Well, you're not being fair. You also did not explain clearly what you meant by "truth" in your opening post, so Askjo was within his rights to post his views on what truth was, and why the deaf do not subscribe to its importance.
Quite odd that your first response in this thread was to complain about Askjo, instead of expanding on your opening post or answer the others who posted immediately thereupon.
Well, now that you have explained yourself, i don't think you have thought this out carefully. For one thing, "gossip" and "rumor" can be true if something scandalous happened and some person, unable to keep such information to him/herself, shares it with another, and they find others to shock the information with, and perpetuate the cycle. What is true and what is gossip is not necessarily mutually exclusive. However, if you were talking about misleading information such as calumnies, then you might have something to work with. Do you have examples?
For another, this is hardly news - people have always been circulating rumor and gossip since the dawn of civilization, so no big deal. That means it's not a recent phenomenon. Perhaps communicating on the internet has made the already "small" deaf world even smaller, which means the information is circulated much faster.