Which is it? First you asked me the question, and I answered. You replied that you weren't talking to me, you were talking to Byrdie. Now you say you were talking to me.
I see where you got it mixed up, it was a post that Byrdie made during the of our conversation but wasn't part of ours. I never say I wasn't talking to you. If I am wrong, quote me of where I said I wasn't talking to you, so far, I haven't see it.
When you said, “Must you parrot someone else?” You weren't clear of who you were talking about. So the next comment I made it clear that I thought you were talking about Jiro because of his famous “epic fail” quote. You failed to correct me there. That's where the whole thing got confusing because I didn't know you were talking about Byrdie in the first place because I didn't read Byrdie's post. If I did, I would know what you were coming from, you dragging him in.
What are you talking about the "book" that made me say the two cannot accurately be compared? It is a matter of logic. But if you really want to investigate it, try any college level comp textbook. It will explain fallicious comparisons to you very well. And you might want to go back and re-read the posts, because I never mentioned having used a book. That was Byrdie. When you have cleared up your confusion, come back. And we will discuss the topic of the thread.
The topic of the thread was long history before I come around. No, you didnt mentioned having used a book. I came up with it. When I use the word "book," I wasn't thinking about Byrdie's comments. What I was getting at, "back up your allegation of why you make that statement." I may or maybe agree with you to a point, but you failed to answered my question after a few rounds.
BTW...how do you know Byrdie isn't my daddy? Maybe he is my sugar daddy, lol.
When someone said, "he/she isnt your daddy/mommy", it means fight your own battles.
This is making me laugh now. You argue like a liberal, nothing more and nothing less.
Back on the topic of the thread, USA needs to protect themselves from terrorist and there are number of people that think the CIA are wrong to use the pain method to get them to talk when at the same time, the terrorist aren't stopping at NOTHING. NOTHING. Are we to just bend over and let them win?
I need to run and will check later tonight.
It's because I understand the price and consequence of what it takes to let people like you to continue to flap your gum about war and laws. It's not just military. It's the public service that I'm interested in.
this is your famous word "it´s not my fault" *shake my head laughing*
