An Interesting Article

Status
Not open for further replies.

ASLGAL

New Member
Joined
May 5, 2007
Messages
761
Reaction score
0
An interesting look at a black woman's view:

Anne Wortham is Black, an Associate Professor of Sociology at Illinois State University and continuing Visiting Scholar at Stanford University 's Hoover Institution. She is a member of the American Sociological Association and the American Philosophical Association. She has been a John M. Olin Foundation Faculty Fellow, and honored as a Distinguished Alumni of the Year by the National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education.

In fall 1988 she was one of a select group of intellectuals who were featured in Bill Moyer's television series, "A World of Ideas." The transcript of her conversation with Moyers has been published in his book, A World of Ideas. Dr. Wortham is author of The Other Side of Racism: A Philosophical Study of Black Race Consciousness which analyzes how race consciousness is transformed into political strategies and policy issues.

She has published numerous articles on the implications of individual rights for civil rights policy, and is currently writing a book on theories of social and cultural marginality. Recently, she has published articles on the significance of multiculturalism and Afrocentricism in education, the politics of victimization and the social and political impact of political correctness. Shortly after an interview in 2004 she was awarded tenure.

This article by her is something else.
********************************************************************************************

No He Can't
by Anne Wortham

Fellow Americans,

Please know: I am black; I grew up in the segregated South. I did not vote for Barack Obama; I wrote in Ron Paul's name as my choice for president. Most importantly, I am not race conscious. I do not require a black president to know that I am a person of worth, and that life is worth living. I do not require a black president to love the ideal of America.

I cannot join you in your celebration. I feel no elation. There is no smile on my face. I am not jumping with joy. There are no tears of triumph in my eyes. For such emotions and behavior to come from me, I would have to deny all that I know about the requirements of human flourishing and survival – all that I know about the history of the United States of America, all that I know about American race relations, and all that I know about Barack Obama as a politician. I would have to deny the nature of the "change" that Obama asserts has come to America. Most importantly, I would have to abnegate my certain understanding that you have chosen to sprint down the road to serfdom that we have been on for over a century. I would have to pretend that individual liberty has no value for the success of a human life. I would have to evade your rejection of the slender reed of capitalism on which your success and mine depend. I would have to think it somehow rational that 94 percent of the 12 million blacks in this country voted for a man because he looks like them (that blacks are permitted to play the race card), and that they were joined by self-declared "progressive" whites who voted for him because he doesn't look like them. I would have to be wipe my mind clean of all that I know about the kind of people who have advised and taught Barack Obama and will fill posts in his administration – political intellectuals like my former colleagues at the Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.

I would have to believe that "fairness" is equivalent of justice. I would have to believe that man who asks me to "go forward in a new spirit of service, in a new service of sacrifice" is speaking in my interest. I would have to accept the premise of a man that economic prosperity comes from the "bottom up," and who arrogantly believes that he can will it into existence by the use of government force. I would have to admire a man who thinks the standard of living of the masses can be improved by destroying the most productive and the generators of wealth.

Finally, Americans, I would have to erase from my consciousness the scene of 125,000 screaming, crying, cheering people in Grant Park, Chicago irrationally chanting "Yes We Can!" Finally, I would have to wipe all memory of all the times I have heard politicians, pundits, journalists, editorialists, bloggers and intellectuals declare that capitalism is dead – and no one, including especially Alan Greenspan, objected to their assumption that the particular version of the anti-capitalistic mentality that they want to replace with their own version of anti-capitalism is anything remotely equivalent to capitalism.

So you have made history, Americans. You and your children have elected a black man to the office of the president of the United States, the wounded giant of the world. The battle between John Wayne and Jane Fonda is over – and that Fonda won. Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern must be very happy men. Jimmy Carter, too. And the Kennedys have at last gotten their Kennedy look-a-like. The self-righteous welfare statists in the suburbs can feel warm moments of satisfaction for having elected a black person. So, toast yourselves: 60s counter-cultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 90s bourgeois bohemians.

