Bush monkey portrait sparks protests

Vance

New Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
4,265
Reaction score
1
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A portrait of President George W. Bush (news - web sites) using monkeys to form his image has led to the closure of a New York art exhibition over the weekend and anguished protests over freedom of expression.

"Bush Monkeys," a small acrylic on canvas by Chris Savido, created the stir at the Chelsea Market public space, leading the market's managers to close down the 60-piece show that was scheduled to stay up for the next month.

The show featured art from the upcoming issue of Animal Magazine, a quarterly publication featuring emerging artists.

"We had tons of people, like more than 2,000 people show up for the opening on Thursday night," said show organizer Bucky Turco. "Then this manager saw the piece and the guy just kind of flipped out. 'The show is over. Get this work down or I'm gonna arrest you,' he said. It's been kind of wild."

Turco took the show down on Saturday and moved the art work to his small downtown Animal Gallery. Calls to the management of Chelsea Market for comment were not returned.

From afar, the painting offers a likeness of Bush, but when you get closer you see the image is made up of chimpanzees or monkeys swimming in a marsh.

Savido, 23, said he was surprised by the strong reaction to his painting, listed in the catalogue at $3,500 (1,820 pounds).

"It seems like people got a kick out of it," Savido said. "When they really see it, they almost do a double-take. I like to get a reaction from people."

The Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-bred artist said he was happy for all the attention paid to his work but said the decision to shutter the exhibit was "a blatant act of censorship."

Savido plans to auction the painting and donate proceeds to an organization dedicated to freedom of expression.

"This is much deeper than art. This is fundamental American rights, freedom of speech," Savido said. "To see that something like this can happen, especially in a place like New York City is mind boggling and scary."

Source: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/nm/20041213/od_uk_nm/oukoe_arts_monkeys

ra3045613533.jpg



Classic! I would love to buy that one myself. But what I understand from some of AD'ers were saying that we actually do have the freedom of speech, we can draw or say whatever we want yet these people protest about it. I am like ... HUH?

Now putting aside the sarcasm, I think it is quite cool. It is very unique. I am a art freak. I love to look at the pictures and construct the feelings & thoughts toward any pictures.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps most of the protesters didn't like the idea of having a President's (whether they like him or not) image portrayed as one 'monkeying' around expressedly so by being exhibited in an art show....I do admire great accomplishments and feats by talented artist and with this particular piece of this artist's rendition, I am not one to be crying afoul after seeing this piece of art, although perhaps if the artist would have choosen an entirely different subject which wouldn't have drawn such a public outburst...and then again, the title might be immaturely or improperly named which also may be coming across in a distasteful manner as well....
 
I really don't understand why they closed the show. I see no reason to cancel the show unless there is more to the story that I don't know about.

It is not a painting I would hang in my living room, but I see no reason to censor it.
 
With the way the business society is treating Bush, I see that America is at the stepping stone toward right-wing dictatorship.

Richard
 
I think that Bush is already monkeying around with our lives. :roll:
 
Nesmuth said:
With the way the business society is treating Bush, I see that America is at the stepping stone toward right-wing dictatorship.

Richard
I disagree. It is more likely opposite. With the way Bush treat free-thinking people, I can see that America is at the stepping stone toward right-wing dictatorship.

During Clinton's era, republicans were trying to find every way to make him look ridiculous in White House so why there should be any different for Bush? Hmm? Sort of 'An eye for an eye' stuff.

Edit: When republicans do that to Bill Clinton, all I do is laughing. It is freedom of speech after all... right? When we did that, it is not freedom of speech. It is very odd.
 
Last edited:
Magatsu said:
During Clinton's era, republicans were trying to find every way to make him look ridiculous in White House ...
It didn't really require much effort; Clinton's choices in women made it very easy. ;)
 
Back
Top