's something that creationists don't get it.. they argue about the odds of an organism existing and they cited the "odds" when in fact, they don't even KNOW how to calculate the odds (how can they if they don't what conditions are needed to create organism?!? Scientists never said that life began as a bacteria!)
!! Scientists are human, We cannot take science and use it to further our own agendas. Medicine is just one of the areas where people die by doing research, just like how science has solved much of the mysteries of the Universe, and how we got here is just one of them, scientists all agreed that the fossils say we came from nothing, I guess it means we came from nothing. 
