- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 14,483
- Reaction score
- 11
Liebling's post #150.
And this proves what? I feel like I'm missing something. I keep rereading Liebling's post over and over. This letter appears to be a correction on an appropriation staffer being there when he wasn't. It's possible that this letter is supposed to imply that Pelosi wasn't wasn't there when CIA said she was there because they made a similar mistake about a staffer.
We have CIA's word vs Pelosi's word and no evidence for either the CIA or Pelosi.


over Clinton´s impeachment. Your good post make me laugh... It´s lame, I ever know in my life is the Republicans voted to impeach Clinton over that stupid blowjob in the oval office. His lie over blowjob in the oval office doesn´t kill anyone.