The Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers...

[Steel X]

is coming to DVD on August 26th!

in either full screen or wide screen version.

I'm getting widescreen version anyway. :p

 

[Banjo]

Old News... very old news.

I'll be getting the extended version, not the regular version. It's coming out this fall.

I refuse to buy the regular one coming out next month.

 

[vvti low rolla]

aug 25, i saw it at blockbuster today when i rent phone booth.

 

[Banjo]

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (Widescreen Collector's Edition) (4 Discs)

November 18, 2003

This is the edition I will buy.

 

[Banjo]

Originally posted by vvti low rolla
aug 25, i saw it at blockbuster today when i rent phone booth.

Actually, August 26.

 

[vvti low rolla]

oh oh i forget to ask...since it's about lord of the rings...


what the hell is difference between the lord of the rings and the fellow of the rings? i read the mag and it said we should watch the fellow of the rings then watch part 2, but i have lord of the rings, would the story make sense if i watch part 2 from part one, not fellow of the rings?

 

[Ziusudra]

The Fellowship of the Rings is Part 1 of the Lord of the Rings book. You have to read the first part to be able to understand The Two Towers which is the 2nd part. The third part is the Return of the King which will explain everything IF you have read the 1st two IN ORDER.

Hope that helped.

Ziusudra

 

[Steel X]

Yep there are three big chapters in the story.

1. The Fellowship of The Ring (tells when and how the ring was made and found and stuff like that)

2. The Two Towers (tells that there are wars going on over a single ring)

3. The Return of The King (...would that be the same King who wore the ring...?)

 

[vvti low rolla]

i know, but my point is...would the story make sense if i plan watch part 2 when i finished watch part 1 (the lord of the rings) ? or should i watch the fellow of the rings first then watch part 2 two towers? is fellow of the rings very same to lord of the rings?

 

[Steel X]

uh yeah...

"fellowship of the ring" is just a chapter of the entire story that's all

same for other chapters

so no, it wouldn't make sense if you were watching "the two towers" first and then "the fellowship of the ring"...you are taking it backwards

it's better to go forward so the story would make more sense to you

 

[vvti low rolla]

ah, what part don't you understand, steel?

i said would the story make sense IF I WATCH PART 2 (FROM) part 1 that is "the lord of the rings" cause i have lord of the rings dvd and i saw other dvd called fellow of the rings. i read the movie mag and they suggust people to watch fellow of the rings FIRST then watch part 2, i said is fellow of the rings simple same to lord of the rings or different one? i rather not rent fellow of the rings and watch it, turn out it's same the dvd lord of the rings. waste my money.

 

[Steel X]

geez you are asking very weird questions and you whine that you don't get the answer you don't want to hear...

NO it wouldn't make sense if you watch part 2 from part 1...

and i don't know why you kept saying "fellow of the ring" when it's supposed to say "fellowship of the ring" and i don't think i even heard of that title...so whatever where you hear that, it's proably some retard writing stupid arctiles for other retards to read...

so if ''fellow of the ring" is any RELATED to lords of the rings trigoly, be my guest and watch it, even if it's not in order... :roll:

i don't know how and when and why you got that information

but "LOTR: fellowship of the ring" should be watched first and then "two towers" and of course "return of the king"...

but i don't know where you got "fellow of the ring"...

proably some VERY old movie or some crappy cartoon flick for the kiddies...

So anyway, they say that the LOTR movies are better than the novels...

 

[WonderBum]

Looking forward to watching Return of the King... when it shows in New Zealand. The lobby group I am leading is working hard to get regular captioned Movies into NZ.

Hope you love the scenary in the Movies, you come over and visit NZ someday to see "middle earth"

 

[vvti low rolla]

oh my fucking god, you stupid cunt, steel, it's fellowship of the ring, i ain't that movie whore fan like you are. i try say is fellowship of the ring and lord of the ring same movie or different? which one that i should watch before I WATCH two towers

 

[vvti low rolla]

yes it makes sense if i ask which one i should watch part 2 from part one which it means "which i should watch part 1 (there are 2 movies that has difference names the fellowship of the rings and lord of the rings) then i watch part 2"

 

[Stevey Boy]

Originally posted by vvti low rolla
oh my fucking god, you stupid cunt, steel, it's fellowship of the ring, i ain't that movie whore fan like you are. i try say is fellowship of the ring and lord of the ring same movie or different? which one that i should watch before I WATCH two towers

*spoiler alert*

















Fellowship is first part, but if you wanted to see the two towers then go watch fellowship first place because it was not over at the end of Fellowship and I assumed there will be more of the rest in Two Tower

Fellowship and Two Towers are part of "Lord of The Rings" triology so I guess it's same if you were trying to ask.

 

[Banjo]

The Hobbit (Prequel)
The Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

Now, is that the answer you were looking for?

The Lord of the Rings, they did make an animated movie based on the novel.

They cramped all three parts into one animated flick. It ran at 132 minutes. It was released back in 1978, but the reviews weren't pretty good to start with.

The animation are pretty awful though. But they also did make an animated feature based on The Hobbit too as well.

It was released back in 1977. It've been said to be oversimplified. But people has spoke out that this is superior to the Lord of the Rings animated film they released a year after this one.

 

[Steel X]

Originally posted by Stevey Boy
*spoiler alert*

















Fellowship is first part, but if you wanted to see the two towers then go watch fellowship first place because it was not over at the end of Fellowship and I assumed there will be more of the rest in Two Tower

Fellowship and Two Towers are part of "Lord of The Rings" triology so I guess it's same if you were trying to ask.

YES!!! THAT'S WHAT I'M FUCKIN' SAYING!

 

[Steel X]

Originally posted by vvti low rolla
oh my fucking god, you stupid cunt, steel, it's fellowship of the ring, i ain't that movie whore fan like you are. i try say is fellowship of the ring and lord of the ring same movie or different? which one that i should watch before I WATCH two towers

look, prick if you have a problem with the answers, then go fuck your head in the toilet and cry for begness of death.

 

[SilenceGold]

Drop the bashing here, please. We don't need to ruin a good movie thread here.

So far, I'm waiting for the 3rd part. I did like the two towers ending "look to the west and you will find me" scene.