Witch Says Christine O'Donnell is Confused About Witchcraft

Status
Not open for further replies.
it took judgement to make her pay back? yea... shining fiscal responsibility right there.
 
Jiro said:
it took judgement to make her pay back? yea... shining fiscal responsibility right there.
Click to expand...

especially when the IRS says they made a mistake ..... :roll:

But they didn't in Nancy Killefer's case ....

They overlook their own czars "mistakes" and smear their opponents "non-issues"
 
Steinhauer said:
especially when the IRS says they made a mistake ..... :roll:

But they didn't in Nancy Killefer's case ....

They overlook their own czars "mistakes" and smear their opponents "non-issues"
Click to expand...

IRS? eh? since when IRS handles tuition?
 
Jiro said:
IRS? eh? since when IRS handles tuition?
Click to expand...

one of the accusations against O'Donnell (one you are conveniently not mentioning) is that a lien was put on her home by the IRS.

The IRS admitted it was an error.


She paid her debts ..... she survived the housing crisis that is affecting everyone.

Still making issues out of non issues - yeah, it smells like fear.
 
Steinhauer said:
one of the accusations against O'Donnell (one you are conveniently not mentioning) is that a lien was put on her home by the IRS.

The IRS admitted it was an error.


She paid her debts ..... she survived the housing crisis that is affecting everyone.

Still making issues out of non issues - yeah, it smells like fear.
Click to expand...

but....

Christine O'Donnell gives GOP establishment a thumpin' | Washington Examiner
The Republicans in Bridgeville who supported Castle mentioned O'Donnell's well-publicized financial problems: her unpaid taxes, unpaid college tuition, and unpaid house payments. "She needs to learn how to balance her own checkbook before she takes on ours," said Judi Moore, who added that O'Donnell is "just a little too far right for me."
Click to expand...
 
ever hear of RINO's? Lots of politicians switching parties ....
 
image6883600g.jpg


"Witchcraft? lol!"
 
I found that is laughable when someone is try to defend Christine O'Donnell and she's crook.

In GOP, you don't have to be conservative on all issues and some people in GOP consider to be moderate on some issues, especially GLBT rights. Label them as RINO is just silly in my taste and moderate GOP may make sense in some politicians.

If someone wants rid of GOP politician whoever is conservative in fiscal but receive 100% from HRC for most gay friendly and label them as RINO. Look in 60's and 70's, gay rights in GOP doesn't matters.
 
kokonut said:
Not quite "in two different state." The judgement was won in university in New Jersey. Then judgment was transferred to California, where O'Donnell lived at the time. It'd be erroneous of you to say it happened in two different states. It was one judgement only. California reported the debt as satisfied later on.
Click to expand...

It's truly sad when you have to start nitpicking just to prove a point... which isn't even relevant to start with. Besides, you got it wrong. I said the legal case went on for years and in two different states. When did I say there were two judgments made? It was pretty obvious I was referring to the same judgment made in New Jersey. It was transferred from that particular state to California... therefore... two states! Nothing erroneous about it.

Still beating around the bush. Hee.

Your political agenda is like reading an open book. It's too obvious.

I don't even know this woman and I already know she's a weak candidate based on her personal background.
 
Good grief, we are STILL discussing her? She is just a flash in the pan and will drift into obscurity soon. Remember Super Tuesday a few weeks ago? Even Republicans are emitting smells of fear, if the voting results are any indication. Just wait and see. There is more common sense than people are given credit for. Yawwnnn...
 
Banjo said:
It's truly sad when you have to start nitpicking just to prove a point... which isn't even relevant to start with. Besides, you got it wrong. I said the legal case went on for years and in two different states. When did I say there were two judgments made? It was pretty obvious I was referring to the same judgment made in New Jersey. It was transferred from that particular state to California... therefore... two states! Nothing erroneous about it.

Still beating around the bush. Hee.

Your political agenda is like reading an open book. It's too obvious.

I don't even know this woman and I already know she's a weak candidate based on her personal background.
Click to expand...

It's common for a judgement to transfer judgement to another state if a person had moved to another state. Why bring up "and in two different states" and not make clear that it was one judgement? Saying that makes as if you were trying to imply that Christine had two cases on her hands. Not so.

Weak candidacy based on her personal background? Rather the people see her on what she supports. Her personal background was taken out of context and distorted. And why? :hmm:
 
Rather I support what O'Donnell because of where she stands on jobs, security, debt, taxes, on life, energy, values, spending, accountability, healthcare and gun control issues. I believe people are tired of seeing career politicians in Congress and want to see fresh new faces instead.
 
kokonut said:
Rather I support what O'Donnell because of where she stands on jobs, security, debt, taxes, on life, energy, values, spending, accountability, healthcare and gun control issues. I believe people are tired of seeing career politicians in Congress and want to see fresh new faces instead.
Click to expand...

Good Lord. Support the village idiot just for a fresh face. Yeah, righhhht. :lol:
 
Banjo said:
It's truly sad when you have to start nitpicking just to prove a point... which isn't even relevant to start with. Besides, you got it wrong. I said the legal case went on for years and in two different states. When did I say there were two judgments made? It was pretty obvious I was referring to the same judgment made in New Jersey. It was transferred from that particular state to California... therefore... two states! Nothing erroneous about it.

Still beating around the bush. Hee.

Your political agenda is like reading an open book. It's too obvious.

I don't even know this woman and I already know she's a weak candidate based on her personal background.
Click to expand...

Yup, I agree with you and I do have similar feel about her as well.
 
Her personal background is pretty relevant and no, it wasn't taken out of context. A leopard cannot changes its spots. She can explain as much as she like to, it doesn't change the facts that these events did take place. So yes, it does matter since she is running for office.

It's interesting how some people were so quick to jump on President Obama over anything from the very beginning... yet not O'Donnell. Why is this?

Jobs? Security? Debt? Life? Values? Spending? Accountability?

All of the politicians have to take a stand somewhere on these issues even if they have to lie which they usually do anyway. They'll say anything to get a vote.

Don't put all of your eggs in one basket or it'll get ugly. Politicians are like diapers, you got to change them so often or they'll start to smell. Unfortunately, it's too late. There's piles of them and they just keep adding more and more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top