Palin denounces anonymous critics as 'cowardly'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jiro said:
I would think a person like you should sit down and stfu. You kept repeatedly bringing up about her Ph.D status. What's the matter? Game got too hard for you?
Click to expand...
No.

Jiro said:
huh? sounds like you've been watching FOX's dubbed/edited version of Palin interviews. :roll:
Click to expand...
I don't get Fox News.

Jiro said:
Youtube it. Google it. Her gaffes are not even a silly innocent mistake like asking a wheelchair person to stand up. It's a RED FLAG - it's called INCOMPETENCE! It showed that she has ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE what or how the federal government works. and I thought Obama was an inexperienced fool. :roll:
Click to expand...
You haven't proven anything. See my previous posts.
 
Jiro said:
yes :mad2:
Click to expand...
Calm down there, internet tough guy. This is not hard for me. I don't see why that makes you mad.

Jiro said:
sounds like you are.
Click to expand...
I don't have cable and I rarely visit the Fox News website.

Jiro said:
neither have you. you proved jack shit on your claim. See previous news/interviews/etc.
Click to expand...
Why don't you tell me exactly what my claim is. I want to make sure I've communicated it clearly here so you understand it.
 
Looks like my original assessment was correct. "Sore looser.":lol:
 
Hear Again said:
I'm not surprised. What else do you expect her to say? Just because Palin claims those statements are false doesn't mean that they are. After all, she doesn't want to look any more ignorant than she already does.
Click to expand...
Just because some anonymous person says it happened doesn't make it true either.

It used to be that reputable media wouldn't even print anything from "anonymous" sources because they had no veracity.
 
Anyone bother to watch her news conference today? That certainly isn't anonymous. The analysis, also not anonymous, wasn't what one would call "flattering."
 
BradB08 said:
Can you blame them for likely thinking that she's a ditz and not a credible candidate?
Click to expand...
Even if the press believed that they aren't supposed to show their bias in their news reports. Opinions belong on the editorial page.

And why is Caribou Barbie still in the news anyway?
Click to expand...
You got me. I thought the election was over.
 
Granted, she's not evil. She just has political views that are too uncomfortable for most Americans.
 
Reba said:
Even if the press believed that they aren't supposed to show their bias in their news reports. Opinions belong on the editorial page.


You got me. I thought the election was over.
Click to expand...

Palin is in the news because she's continuing to give interviews. Just the other day she appeared on Larry King, so it's apparent that she's still craving the media spotlight.
 
Reba said:
Just because some anonymous person says it happened doesn't make it true either.

It used to be that reputable media wouldn't even print anything from "anonymous" sources because they had no veracity.
Click to expand...

But you see Reba, Palin is proving otherwise. 99% of the claims made by the media as to what Palin said are true and proven because they have been taped. Just look on YouTube and you'll find plenty of evidence.
 
jillio said:
Anyone bother to watch her news conference today? That certainly isn't anonymous. The analysis, also not anonymous, wasn't what one would call "flattering."
Click to expand...

Good point. I missed her news conference today. Can't say that I regret doing so either.
 
jillio said:
Yeah. I just happened to have CNN on and saw a repeat of it.
Click to expand...

Jillio,

I saw a rerun of Palin's news conference late last night. Plain and simple, it was a joke. According to CNN, it only lasted 11 minutes and there were only 4 questions asked of Palin during that time. The conference was cancelled early because of awkwardness. Hmmm. Why am I not surprised? :giggle:
 
Hear Again said:
Jillio,

I saw a rerun of Palin's news conference late last night. Plain and simple, it was a joke. According to CNN, it only lasted 11 minutes and there were only 4 questions asked of Palin during that time. The conference was cancelled early because of awkwardness. Hmmm. Why am I not surprised? :giggle:
Click to expand...

Yeppers. That was my whole point.:lol:
 
jillio said:
Yeppers. That was my whole point.:lol:
Click to expand...

Oh, okay. I didn't see the news conference, so didn't know what happened. It turned out to be an obvious waste of my time and I don't know why I watched it in the first place. I could have been doing something more constructive. :giggle:
 
Reba said:
Just because some anonymous person says it happened doesn't make it true either.

It used to be that reputable media wouldn't even print anything from "anonymous" sources because they had no veracity.
Click to expand...

True. Makes me wonder if the media is the fourth branch of the government. :lol:
 
Hear Again said:
Oh, okay. I didn't see the news conference, so didn't know what happened. It turned out to be an obvious waste of my time and I don't know why I watched it in the first place. I could have been doing something more constructive. :giggle:
Click to expand...

I had it on while I was working at the computer. The legend continues. My impression was, four years is certainly not long enough to bring this woman up to speed if she plans to run for office again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top