Toast yourselves, Black America. Shout your glee Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Duke, Stanford, and Berkeley. You have elected not an individual who is qualified to be president, but a black man who, like the pragmatist Franklin Roosevelt, promises to – Do Something! You now have someone who has picked up the baton of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. But you have also foolishly traded your freedom and mine – what little there is left – for the chance to feel good. There is nothing in me that can share your happy obliviousness.

Anne Wortham is an individualist liberal who happens to be black and American.
 
so? it's already proven that the 2008 election was not racially-motivated.
 
Apparently, the majority of African-Americans disagree with this individual. :cool2:

Aside from that, why do some African-Americans always want to make race the center of every issue?
 
So, some blacks did not vote for Obama, and some Cuascasion, Hispanic, Asian, and European decendents in America did. What exactly is the point?

Aticles like this that attempt to make a point about race are exactly what keeps race an issue. The fact is, a majority of Americans voted for Obama, and a minority did not. Period. No need to even mention race in the factor.
 
Obama has been in office for almost 2 months and already so many jokes, comments, and etc about race or about him as being the black president has been made. When is it gonna stop?
 
Interesting!

My hearing neighbor said she didn't vote for Obama. I asked her why? Her reply was: A lot of black people voted for Obama. I told her that a lot of caucasians voted for Obama, too. She said not a lot. Wow...
I think she's a racist. Jeez...
 
Obama has been in office for almost 2 months and already so many jokes, comments, and etc about race or about him as being the black president has been made. When is it gonna stop?

I'm afraid it never will. Even those who swear, "I'm not racist." can't see that their constant mention of race is, in and of itself, racist.:roll:
 
Interesting!

My hearing neighbor said she didn't vote for Obama. I asked her why? Her reply was: A lot of black people voted for Obama. I told her that a lot of caucasians voted for Obama, too. She said not a lot. Wow...
I think she's a racist. Jeez...

Tell her she might want to count the votes again.:roll:

And yep, she's a racist.
 
Some demographics of the last election:

(CNN) -- Strong support from young and minority voters propelled Barack Obama on the road to the White House, exit polls showed Tuesday.

Voters in the 18 to 24 age group broke 68 percent for Obama to 30 percent for John McCain, according to the exit polling. Those in the 25 to 29 age bracket went 69 percent to 29 percent in Obama's favor.

The only age group where McCain prevailed was 65 and over, and that by just a 10-percentage-point margin, 54 percent to 44 percent, the exit polls showed.

And minorities went heavily into the Obama camp. Blacks, 96 percent Obama to 3 percent McCain; Latinos, 67 percent Obama to 30 percent McCain; and Asians, 63 percent Obama to 34 percent McCain.

Obama did well with Latinos because they appear to disapprove of President Bush's job performance more than the rest of the country, CNN senior political analyst Bill Schneider said. Video Watch CNN's Bill Schneider explain the Latino impact »

About 80 percent of Latinos give Bush negative marks, while 72 percent of all Americans do, exit polling showed.

Race played less of a role in the election than age, exit polls showed.

While Obama is projected to be the nation's first black president, John McCain would have been the oldest person ever elected to the nation's highest office.

Twice as many of those polled Tuesday said age was an important factor in their vote as those who said race was.

Among those factoring age into their vote, 78 percent went for Obama to 21 percent for McCain, exit polls showed.

Those who said race was an important factor voted 55 percent to 44 percent in favor of Obama. But Obama also was the winner by a similar margin among those who said race was not important, "which suggests that race was not a decisive factor in this election," Schneider said.

The economy was the top issue in the election among 62 percent of voters questioned in exit polls on Tuesday.

It was far ahead of the second-place issue, the Iraq war, which was named as the top concern of 10 percent of voters polled.

Those who picked the Iraq war as their top issue mostly voted for Obama in all but two states, according to the early exit polling results.

Health care and terrorism were tied at 9 percent as the issue voters were most concerned about, according to the exit polling. Those who picked terrorism as their top concern overwhelmingly choose McCain, according to exit polling.

In early exit polling, first-time voters were breaking overwhelmingly for Obama over McCain by a 72 percent to 27 percent margin.

