Huh?so this thread is correct - Palin's book is bogus
Huh?
Palin's publisher says the answer is simple: hard work. "When she resigned as governor, she had a lot more time and was able to really devote herself full-time to writing the book," says Tina Andreadis, a spokeswoman for HarperCollins. "That's really all that there is."
Name, rank, serial number. Do not volunteer any information.
I wouldn't know the answer to that one way or the other.the statement by her publisher was exaggerated and probably a lie. It is GW who did the "hard work" with full-time devotion, not Palin.


Ghostwriters are commonly used by politicians who submit their stories, history and other written or verbal materials. Nothing bogus about it. What's next? Requirement for greater transparency?
Personally, I see nothing wrong with using a ghostwriter as long as you are honest about it. It's the dishonesty that bothers me.
Am I the only one to think this, but if you met her in a dark alley, wouldn't you think her a hermophrodite?
Just wondering.
I had never really considered that, but you do have a point!
Link to support that allegation, please. And most people using a ghostwriter do not lie about the use of the ghostwriter. Palin, true to her colors, has continued in the vein of dishonest behavior that we have become accustomed to from her.
Is there a reason that you are so supportive of dishonesty?
Dishonest behavior? You mean like Obama, too?
Dishonest behavior? You mean like Obama, too?
so you're agreeing that Palin is dishonest.. thus her book is BOGUS.
Look at your post - "You mean like Obama, too?" By saying that, Palin is a liar like Obama too.How so?
no. have you?Have you read it?
Look at your post - "You mean like Obama, too?" By saying that, Palin is a liar like Obama too.
no. have you?
But you said Palin's book is bogus. As in untrue? How do you know?
I'm waiting for her book. So?