Shooting at Family Research Council HQ

Steinhauer

Steinhauer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
12,071
Reaction score
136
Hero guard shot thwarting attack at Family Research Council HQ | Fox News

A security guard at the Family Research Council's headquarters in Washington, D.C. is being hailed as a hero after he stopped a gunman posing as an intern, taking a bullet in the arm before wrestling the suspect to the ground.
Click to expand...

The suspect "made statements regarding their policies, and then opened fire with a gun striking a security guard," a source told Fox News. WJLA-TV7 reported the suspect was also shot. Sources also said the gunman may have been carrying a bag from Chick-fil-A, the embattled fast-food restaurant whose president came under fire from gay activists after he said he did not agree with same-sex marriage.
Click to expand...

Sources told Fox New that after guard took away his gun, the suspect said, "Don't shoot me, it was not about you, it was what this place stands for."
Click to expand...
 
Good job finding another anti-conservative nutcase to fan the flames of your culture war.
 
Great job to the security guard that tackled the suspect even after being shot and saved the day! At least this one is alive so maybe we can find out why! I'm afraid if all this shooting & killing doesn't stop real soon they are going to pass that crazy United Nations weapons ban! Then only criminals will have guns! Stop the madness!
 
airportcop said:
I'm afraid that he's not having to look too hard to find them! They are making it really easy! Sad!
Click to expand...

He (Stein) was the one that said party affiliation did not mean anything in these cases. Perhaps he was mistaken?

My viewpoint has not changed; he (the shooter) is another nutcase, regardless of his political views. He surely wasn't speaking for any Liberals I know.
 
Where have I stated party affiliation was important in this shooting? All I did was post links to articles about it.
 
saywhatkid said:
Good job finding another anti-conservative nutcase to fan the flames of your culture war.
Click to expand...
Now wait a minute. This is a news-worthy event. Steinhauer didn't create it or have to dig deep to find it. IT HAPPENED!

Thanks to the quick, brave actions of the guard and others, it didn't turn into a tragedy with multiple casualties.
 
saywhatkid said:
He (Stein) was the one that said party affiliation did not mean anything in these cases. Perhaps he was mistaken?

My viewpoint has not changed; he (the shooter) is another nutcase, regardless of his political views. He surely wasn't speaking for any Liberals I know.
Click to expand...
Steinhauer posted the story without editorial comment or personal opinions added. If you have any heartburn about the way the stories were written, you'll have to take it up with the source.
 
There are gay/lesbian teenagers committed suicide due to nasty bullying and some of them got killed by anti-gay people so FRC didn't support to pass the law to protect teenagers with different sex orientation. That's what FRC got paid for, IMO.

I have no respect to FRC at all and speaking about shooting, I'm out of this situation.
 
Foxrac said:
There are gay/lesbian teenagers committed suicide due to nasty bullying and some of them got killed by anti-gay people so FRC didn't support to pass the law to protect teenagers with different sex orientation. That's what FRC got paid for, IMO.

I have no respect to FRC at all and speaking about shooting, I'm out of this situation.
Click to expand...
There are many organizations or groups for whom I have no respect but I certainly don't want crazed gunmen attacking them. That solves nothing.
 
Reba said:
There are many organizations or groups for whom I have no respect but I certainly don't want crazed gunmen attacking them. That solves nothing.
Click to expand...

Yup, that's true.

I'm not applauded about FRC shooting because it will make a lot worse.

This shooter should think twice because he is going spend rest of his life in prison, even I'm sure about bullying is much worse at prison.
 
Reba said:
Steinhauer posted the story without editorial comment or personal opinions added. If you have any heartburn about the way the stories were written, you'll have to take it up with the source.
Click to expand...

the point is.... he picked the specific story because he agrees with the way it was written.
 
Jiro said:
the point is.... he picked the specific story because he agrees with the way it was written.
Click to expand...

Nope - I picked the story because it was the one being reported on.
Try again.

I did the same thing in the Texas A&M shooting.
 
Steinhauer said:
Nope - I picked the story because it was the one being reported on.
Try again.
Click to expand...
Yes that's what I just said. Same incident. Many stories. You're selectively-choosing an article which you agree with its language that says anything negative about liberals/democrats/leftists/etc.

Steinhauer said:
I did the same thing in the Texas A&M shooting.
Click to expand...
You made a very erroneous post. The shooting did not occur at Texas A&M.
 
Jiro said:
the point is.... he picked the specific story because he agrees with the way it was written.
Click to expand...
It doesn't really matter why he picked it. Regardless of who posted it, the story is newsworthy on its own. Can we move on to the topic itself?
 
Reba said:
It doesn't really matter why he picked it. Regardless of who posted it, the story is newsworthy on its own. Can we move on to the topic itself?
Click to expand...

Half of the story wasn't newsworthy and factoid. It was opinionated.
 
Back
Top