Witch Says Christine O'Donnell is Confused About Witchcraft

Status
Not open for further replies.
kokonut said:
It's common for a judgement to transfer judgement to another state if a person had moved to another state. Why bring up "and in two different states" and not make clear that it was one judgement? Saying that makes as if you were trying to imply that Christine had two cases on her hands. Not so.
Click to expand...

No, you implied it. I didn't. Nice try... :)
 
Banjo said:
Her personal background is pretty relevant and no, it wasn't taken out of context. A leopard cannot changes its spots. She can explain as much as she like to, it doesn't change the facts that these events did take place. So yes, it does matter since she is running for office.

It's interesting how some people were so quick to jump on President Obama over anything from the very beginning... yet not O'Donnell. Why is this?

Jobs? Security? Debt? Life? Values? Spending? Accountability?

All of the politicians have to take a stand somewhere on these issues even if they have to lie which they usually do anyway. They'll say anything to get a vote.

Don't put all of your eggs in one basket or it'll get ugly. Politicians are like diapers, you got to change them so often or they'll start to smell. Unfortunately, it's too late. There's piles of them and they just keep adding more and more.
Click to expand...

Oooh, yes, taken out of context..the witch comment when she was a teenager, the IRS faux pas....

Obama had a record of his own in govt which contradicted in what he said he would do. Remember his was a Senator before he became president. And he continues to contradict himself to this day.

People are clamoring for fresh new faces for a change over career politicians whether they're Democrats or Republicans.
 
kokonut said:
Oooh, yes, taken out of context..the witch comment when she was a teenager, the IRS faux pas....

Obama had a record of his own in govt which contradicted in what he said he would do. Remember his was a Senator before he became president. And he continues to contradict himself to this day.

People are clamoring for fresh new faces for a change over career politicians whether they're Democrats or Republicans.
Click to expand...

Are you implying that I said something about her being a witch? I know I didn't say anything in relation to that.

IRS faux pas? Um, I happened to mention that it was an error right after I had mentioned it.

Sorry, but I didn't take anything out of context. Just the facts please.
 
kokonut said:
Nice back-pedaling.
Click to expand...

Um... *chuckles*... okay...

Look Koko, I don't know what you're on... but I'm not back-pedaling. You're just trying to make it looks like one to save face.

If this was a Democrat we were talking about, you would be all over her. If she was a Democrat, I still would see her as a weak candidate. Like I said, your political agenda is an open book. It's pretty obvious.
 
Banjo said:
Are you implying that I said something about her being a witch? I know I didn't say anything in relation to that.

IRS faux pas? Um, I happened to mention that it was an error right after I had mentioned it.

Sorry, but I didn't take anything out of context. Just the facts please.
Click to expand...

You said...

"Her personal background is pretty relevant and no, it wasn't taken out of context."

I responded, yes, her comments and background were taken out of context. I didn't say you. I responded to your statement saying it wasn't taken out of context when it was. Calm down, dude.
 
Banjo said:
Um... *chuckles*... okay...

Look Koko, I don't know what you're on... but I'm not back-pedaling. You're just trying to make it looks like one to save face.

If this was a Democrat we were talking about, you would be all over her. If she was a Democrat, I still would see her as a weak candidate. Like I said, your political agenda is an open book. It's pretty obvious.
Click to expand...

Like who I'd be all over? Reaching much already?
 
kokonut said:
You said...

"Her personal background is pretty relevant and no, it wasn't taken out of context."

I responded, yes, her comments and background were taken out of context. I didn't say you. I responded to your statement saying it wasn't taken out of context when it was. Calm down, dude.
Click to expand...

Well, you implied that I said something regarding her witchcraft activities. Calm down? I am calm... it's you who need to calm down and toss out that political agenda of yours out the window. It's not doing you any good.

How were they taken out of context? These events did take place... so...
 
Yep...still reaching.

You see, you sure quickly jumped down about the NRCS on the whole "Tea party" thing which turned out to be false. Which made me go..."Hmmmm...."
 
Banjo said:
Well, you implied that I said something regarding her witchcraft activities. Calm down? I am calm... it's you who need to calm down and toss out that political agenda of yours out the window. It's not doing you any good.

How were they taken out of context? These events did take place... so...
Click to expand...

Umm...I wasn't the one who quickly went for the gun about the whole NRCS thing using the Tea Party context. You were mighty trigger happy there, son.
 
kokonut said:
Yep...still reaching.

You see, you sure quickly jumped down about the NRCS on the whole "Tea party" thing which turned out to be false. Which made me go..."Hmmmm...."
Click to expand...

Hmm... *shrugs*

It was an article stating what NRCS said prior to the primary election. I wasn't aware of their quick change in position at the time until you pointed it out. It doesn't change the fact they gave the impression that they didn't think too highly of her at first. Now they have no choice but to support her.

They should revert the voting rights exclusively to the landowners. It was a much better and country back then. Not to mention more solid too as well. Landowners were more financially stable and knew how the money should be used. Today, the average Joe don't have a clue how it works at all.

Christine O'Donnell isn't even a landowner based on what I have read.

I am a landowner though. Just saying. :)

They should be voting for candidates who are familiar with Economy 101. Not a lot of politicians are these days, at least I don't get that impression.

It's okay to want to see fresh faces in the government... as long they are competent and knowledgeable of the laws, economy, etc and truly represent their people, not the lobbyists putting the money in their pockets.
 
So, being a landowner is now pre-requisite in order to run for office?
:hmm:

It doesn't take a rocket scientist or CPA to know that deficit spending is bad just as maxing out on your credit cards is bad. Christine knows that. So did the voters who voted for her in the primary.

Christine's beliefs is representative of what many people believe in. Else why would they have voted for her in the primary instead of Castle?
 
Banjo said:
Hmm... *shrugs*

It was an article stating what NRCS said prior to the primary election. I wasn't aware of their quick change in position at the time until you pointed it out. It doesn't change the fact they gave the impression that they didn't think too highly of her at first. Now they have no choice but to support her.
Click to expand...

Ah, yes, but you certainly threw in that "Tea Party" context pretty darned quick, dude.
 
A buffoon!
 
Banjo said:
It's obvious that it did default. If it didn't, then why was a default judgment put in place?



*shrugs*
Click to expand...

OMG!!!! :laugh2: That is the funniest thing I have ever read!
 
kokonut said:
Christine's beliefs is representative of what many people believe in. Else why would they have voted for her in the primary instead of Castle?
Click to expand...

Christine got more votes from conservatives and members of Tea Party since more independents and democrats rather to vote Chris Coons over Mike Castle, that why Castle got less votes.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/22/cnntime-poll-coons-up-16-over-odonnell/

Christine has obviously no representative to me.

There is note for you, if you believe that Christine is a good candidate so that's fine with me. I'm respect your opinion and go support her whatever you want. Both you and I don't share same agreement in some cases.
 
My only fear is that Alvin Greene will be elected. :|
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top