Witch Says Christine O'Donnell is Confused About Witchcraft

Status
Not open for further replies.
I remember some threads at outside of the AD, people tend confuse with Wicca and Pagan. Because they're not same or similar religions.
 
Wirelessly posted

shel90 said:
If someone doesnt agree with a poltican, why accuse the person of fear? strange
Click to expand...

Because it's Sarah Palin all over again-- and some remember the: "sniff sniff I smell fear" tagline.
 
TXgolfer said:
Do you have a link for these "facts"


She explained the "house defaulted" rumor last night. It did not default.....she did get behind a payment while doing a pro bono case (you would think Dems would like that) and sold the house.....the payment was covered at closing.

As for the IRS.....they are morons....it happens all the time. A notice of intent to file lien was mailed. That is a common occurrence during an audit. I have received one myself. Most people in business for themselves have.

I find it funny that people are searching for dirt on a candidate that is polling 15 points behind. I believe I smell a hint of fear.
Click to expand...

Yes, in fact she has a letter from the IRS stating that they made an error about the erroneous $11,000 she supposedly owed in back taxes . Not exactly an "allegation" there.
 
TXgolfer said:
Do you have a link for these "facts"
I find it funny that people are searching for dirt on a candidate that is polling 15 points behind. I believe I smell a hint of fear.
Click to expand...

Yet, they don't even address her issues that she is in support of. Kind of hard to argue against her for proposing lower taxes and all that.

Fear?

Yep. The cannot even confront her on the issues alone.
 
She cast a spell on them. Made them "forget" about her late payments.

Its all good! Nothing to see here .... move along ....
 
souggy said:
Wirelessly posted

Because it's Sarah Palin all over again-- and some remember the: "sniff sniff I smell fear" tagline.
Click to expand...

It is fear if they cannot even debate on the merits of where a candidate stands on a variety of issues. Instead they focused on what she said when she was a teenagers. :roll:
 
She didn't pay her tuition fees which resulted in her degree being held hostage. The university sued her in order to get the tuition fees paid. It was finally paid off in 2003. Her mortgage defaulted. She sold it before it could be auctioned off. She was cited 8 times between 2007 and 2009 for not reporting her contributions on time.

They are all of financial matters.

Coincidence? I think not. She is simply not good with money as far I am concerned. She's only trying to get voted in so she can pay her bills and buy that house of hers back.

It doesn't matter what stands on a variety of issues because her character is questionable to start with. Especially where the money is concerned. Otherwise, they wouldn't be bringing this up.

The fact is, her financial matters is something that shouldn't be ignored.
 
Not even the NRSC plan to fund her campaign...

NRSC: No Plans to Fund O’Donnell - Washington Wire - WSJ

Look like the GOP is dumping the Tea Party like hot potatoes these days. It seems like yesterday they were going gung-ho for the Tea Party, taking advantage of them. Now they are ignoring them.

Hmm... what else is new?
 
Banjo said:
Not even the NRSC plan to fund her campaign...

NRSC: No Plans to Fund O’Donnell - Washington Wire - WSJ

Look like the GOP is dumping the Tea Party like hot potatoes these days. It seems like yesterday they were going gung-ho for the Tea Party, taking advantage of them. Now they are ignoring them.

Hmm... what else is new?
Click to expand...

Hmm, you ARE behind the news. Christine won the primary on September 14, 2010, the same day the WSJ article came out about NRSC. But on September 15, 2010 NRSC said this:

Let there be no mistake: The National Republican Senatorial Committee – and I personally as the committee’s chairman – strongly stand by all of our Republican nominees, including Christine O’Donnell in Delaware.

I reached out to Christine this morning, and as I have conveyed to all of our nominees, I offered her my personal congratulations and let her know that she has our support. This support includes a check for $42,000 – the maximum allowable donation that we have provided to all of our nominees – which the NRSC will send to her campaign today.

We remain committed to holding Democrat nominee New Castle County Executive Chris Coons accountable this November, as we inform voters about his record of driving his county to the brink of bankruptcy and supporting his party’s reckless spending policies in Washington.
Click to expand...


Cornyn embraces O'Donnell - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

Keep up, please.
 
Banjo said:
She didn't pay her tuition fees which resulted in her degree being held hostage. The university sued her in order to get the tuition fees paid. It was finally paid off in 2003. Her mortgage defaulted. She sold it before it could be auctioned off. She was cited 8 times between 2007 and 2009 for not reporting her contributions on time.

