- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,903
- Reaction score
- 1,518
Before demolition the city should issue permits (for a fee) to professional salvagers to come remove reusable or recyclable materials. Then, they should use that money to pay for the asbestos and other hazardous material removal. They should also put to work the able-bodied unemployed in clean up duties. They would be paid for their labor; not high salaries but at least equal to unemployment amounts, sweetened with job skills training and enhanced resumes. American did similar projects in the past with the WPA.I think Detroit lost more than 1 million population in total? 1,849,568 - 713,777 = 1,135,791.
It looks like Detroit has 30,000+ abandoned buildings.
Way too many derelict buildings, nowhere near enough cash to raze them | Detroit Free Press | freep.com
The asbestos removal could cost $10,000+, depending on size, more size means cost more. EPA regulation require asbestos to be removed before it could demolished.
After the land is cleared and certified de-toxed, then they can be developed into urban green spaces and farm plots (as earlier suggested here). Residents would be responsible for the upkeep. College agi interns could provide the expertise for low salaries (this is where Federal dollars might come in), and corporations could provide the materials (with the requisite billboards and publicity).
I usually don't support Federal money programs but I wouldn't be adverse to a fund that would get all the street lights working again.
The one thing I wouldn't support is just handing over a pot of money to the Detroit "leaders." It would be just too hard to keep tabs on, and too many layers of bureaucracy would probably drain it all away.