Zorror returns

Steel X

Steel X

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Messages
13,829
Reaction score
55
A sequel to the 1998 movie, "Zorror" is already in production.

Official Zorro Sequel Pic!
And a plot synopsis, too.

October 15, 2004 - USA Today has published the first official photo – seen to your right – from The Legend of Zorro, the sequel to the 1998 swashbuckler.


Antonio Banderas and Catherine Zeta-Jones have reprised their roles for the film; director Martin Campbell has returned as well. Production will continue through December in San Luis Potosi, Mexico.

The paper also has the following synopsis for the sequel: "Dashing Alejandro and sultry Elena are married and have a 10-year-old son, Joaquin (Adrian Alonso), who knows nothing of his dad's secret swashbuckling identity. Besides, the missus would be thrilled if Mr. Z kept his sword sheathed once and for all. But when greedy villains threaten to halt California's statehood, it's Zorro to the rescue again."
 
it costs $75 million to make this movie, but they only made $16 million,

FLOP!!!! :whistle:
 
Miss*Pinocchio said:
it costs $75 million to make this movie, but they only made $16 million,

FLOP!!!! :whistle:
Click to expand...
You can't expect movies to beat their budget during opening weekend. Give it some time.
 
I saw it , my dad got a bootleg version ...and i feel asleep... it was really stupid. the 1998 one was a lot better.
 
Um, you really shouldn't admit to having a bootleg copy. It's illegal in the US to possess an illegal copy or to distribute it. If I were you, I wouldn't admit to it on a public forum.

Yes, they can find you by tracking your assigned IP address.
 
ella said:
I saw it , my dad got a bootleg version ...and i feel asleep... it was really stupid. the 1998 one was a lot better.
Click to expand...
yeah I heard the sequel wasn't too good and many perfered the orginal 1998 film better. although the sequel was more of a "family film" rather than some action-packed thrill ride. bleh.
 
Banjo said:
Um, you really shouldn't admit to having a bootleg copy. It's illegal in the US to possess an illegal copy or to distribute it. If I were you, I wouldn't admit to it on a public forum.

Yes, they can find you by tracking your assigned IP address.
Click to expand...
It's not like they would know if her father made the bootleg version or that someone was selling it to her father, etc...who knows?

even my ex did buy alot of bootleg videos too...espeically with porn. :roll:

but I didnt buy any cause it seems that they doubled the price than it should be on a REAL DVD version...but ah well. *shrugs*
 
Steel said:
It's not like they would know if her father made the bootleg version or that someone was selling it to her father, etc...who knows?
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter if he made it or not, you can get into trouble for POSSESSING a bootleg copy. You shouldn't admit so freely to it if you don't want to be by MPAA. The thing is, the customers know exactly what they are buying... an illegal copy.

Oh yes, oh yes... you'll be surprised what they can find out. After all, the FBI does have a piracy dept.

even my ex did buy alot of bootleg videos too...espeically with porn. :roll:
Click to expand...

Your point being? It doesn't make a difference, it's still illegal. Try to get that through your thick skull. You're being stupid by ratting people and yourself out. To make matters worse, they can pin the criminal accomplice charge onto you because of your knowledge on people getting involved with these and doing nothing about it.

I'm just giving you the advice to keep your lips zipped in the public when it come to discussing bootlegs.

but I didnt buy any cause it seems that they doubled the price than it should be on a REAL DVD version...but ah well. *shrugs*
Click to expand...

Still, you could get pinned on as a criminal accomplice like I mentioned earlier.

Look here...

Fred Lawrence is being sued by the Motion Picture Association of America, after his grandkid downloaded four movies through an Internet file-sharing service.
Click to expand...

Lawrence says the boy didn't know what he was doing was illegal. The Wisconsin man says he himself didn't even know what file sharing was, until finding out he was being sued for as much as 600-thousand dollars.
Click to expand...

http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=AP&Date=20051104&ID=5254296

You don't want to get sued for $600,000. Isn't that right? All it takes for one person to get into trouble is to have one in their possession. It's not just the distributors who are getting sued and charged, it's also the downloaders.

Think twice before opening your mouth if you don't want to wear orange jumpsuits and eating gooey food. I'm just trying to give you the hint that it's not wise to freely admit to an illegal activity.

Supposedly somebody come on Alldeaf and publicly declare that he's a pedophile and download a lot of illegal pornographic materials, do you think he'll last long on the net?

I doubt it. The odds of admitting to possession of bootleg copies and getting in hot water may be relatively low but it can still happen. Especially when you can simply report a person to the FBI via their website without a hitch.

Who's to say that nobody here would do such a thing? Don't be so trusting of everybody here.
 
Back
Top