NRA's new video game

I highly agree with this statement. People just want to associate anything with guns to the massacre. The shooting was with handguns, and the government calls for a law against rifles...

People drive and get killed all the time, should Grand Theft Auto be scrutinized too? What about Halo 4? Black Ops II? I shoot people all the time in that game. Doesn't mean I'm gonna go on a killing spree.

In bold - it is unnecessary and I don't believe that violent games make people's behavior so violent, except for anybody with mental issue like schizophrenia should be discouraged.

I played violent games since when I was little kid like Doom in 1993 and didn't have any effect on my behavior.
 
Right, I totally agree. But some people get their panties in a bunch over a GAME or a movie that involves violence.
 
In bold - it is unnecessary and I don't believe that violent games make people's behavior so violent, except for anybody with mental issue like schizophrenia should be discouraged.

I played violent games since when I was little kid like Doom in 1993 and didn't have any effect on my behavior.

I play black ops and skyrim, I'm on the verge of becoming a serial killer. Lol

The problem ain't the games, it's the certain folks who play them that have psychotic personalities or something different about them. Give the game to the wrong hands and it can influence them. It's the same thing with guns.
 
In bold - it is unnecessary and I don't believe that violent games make people's behavior so violent, except for anybody with mental issue like schizophrenia should be discouraged.

I played violent games since when I was little kid like Doom in 1993 and didn't have any effect on my behavior.

Not to be rude, (again, dont take this the wrong way) but you started a thread a while back about having some issues. Maybe those were caused by the games and you didn't realize it. Something to think about. :dunno:
 
So moral of the story, if you have a child who seems a bit off, let them watch Sesame Street instead. Haha
 
Also no more knives since that can be used to kill people too. We should all use our hands to tear our steaks apart.

well - let me make an even more accurate comparison.

there's no reason for people to have F1 cars because it's not safe.
there's no reason for people to have moonshine because it's not safe.
there's no reason for people to have machine guns because it's not safe.

.... and there's no reason for hollywood and companies to pervert Amendment One by producing the most disgusting, goriest, and violent movie/game as they can....

so what point do we draw a line for how violent, goriest, bloodiest a game can get?
 
So basically no fun video games for ANYBODY, because crazies exist in this world? We should also stop giving out driver licenses and making cars since SOME people like to drink and drive and kill others.
I am not an alcoholic but many people are.
I am not a drug addict but many people are.
I am not a gambling addict but many people are.

so what point am I making? you and I may not have a biological or psychological tendency to addiction or violence but many people are and it's a serious problem.
 
I am not an alcoholic but many people are.
I am not a drug addict but many people are.
I am not a gambling addict but many people are.

so what point am I making? you and I may not have a biological or psychological tendency to addiction or violence but many people are and it's a serious problem.

There will always be people with problems. Video games or not, they will be violent if they want to. We can't just shelter EVERYBODY. It's for entertainment, and the first amendment protects that.

It's obviously you believe in bigger government, I'm sorry I just cannot agree with you.
 
Right, I totally agree. But some people get their panties in a bunch over a GAME or a movie that involves violence.

teams of highly-acclaimed psychologists and experts plus dozens of independent studies & experiments from all around the world disagree.
 
There will always be people with problems. Video games or not, they will be violent if they want to. We can't just shelter EVERYBODY. It's for entertainment, and the first amendment protects that.

It's obviously you believe in bigger government, I'm sorry I just cannot agree with you.

by your logic.... so you're saying it's ok for people to preach hate and violence like KKK? and you're ok with people abusing our First Amendment?

I do not believe in bigger government and I abhor it but I do believe in regulation if needed when people are too stupid to regulate themselves and causing harm to public and to themselves. that can be done even with smaller government.

it's not government's fault for coming to this point. they were forced to do it.
 
So we should ban alcohol and casinos because some people abuse it? No. We can't protect everybody. That's not ever going to happen. There's always going to be some things that just aren't good for people. It's no reason to ban them. Hey I believe if you want to do drugs and ruin your own life, be my guest. If you don't want to wear a seatbelt, that's your choice.
 
Why would I believe in violence from the KKK? That's ridiculous. People who preach hate are annoying as hell (such as the Westboro baptist church) but being stupid isn't illegal (unfortunately)
 
Last edited:
So in what way don't you agree with bigger government? More government control = bigger government.
 
So we should ban alcohol and casinos because some people abuse it? No. We can't protect everybody. That's not ever going to happen. There's always going to be some things that just aren't good for people. It's no reason to ban them.
I don't believe in ban and I've never said anything about banning. Instead of banning... we regulate.

Hey I believe if you want to do drugs and ruin your own life, be my guest. If you don't want to wear a seatbelt, that's your choice.
sounds like you'd be happy living in a lawless country where it's every man for himself.

just don't forget - a death impacts other people. if a father wants to drink himself to death or jump out of bridge, don't forget that this impacts all family members and friends and they have to pay for it and suffer. it is our moral calling
 
I don't believe in ban and I've never said anything about banning. Instead of banning... we regulate.


sounds like you'd be happy living in a lawless country where it's every man for himself.

just don't forget - a death impacts other people. if a father wants to drink himself to death or jump out of bridge, don't forget that this impacts all family members and friends and they have to pay for it and suffer. it is our moral calling

TV is already pretty regulated. Video games should be at the parents discrepancy. Unfortunately, not everyone's a good parent.

And yeah I'm pretty much a libertarian. But I totally understand your point. I just don't like the fact of a government controlling everything. If I want to smoke till my lungs fall off, then that's my perogative. Not that I do, just saying. People need to care about themselves more, instead of having the government do that for them. (Like the law against no large sodas in New York....that's so ridiculous) next thing you know is a regulation on what size meal you can eat.
 
So in what way don't you agree with bigger government? More government control = bigger government.

not necessarily.

this is a fluidic country with fluidic government system. if there's a problem, we address it as needed with an appropriate solution for that time.

ie - slavery was acceptable and legal in the past. and slavery is now unacceptable and illegal.

so there's a problem within our society and we will address it. don't like it? feel free to claim a land and be the Lord of the Flies.
 
TV is already pretty regulated. Video games should be at the parents discrepancy. Unfortunately, not everyone's a good parent.

And yeah I'm pretty much a libertarian. But I totally understand your point. I just don't like the fact of a government controlling everything. If I want to smoke till my lungs fall off, then that's my perogative. Not that I do, just saying. People need to care about themselves more, instead of having the government do that for them. (Like the law against no large sodas in New York....that's so ridiculous) next thing you know is a regulation on what size meal you can eat.

so you would like it if the government backs off and let the industry do whatever it wants and however it wants? such as..... no FDA regulation and restriction on cigarettes and sodas and trust the industry to do the right thing?
 
Why would I believe in violence from the KKK? That's ridiculous. People who preach hate are annoying as hell (such as the Westboro baptist church) but being stupid isn't illegal (unfortunately)

I'm not saying you believe in violence from the KKK. I'm saying you should be very careful of what you wish for because you believe that we cannot and should not shelter everybody and First Amendment this, First Amendment that.

By your logic... while KKK preaches racism and bigotry which encourages and incites people to take action by any means including violence... you're saying that we should do nothing because of First Amendment and all we can do is just shrug and arrest people for assault, murder, vandalism, or rape. That's what you want, am I right?


btw - please use the QUOTE button so that we know what & who you're referring to.
 
Back
Top