- Joined
- Mar 17, 2008
- Messages
- 43,645
- Reaction score
- 504
Ah.. Like sending them to Siberia.
![Hmm :hmm: :hmm:](/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/hmm.gif)
It is surrounded by elderly housing. The hospital is down the street. It's mostly a residential area with some professional buildings (doctors, dentists, lawyers) near.
Mentally ill violent patients who have been convicted of felonies and are on the sexual predator lists.
Not next door to a nursing home and retirement housing. I mean right next door. There is no green space separating them.
They only recently added the lattice on top of the six-foot privacy fence. There is no security fencing except for the drive-thru gate, which is electronic.
If the youth is that troubled, he should have been in a prison for criminals with mental illness, in an attached juvenile ward.
Agreed. He should have also been incarcerated in his own area instead being sent to our state. Apparently it's a big business now, to take patients and prisoners from other states for a fee.
Yes, he should have been. I don't know if you read the original article that Reba linked to. There are a lot of comments saying exactly that, with the people of SC being pretty irate that Washington, D.C. (where this guy is from) is shipping these offenders to other places, which make a profit on having a high "bed count."
D.C. closed down a treatment/detention center for offenders in this category a while ago - I think maybe a year or two ago. So these guys are getting shipped all over the place, mostly to states in the south, which for some is probably a good idea because it gets them away from the environment that led to their problems in the first place.
However, it looks like this particular low-security facility was not the best place to send someone who is already charged with attempted murder, is older than the population for whom the facility was designed, and has more serious problems all-around than what they are set up to handle.
(Reba slipped, with the same point.)
None yet, that I know of. Then again, not everything makes the papers. This incident was kept under wraps.Still close to a hospital. That is wise for a unit like this.
How many instances of a patient at this facility have there been of an elderly person living in the vacinity being injured or accosted by one of these patients?
None yet, that I know of. Then again, not everything makes the papers. This incident was kept under wraps.
Most of them are sex offenders, and they've been convicted of violent felonies.They are still ill. And, to be honest, you don't know if the violence is controlled when the mental illness is controlled. In the vast majority of cases, it is.
Why is that facility smack in the middle of a residential area?Better to have them in a treatment facility to reduce the chances of recidivism than to put them in prison and let them fester for several years and then turn them back on the street sicker than they were when they were first incarcerated.
You don't know that for a fact about that particular place, and they're not talking.If these patients are a security risk or a risk to the neighboring communities, they will be on a locked ward and not permitted grounds privileges.
Most of them are sex offenders, and they've been convicted of violent felonies.
They are also mentally ill offenders. Sex offenders are actually the most ameniable to in depth treatment. Especially as juveniles. Juvenile offenders have also been victimized at some point. Most adult offenders as well. The way to stop the cycle is through treatment. That is not to say that punsihment is not in order as well. But that time is best used recovering from the disorders so they don't reoffend.
I've know for a while about the sex offender youth there. I didn't realize that older, convicted criminals were also there.
This particular program serves children through geriatric patients. I think that the one that you are referring to is the adolescent unit for the program, and children, adults, and geriatric patients are served at separate facilities. But 19 is still an adolescent developmentally. It is not irresponsible to have him in an adolescent unit.
Why is that facility smack in the middle of a residential area?
It sounds as if the area is mixed business and residential. In fact, it sounds like a very health care oriented area. Assisted living facilities are also health care, and are zoned as such. And I don't know which was there first...the assisted living could have chosen to locate next to this facilty.
You don't know that for a fact about that particular place, and they're not talking.
I don't remember. That entire street, except for the hospital, was developed pretty much all at the same time. All the buildings on that side of the street were built within months of each other. The hospital was originally a clinic at that time, then was added on to and became a hospital a few years later. It's changed hands a few times.Which facility was there first? The mental health facility or the nursing home?
According to their website, their facility is for youth aged 12-17 years. The escapee was a legal adult, convicted of attempted murder.This particular program serves children through geriatric patients. I think that the one that you are referring to is the adolescent unit for the program, and children, adults, and geriatric patients are served at separate facilities. But 19 is still an adolescent developmentally. It is not irresponsible to have him in an adolescent unit.
I don't remember. That entire street, except for the hospital, was developed pretty much all at the same time. All the buildings on that side of the street were built within months of each other. The hospital was originally a clinic at that time, then was added on to and became a hospital a few years later. It's changed hands a few times.
Development happens very quickly here. New subdivisions and schools pop up almost overnight.
According to their website, their facility is for youth aged 12-17 years. The escapee was a legal adult, convicted of attempted murder.
I don't remember. That entire street, except for the hospital, was developed pretty much all at the same time. All the buildings on that side of the street were built within months of each other. The hospital was originally a clinic at that time, then was added on to and became a hospital a few years later. It's changed hands a few times.
Development happens very quickly here. New subdivisions and schools pop up almost overnight.
Just because I'm concerned about escapees that don't get reported doesn't mean I'm not concerned about offenders who haven't yet been caught. I'm concerned about both.As in most areas. Growth seems to explode in some areas, and it is difficult to know which facility was there first.
Like I said, I understand your concern. But, truly, we all need to be more concerned about the offenders that are out there that have never been caught and never had treatment.They are certainly much more of a risk that this 19 year old.
That's an awful lot of speculation.It may very well be that he was convicted at a younger age, was probated into that facility, and it was determined that he had not made enough progress to be released or transferred so probate was continued at the same facility so the continuity of treatment was not lost. A facility for juvenile sex offenders can legally keep their charges until the age of 21.
Just because I'm concerned about escapees that don't get reported doesn't mean I'm not concerned about offenders who haven't yet been caught. I'm concerned about both.
This 19-year-old is on the run, in a state where he's not familiar, and probably feeling desperate. He already has one conviction for violence. No one has any clue about where he went. Why shouldn't we be concerned?