NY seeks to ban sugary drinks from food stamp buys

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,433
Reaction score
544
NEW YORK – New Yorkers on food stamps would not be allowed to spend them on sugar-sweetened drinks under an obesity-fighting proposal being floated by Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Gov. David Paterson.

Bloomberg and Paterson planned to announce Thursday that they are seeking permission from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the nation's food stamp program, to add sugary drinks to the list of prohibited goods for city residents receiving assistance.

If approved, it would be the first time an item would be banned from the federal program based solely on nutritional value.

The idea has been suggested previously, including in 2008 in Maine, where it drew criticism from advocates for the poor who argued it unfairly singled out low-income people and risked scaring off potential needy recipients.

And in 2004 the USDA rejected Minnesota's plan to ban junk food, including soda and candy, from food stamp purchases, saying it would violate the Food Stamp Act's definition of what is food and could create "confusion and embarrassment" at the register.

In New York, a proposal to adopt a penny-per-ounce tax on sweetened soda failed to get out of the state Legislature earlier this year; Bloomberg backed the state proposal.

Some New Yorkers who receive the assistance said Thursday that officials had good intentions, but felt the proposal goes too far.

"I can see the sodas, but suppose somebody's in bad shape and they just want juice," said Harold Vilson, a 56-year-old Brooklyn resident who said he uses food stamps.

"If people want to buy that stuff, they should be able to. If it's not an illegal product, they should be able to buy what they want to buy."

The food stamp system, which was launched in the 1960s, serves some 40 million Americans a month and does not currently restrict any other foods based on nutrition. Recipients can essentially buy any food for the household, although there are some limits on hot or prepared foods.

Food stamps also cannot be used to buy alcohol, cigarettes or items such as pet food, vitamins or household goods.

The city and state proposal would be temporary, so officials could study its effects over two years. It would apply only to food stamp recipients in New York City — 1.7 million of the city's more than 8 million residents — and would not affect the amount of assistance they receive.

"This initiative will give New York families more money to spend on foods and drinks that provide real nourishment," said a statement from Bloomberg, who also has outlawed trans-fats in restaurant food and has forced chain restaurants to post calorie counts on menus.

In fiscal year 2009, New Yorkers received $2.7 billion in food stamp benefits and spent $75 million to $135 million of that on sugary drinks, the city said.

The ban would apply to any beverage that contains more than 10 calories per 8 ounces, except for milk products, milk substitutes like soy milk and rice milk, and fruit juices without added sugar.

A 20-ounce sugar-sweetened drink can contain the equivalent of as many as 16 packets of sugar.

There still are many unhealthful products New Yorkers could purchase with food stamps, including potato chips, ice cream and candy. But officials said the proposal targets sugary drinks because they are the largest contributor to obesity.

"We continue to see a dramatic rise in obesity among children, especially in low-income communities," state Department of Health Commissioner Richard Daines said. "This initiative targets a major public health threat — the high consumption of sugary beverages — which have little to no nutritional value."

More than half of adult New York City residents are overweight or obese, along with nearly 40 percent of public school students in kindergarten through eighth grade.

City officials said lower-income residents are most likely to drink one or more sugar-sweetened drinks a day; type 2 diabetes is also twice as common among poor New Yorkers compared to the wealthiest.

USDA spokesman Aaron Lavallee said Thursday the agency received the proposal and will consider it.

The department recently launched a pilot program to encourage food stamp recipients to make more healthful choices in their food shopping. Under the program, involving 7,500 randomly selected households in Massachusetts, participants get 30 cents added to their benefit balances for every dollar they spend on fruits and vegetables — which reduces the cost of fresh produce by almost one-third.

NY seeks to ban sugary drinks from food stamp buys - Yahoo! News
 
If you want to live off the taxpayers' money, you should spend their money wisely.
 
Good! No junk food, please!

It's ridiculous to see the poor getting so fat.

Additionally, if we're paying the poor to eat, it better be something healthy. I don't want us paying for junk food. If they want junk food, let them work for it.
 
Good! No junk food, please!

It's ridiculous to see the poor getting so fat.

Additionally, if we're paying the poor to eat, it better be something healthy. I don't want us paying for junk food. If they want junk food, let them work for it.

Yeah, sugar plantations need workers. We need to limit their intake of sugar canes, though. Grrrr.
 
It won't stop them from buying diet soda...still junk.
 
It won't stop them from buying diet soda...still junk.

diet cokes should NOT count towards food stamps.

It must be whole foods. Processed dinners are fine as long as they're nutritious.

We're paying for their food therefore we should have the right to dictate what they can eat and cannot eat.

You pay food for your children so why do you think your children should eat whatever they want with your money?
 
Oatmeal. Bowlfuls of thick, gooey oatmeal. With no sugar, too bad. Can't go wrong with that as the National Menu.


Just who the HELL do we think we are????
 
Wirelessly posted

It's not really cheap or junk food that is the problem it's how government subsidized the oil companies, and the subsidizing is hidden within the food price. Do you really honestly believe tomatoes from Mexico is a dollar a pound, when you look at the oil prices for the average Joe? Comon.

No wonder why junk food is so cheap: they have hidden the true costs of the products.
 
Last edited:
Wirelessly posted

netrox said:
It won't stop them from buying diet soda...still junk.

diet cokes should NOT count towards food stamps.

It must be whole foods. Processed dinners are fine as long as they're nutritious.

We're paying for their food therefore we should have the right to dictate what they can eat and cannot eat.

You pay food for your children so why do you think your children should eat whatever they want with your money?

No. Solution is easy: stop subadizing the oil companies, the pesticide companies and the mass-production of corn. Then all the sudden, the processed food and chemical-laced food will be more expensive than buying organic.

Do you honestly believe all that chemicals, all that oil and everything would drive the food price down when you consider how much it costs to produce those without government grants and tax breaks?
 
Sugary soda isn't alone that caused obesity, all sugary and fatty foods do cause obesity, including fast food.

I feel that proposal to ban on sugary soda is just moot.

Also lack of exercises do cause obesity too.
 
Wirelessly posted



No. Solution is easy: stop subadizing the oil companies, the pesticide companies and the mass-production of corn. Then all the sudden, the processed food and chemical-laced food will be more expensive than buying organic.

Do you honestly believe all that chemicals, all that oil and everything would drive the food price down when you consider how much it costs to produce those without government grants and tax breaks?

Do you think that government should stop subsidizing on corn too?
 
I find it ironic that food stamp recipients can go to the cornor store, buy soda, candy, potato chips, cookies, etc. ......then go home and eat noodles for dinner.......people even sell their food stamps for $$$....WTF?....
 
I find it ironic that food stamp recipients can go to the cornor store, buy soda, candy, potato chips, cookies, etc. ......then go home and eat noodles for dinner.......people even sell their food stamps for $$$....WTF?....

In bold, that's true but it is illegal to sell the food stamps.
 
I think the there going to ban on using food stamps to buy sugary drinks , schools should not be allowed to have soda machines or sell it during lunch.
soda machines does not belong in public schools!
 
I think the there going to ban on using food stamps to buy sugary drinks , schools should not be allowed to have soda machines or sell it during lunch.
soda machines does not belong in public schools!

In Alabama, K-12 students are not allowed to have carbonated beverages, including sugary and diet soda during lunch, otherwise school district would lose the state funding if not followed.
 
I think the there going to ban on using food stamps to buy sugary drinks , schools should not be allowed to have soda machines or sell it during lunch.
soda machines does not belong in public schools!

That's already happening in Duval County public schools.....(started last year I believe).....
 
Back
Top