jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 19
I agree. I don't think it's a solution for real life, unfortunately. However, I did say food for thought. Just something to think about. If the answer is "history would dramatically change", why? What makes us vote differently in those two scenarios 1) The way we do it now and 2) Properly informed voting?
In properly informed voting, I would think that the voter would have thought the solution to the problem he wants addressed all the way through and determined whether the course of action is even viable. That, most definately, would change history!:P