- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 144
And if we focus on the solution,there is no problem to deal with.:roll:
then that's utopia. a place with no problem....
And if we focus on the solution,there is no problem to deal with.:roll:
then that's utopia. a place with no problem....
Problems will always occur. It is the nature of life. However, solutions solve problems, rather than add to them.
If you are unwilling to be a part of the soultion, then you forfeit your right to bitch about the problems.
my part of the solution is the gun in my pantsI don't bitch. I shoot!
Then you are definately part of the problem.
<crying, run away to closet>![]()
That's not much of a solution,either.
violent crimes such as assaults are up though - fist and knife. You're thinking of murders. and plus - UK doesn't have the population with wide range of diversity of USA so that's not fair to compare USA to a country that's as big as USA's penis (Florida)![]()
They also have access to more comprehensive social programs that reduces the need to commit crime.
UK is actually quite diverse. Just not as stratified.
No, UK does have more diverse as USA does since crime issue isn't all matters, it's based on society.
USA has more murders per rate than in most part of Western Europe, Canada, Japan and Australia, gun restriction isn't always to cause like that, that what I said again.
You are really twisted up.
again - you're comparing a watermelon to grape in terms of size. If they have a a country as big as USA with many cities.... then talk to me. USA's societies and civilizations are spreaded out and there are wide varieties of different societies. For ie - a certain area in Mississippi is predominantly black with white cops. It's bound to have more racial-related crimes than a heavily-diversified society.
Faulty logic. Diversity statistics are decided on a per populace stance. The size of the country has nothing to do with percentages of diversity.
Why would a predominantly black area have more racial related crimes? I fail to see any logic in that remark.