sorry. the law and medical community disagree with you. You're an officer of laws. Why don't we stick with laws? The law says a fetus is not a viable being (meaning... it's not even medically and legally recognized as "baby" or a "person") until 28 weeks (more or less). So let's stick with law, shall we?
so why do you keep wasting your breath?
the source you gave me basically proved me right.let's not lie in here, shall we? second trimester is between 14 weeks and 26 weeks. According to Roe v Wade... viability is usually at 28 weeks and can be as early as 24 weeks. What you're telling me is that a fetus at 14 or 16 or 18 weeks is considered as viable. Very misleading, isn't it? Since you said, I quote - "I prefer accuracy"... then the real truth is.... a fetus may or may not be viable at or nearing end of second trimester but it is definitely considered as viable at third trimester.
yes.... only due to extenuating circumstance where it's a dire medical emergency.
because it's to prevent some states with similar belief like you from quibbling around and meddling with person's constitutional rights.
quibbling around, aren't we? and you are purposely lying to us and misleading us. According to your source and Roe v Wade... a person has a right to abortion until viability (which is typically around 28 weeks and can be as early as 24 weeks) and then of course... there may be a serious medical complication that would jeopardize a person's well-being and there are legal procedures and system in place where at least 2 physicians will have to approve abortion.
yea that's uh.... yea fascinating
Tell me why cops don't arrest abortion doctors for murder.
it's double standard for me but it's not for you when you say we're off-topic? very interesting. in case you didn't notice - look at Post #69 to see who started it first and look at Post #72 and #74 where I stated that I'm not even gonna go there because I knew it will go off-topic but no..... you guys just won't listen and stick with topic.
this is precisely why you guys lost the abortion argument at Supreme Court and continue to fail to convince Supreme Court otherwise for almost 40 years and counting. You guys are still incapable of sticking with facts and medical science to create a sound argument for Supreme Court. I'm sorry but using webster new college dictionary? absolutely comical at many levels.
again - feel free to create an abortion thread and we can continue discussing from there. why get all hissy and meanie in here like above? what's wrong with simply creating a new thread so that we can continue if you wish to?