They are all of financial matters.

Coincidence? I think not. She is simply not good with money as far I am concerned. She's only trying to get voted in so she can pay her bills and buy that house of hers back.

It doesn't matter what stands on a variety of issues because her character is questionable to start with. Especially where the money is concerned. Otherwise, they wouldn't be bringing this up.

The fact is, her financial matters is something that shouldn't be ignored.
Click to expand...

Many students who graduated take a long time to pay back their tuition. In Christine's case it took her over 10 years to slowly pay off her tuition bill. Not out of the ordinary that these things happen.

Her home was privately sold in 2008 through a realtor and private mortgage company, not a public foreclosure.
 
kokonut said:
Many students who graduated take a long time to pay back their tuition. In Christine's case it took her over 10 years to slowly pay off her tuition bill. Not out of the ordinary that these things happen.
Click to expand...

She claimed to be a graduate of the university for years. She participated in the graduation ceremony. However, she did not acquire her bachelor's degree until this summer. The university sued her in order to get the money she owed them. The university won, but still didn't get their money until much later. They had to transfer the judgment from New Jersey to California in order to get her to pay. This is why she couldn't get her bachelor's degree because she wouldn't pay for it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/us/politics/16odonnell.html

The difference is, the students often paid for their tuitions over the years... however... Christine O'Donnell didn't. The university had to sue her and it went on for years and in two different states.

Her home was privately sold in 2008 through a realtor and private mortgage company, not a public foreclosure.
Click to expand...
A default judgment was put in place. She had no choice but to sell it or have it auctioned off. She just got lucky this time. She sold it to Brent Vasher, a legal counsel who worked on her campaign. Newflash, Brent was also her boyfriend at the time.

All of these are of financial matters. It's nothing to scoff at. She is spending what she doesn't have. Just like the President of America is.
 
kokonut said:
Hmm, you ARE behind the news. Christine won the primary on September 14, 2010, the same day the WSJ article came out about NRSC. But on September 15, 2010 NRSC said this:
Click to expand...

The fact is, they considered they an unelectable candidate prior to the primary. Now they are acting as if it never happened in the first place.

Now, they have to play friends with her since she won the primary. They don't really have a choice unless they want a Democrat to hold onto his seat.
 
kokonut said:
Many students who graduated take a long time to pay back their tuition. In Christine's case it took her over 10 years to slowly pay off her tuition bill. Not out of the ordinary that these things happen.

Her home was privately sold in 2008 through a realtor and private mortgage company, not a public foreclosure.
Click to expand...

but.... she never paid back the tuition... unless I'm wrong.
 
mirror mirror on the wall, who paid tuition this coming fall?
 
Banjo said:
The fact is, they considered they an unelectable candidate prior to the primary. Now they are acting as if it never happened in the first place.

Now, they have to play friends with her since she won the primary. They don't really have a choice unless they want a Democrat to hold onto his seat.
Click to expand...

Simply put. The NRSC put their money where their mouth is. And they support her.
 
Banjo said:
She claimed to be a graduate of the university for years. She participated in the graduation ceremony. However, she did not acquire her bachelor's degree until this summer. The university sued her in order to get the money she owed them. The university won, but still didn't get their money until much later. They had to transfer the judgment from New Jersey to California in order to get her to pay. This is why she couldn't get her bachelor's degree because she wouldn't pay for it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/us/politics/16odonnell.html

The difference is, the students often paid for their tuitions over the years... however... Christine O'Donnell didn't. The university had to sue her and it went on for years and in two different states.

A default judgment was put in place. She had no choice but to sell it or have it auctioned off. She just got lucky this time. She sold it to Brent Vasher, a legal counsel who worked on her campaign. Newflash, Brent was also her boyfriend at the time.

All of these are of financial matters. It's nothing to scoff at. She is spending what she doesn't have. Just like the President of America is.
Click to expand...

Not quite "in two different state." The judgement was won in university in New Jersey. Then judgment was transferred to California, where O'Donnell lived at the time. It'd be erroneous of you to say it happened in two different states. It was one judgement only. California reported the debt as satisfied later on.
 
oh .... so she went into debt, and paid her debts?

Wow! that is a shining example that the czars could have learned from ....
 
See? Instead of issues she supports that they can debate over with they choose to try and smear her. Why are they so afraid to debate on the merits of issues she supports?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top