- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 45,072
- Reaction score
- 336
refer to post #2 (there is a reason)
then ask the person who posted #2.
I am not responsible for all Deaf people. We all have different ways of thinking too.
refer to post #2 (there is a reason)
initially when not everything was labelled in English, did you accuse him of hypocrisy and discrimination?
Wouldn't captioning work for all Deaf-deaf-hard of hearing people? Isn't written language something they all can understand?
Wouldn't captioning work for all Deaf-deaf-hard of hearing people? Isn't written language something they all can understand?
So, when a deaf person comes on here complaining about there being no ASL interpreter services, should HoH mock them?
Who is mocking the oral deaf people here?
I said HoH (get your terminology correct). HoH do not consider themselves to be deaf.
It should. I certainly didn't see Deaf people demanding imbedded ASL interpreters at movie theaters. They wanted captioning. So, it'd make more sense to have captioning at those Six Flags shows.
I said HoH (get your terminology correct). HoH do not consider themselves to be deaf.
I said HoH (get your terminology correct). HoH do not consider themselves to be deaf.
Yea, it would.
I really do not understand this line of questioning.
If oral deaf people feel left out at these events, then contact the amusement parks or the person responsible for arranging these events. I and I am sure many other Deaf people have no issues with captioning or CART systems.
I had no "line of questioning". I just threw myin.

That I agree..it wasnt something that I wasnt aware and I dont know if my friends were aware either. I cant speak for the whole Deaf population. Now it has been brought to my attention and if any oral deaf people want help in advocation in getting their needs met, I will be more than happy to help. Just dont insult us, Deaf people for something we arent really responsible for.
Steinhauer said:Who is mocking the oral deaf people here?
I said HoH (get your terminology correct). HoH do not consider themselves to be deaf.
Instead of getting offended why don't you post helpful information (after all, it is how the DEaf got advocates in the first place):
http://www.hohadvocates.org/
Fine, should we hope they get these opening captioning done at those Six Flags shows every day from day one when the parks opens to the last day combined with one day of "Deaf and Hard of Hearing Awareness" that come with ASL interpreters? Fair?
I said HoH (get your terminology correct). HoH do not consider themselves to be deaf.
Instead of getting offended why don't you post helpful information (after all, it is how the DEaf got advocates in the first place):
Hard of Hearing Advocates -- Solutions for Better Hearing
Not a bad idea if they did, then deaf people can talk to them.
But no, they don't have to learn sign languages, nor ASL deaf should do all the advocating for them when they have their own battle to worry about (like making sure they have an ASL interpreter there). I mean, I don't see Oral-only HOH/deaf advocating for ASL interpreter for the ASL deaf when they have their own problems to worry about.This doesn't mean neither support each other. It just mean that only people who know what works for themselves have to speak out what they need to get other people to listen (yes, even get support from deaf people who use ASL to join in their fight). Again this doesn't mean none of them support each other.
Shel never said she doesn't support Captioning.
Yes and no, Steinhauer. People with mild or moderate hearing loss do consider themselves to be hoh. It think it's the words "oral deaf" is misleading and even insulting because most of them go by aurally when it comes to speaking and listening, and not "oral."