What kind of Jewish are you?

What kind of Jewish are you?

  • Messianic

    Votes: 4 100.0%
  • Orthreox

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Reform

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Conversim (sp?)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4
Status
Not open for further replies.
heath......why do u have to talk bad things abt jewish....it isnt right to put the finger at jewish ppl and show them the disrespect....just respect and simple move on! geez! we did respect ur ways and now u insult jewish ppl even if they didnt insult u or anything??
 
Teresh said:
A GLBT debate does not belong in this thread. The issue is that you are unpatriotic because you think that patriotism, that is, being involved in the nation and its politics, is unpatriotic.

Hey Teresh you brought up the GLBT issue and not me. My hands are clean on that one and I spoke my mind and I am gonna hold my peace now.
 
Heath said:
What happened to " One Nation Under God " ? Have you forgotten God also ?

What about the Bill of Rights? Have you forgotten about that too?
 
Heath said:
Take a good look at the jews, they mocked and made fun of Jesus Christ even though Jesus Christ was telling the truth and not watering it down for the jews. ..
Many Gentiles do the same thing every day.

It was our sins that put Jesus on the cross. We are all equally guilty.
 
Reba said:
Many Gentiles do the same thing every day.

It was our sins that put Jesus on the cross. We are all equally guilty.


i agree with u, gurl! :cheers: everyone are equally guilty and no one are perfect...
 
Heath said:
You are trying to be vague and I have been on point every time and spoke very bluntly which you intensely disliked because I spoke the truth.

I'm only being blunt because bluntness is all you understand. You don't have the intellectual finesse to understand anything else.

Heath said:
Homosexuality has no place in any nation that is a patriotic country nor Does homosexuality have any place any where on the planet for that matter.

Considering, we live in a nation where liberty and personal freedom is the fundamental founding principle, you are incorrect. And you are unpatriotic for suggesting that liberty is bad.

Heath said:
What happened to " One Nation Under God " ? Have you forgotten God also ?

"One nation under God" is not part of the original Pledge of Allegiance.

Heath said:
Hey Teresh you brought up the GLBT issue and not me. My hands are clean on that one and I spoke my mind and I am gonna hold my peace now.

The GLBT statement was a metaphor used to see if you would contradict yourself, which indeed you did.
 
Teresh said:
I'm only being blunt because bluntness is all you understand. You don't have the intellectual finesse to understand anything else.



Considering, we live in a nation where liberty and personal freedom is the fundamental founding principle, you are incorrect. And you are unpatriotic for suggesting that liberty is bad.



"One nation under God" is not part of the original Pledge of Allegiance.



The GLBT statement was a metaphor used to see if you would contradict yourself, which indeed you did.

Teresh , Can you contradict God's Kingdom of Heaven, Especially in Revelations ? I didn't think so. Let's close this debate on a good note.
 
Heath said:
Teresh , Can you contradict God's Kingdom of Heaven, Especially in Revelations ? I didn't think so. Let's close this debate on a good note.

I can very easily contradict it. All I have to say is that I don't believe that book is correct. So, I will.

I don't believe the Book of Revelations is valid.

How's that? Contradicted, fully and completely. Nothing is true if the reader does not believe it to be true. I believe the New Testament to be fiction. Thus, to me, it is not true. It may be true to you, but you're not me. That said, the fact that you think that your way, your beliefs, are absolutely correct and that other people who have different ideas, different beliefs should not be respected or treated fairly, indicates that you have no experience in life and therefore you lost this debate before it even began.

Go get educated. Until then, you will always be outclassed in debate by people who know more about the subject than you do. When you stand on equal footing in knowledge, then, and only then, can you debate. Otherwise, you will always lose. People will always look down on you, perceive you to be a fool.

You are not dealing with the sort of person that will allow you to get away with arguing without a sound understanding of the subject. You may have that in other threads, on other forums, or in other places, but not here, and not with me.
 
Heath said:
How do you explain the modern day behavior of the Israelites, they are not that so different from 2,000 years ago and F.Y.I. Did you know that if you were to ask a jew to accept Jesus Christ into their heart then you can be arrested for helping a jew to come to know Jesus Christ as their personal savior.
Are you talking about Israelis in Israel? Citizens of the modern nation of Israel are Israelis. Israelites are the members of the 12 twelve tribes of Israel, regardless of where they live on earth. Those are two different terms. Not all Israelites or Jews are Israelis.