High income voters -- those who said they make at least $100,000 a year -- went in Obama's favor, 52 percent to 47 percent.

Many of those polled said they expect a post-election tax increase, with 49 percent predicting their taxes will rise no matter who is elected president. Another 22 percent said taxes will go up only if Obama wins, and 12 percent said taxes will go up only if McCain wins. Only 15 percent said their taxes will stay the same or go down.

A bare majority of those surveyed -- 51 percent -- think the government should do more to solve problems. Forty-three percent believe the government is doing too much. At the same time, early exit polling shows only a minority of voters -- 40 percent -- support the $700 billion government plan to assist failing financial companies. Fifty-six percent are opposed.

GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin didn't do well in exit polls. Sixty percent of those polled said the Alaska governor is not qualified to be president if necessary; 38 percent said she is. That compares with the two-thirds of those polled who said Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden is qualified to be president and the 31 percent who said he isn't.

Many voters told the pollsters that they made up their minds early in the campaign season, with 61 percent saying they made up their minds before September, another 13 percent saying they decided in September and 17 percent saying they made their selection last month.

Only 7 percent of those polled decided whom to support within the last three days.

Exit polling also showed that Democrats who supported Sen. Hillary Clinton during the primaries overwhelming voted for Obama in the general election, 84 percent to 15 percent for McCain.
Exit polls: Obama wins big among young, minority voters - CNN.com
 
Why is it necessary to point out that many black voters voted for Obama? That, in and of itself, is indicative of covert racial attitudes.

The fact is, he was elected by a landslide majority made up of many different demographics. The colors of the individual skins of the majority that elected him do not matter. The fact is, he was elected by a landslide majority of voters.

I bet several of the voters wore green shirts when they voted for Obama, and several probably had suits on. That is just as irrelevent as the color of their skin.
 
Why is it necessary to point out that many black voters voted for Obama? That, in and of itself, is indicative of covert racial attitudes.

The fact is, he was elected by a landslide majority made up of many different demographics. The colors of the individual skins of the majority that elected him do not matter. The fact is, he was elected by a landslide majority of voters.

I bet several of the voters wore green shirts when they voted for Obama, and several probably had suits on. That is just as irrelevent as the color of their skin.

:gpost:
 
Tell her she might want to count the votes again.:roll:

And yep, she's a racist.


I will but it's not worth it.
I thought so but she denied that she's a racist.. :roll:
Oh, well...
 
I will but it's not worth it.
I thought so but she denied that she's a racist.. :roll:
Oh, well...

Most racists deny being racist. And you are right...most are not willing to even look at the ways in which they are racist, so it's a complete waste of time to point it out to them unless they are willing to look at their own attitudes. But you are obviously very aware. Good for you.
 
What difference does it make? As jillio said, Obama won by a landslide. End of story. :)
Instead of speculating about who voted for whom, I thought people might be interested in the numbers.

What does it hurt to publish the statistics?
 
Instead of speculating about who voted for whom, I thought people might be interested in the numbers.

What does it hurt to publish the statistics?

Because the individual numbers, as related to skin color, have absolutely no effect on the final outcome. To concentrate on the skin color of the voter is to bring a racial issue into something that is not racial to begin with.
 
What difference does it make? As jillio said, Obama won by a landslide. End of story. :)

the reason for landslide is because of tremendous amount of money being spent on demographic research and strategy to capture the specific audience. ever wonder why many companies spent excessive amount on marketing?

again - what Reba said about statistic stuff in post #15 - it doesn't hurt to speculate on your own after reading the statistic. :)
 
Because the individual numbers, as related to skin color, have absolutely no effect on the final outcome. To concentrate on the skin color of the voter is to bring a racial issue into something that is not racial to begin with.

that's your opinion :)
 
Because the individual numbers, as related to skin color, have absolutely no effect on the final outcome. To concentrate on the skin color of the voter is to bring a racial issue into something that is not racial to begin with.
Did you read the whole thing?
 
Did you read the whole thing?

Yes, I did. And I paid particular attention to the areas that you bolded. I assume that those were the points you wanted to emphasize?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top