Privately, a Christian can witness to a Jew in Israel; they just can't do it publicly. I personally know some that do that.
 
Reba said:
I'm really surprised that you don't catch the anti-Semitic buzzwords in Heath's posts. If you are a journalist, you need to develope a sense for not just the dictionary meanings of words but the hidden meanings and feelings they convey. A journalist should be a wordsmith.

Red flags:
"Jewish agenda", "race-mixing", "Jew Watch" (why do Jews need "watching?), "jewdar", "judazied society"



Technically speaking, the Romans crucified Jesus.

But Christians are not supposed to hold that against the Jews today. Even Paul said, "Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved." (Romans 10:1)


Reba,

Heath didn't say, "What I'm about to say is anti-Semitic, so don't look." What he said is protected under the First Amendment. What he said was a matter of opinion and it is for that reason why he shouldn't be censored.

To compare for a moment, Reba, right now, I'm sitting on a chair with the back part raised and my right leg crossed over my left. Would you say that I am poking fun at women because a lot of them sit with their leg crossed? No, of course not. It's all open for interpretation.
 
Last edited:
pek1 said:
What he said is protected under the First Amendment. What he said was a matter of opinion and it is for that reason why he shouldn't be censored.

We have the right to say that he is full of shit as well. :)
 
pek1 said:
What he said is protected under the First Amendment. What he said was a matter of opinion and it is for that reason why he shouldn't be censored.

Actually, AllDeaf is a private entity and the Constitution does not really apply here.

Nonetheless, if this were a public entity, yes, what he's saying would be protected. I don't have a problem with that, I doubt Reba does either. The fact that he can say it, however, does not make it less Anti-Semitic. Homophobia is still homophobia, whether it's legal or not. That also goes for Anti-Semitism, Sexism, Racism, etc.
 
Reba said:
Hey, I watch Fox News. Don't blame them for anti-Semitism.

:popcorn:
Oh, no . . . we wouldn't want to do that, now would we, poor Reba? They're so far right-wing that they are the ones that invented the tip-up wings on the airplanes. ;) :D

Oh, no, you'd rather knock me (pek1) for wanting to marry an African woman and getting her over here so she can have opportunity in life . . . gee whiz, between you and Heath . . . <<heads banging together>>

:laugh2: :bump: :popcorn: LOLAFOTFL!!!!!!!!
 
hootster said:
We have the right to say that he is full of shit as well. :)

Nice legs, hooster . . . how soon are you going to be in shape for the marathon? Let's concentrate on that instead of telling someone they're full of something that you are actually more full of, shall we? ;)
 
pek1 said:
Nice legs, hooster . . . how soon are you going to be in shape for the marathon? Let's concentrate on that instead of telling someone they're full of something that you are actually more full of, shall we? ;)

Ok, I wasnt talking about you. I was talking about Heath.
 
pek1 said:
Heath didn't say, "What I'm about to say is anti-Semitic, so don't look." What he said is protected under the First Amendment. What he said was a matter of opinion and it is for that reason why he shouldn't be censored.
I never said that he should be censored.

Also, those of us who are against anti-Semitism have the right to dispute Heath's attacks on Jews.


To compare for a moment, Reba, right now, I'm sitting on a chair with the back part raised and my right leg crossed over my left. Would you say that I am poking fun at women because a lot of them sit with their leg crossed? No, of course not. It's all open for interpretation.
Your analogy is nonsensical.
 
pek1 said:
...Oh, no, you'd rather knock me (pek1) for wanting to marry an African woman and getting her over here so she can have opportunity in life . . .
When did I do that? :confused:
 
SHUT UP HEATH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :mad:




iraqi_shut_up_bitch.jpg
 
Teresh,

I'm curious are you a lawyer? Do you make any plans on going to law school?
 
Cane Corso said:
Teresh,

I'm curious are you a lawyer? Do you make any plans on going to law school?

Yeah, good question. Teresh totally murdered him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top