Bush: Bad Data Means Stop Publishing

Vance

New Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
4,265
Reaction score
1
Interesting. If Bush don't like the hard facts or reality, know what he do? Hide the facts from the public. Maybe he needs to pray bit harder to make the reality go away? Ok, ok.. enough with sarcasms, let me post the article:


President Bush has said that "in a society that is a free society, there will be transparency." That means that in America, we have a government where the public gets to see as much information as possible about its government.

- Knight-Ridder reports today that the Bush administration announced yesterday that it has "decided to stop publishing an annual report on international terrorism after the government's top terrorism center concluded that there were more terrorist attacks in 2004 than in any year since 1985, the first year the publication covered."

- When unemployment was peaking in Bush's first term, the White House tried to stop publishing the Labor Department's regular report on mass layoffs.

- In 2003, when the nation's governors came to Washington to complain about inadequate federal funding for the states, the Bush administration decided to stop publishing the budget report that states use to see what money they are, or aren't, getting.

- In 2003, the National Council for Research on Women found that information about discrimination against women has gone missing from government Web sites, including 25 reports from the U.S. Department of Labor's Women's Bureau.

- In 2002, Democrats uncovered evidence that the Bush administration was removing health information from government websites. Specifically, the administration deleted data showing that abortion does not increase the risk of breast cancer. That scientific data was seen by the White House as a direct affront to the pro-life movement.

Source: http://www.davidsirota.com/2005/04/bush-bad-data-means-stop-publishing.html


Huge thanks to MrReality (PC member) and David Sirota. As always, reality is on our side ;]

after the government's top terrorism center concluded that there were more terrorist attacks in 2004 than in any year since 1985

Indeed. Bush's policies only encourage more terrorisms. Naturally.
 
WHY DOES HE EVEN BOTHER BEING PRESIDENT AGAIN?!!? :roll:
 
Steel said:
WHY DOES HE EVEN BOTHER BEING PRESIDENT AGAIN?!!? :roll:
In the game of chess, Stupidity said to Intellectual: "Checkmate". So Stupidity won :(

Banjo said:
Look here, even Michelle Malkin was on Bush's case! I know it's not related to the terrorism reports...

But it appears that the Bush admin has ordered some people to refrain from being interviewed by investigators.

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/002092.htm
:D :D :D :D :D Even though I dislike her perspections but she made my day! Watergate II? I hope so!
 
Magatsu said:
- Knight-Ridder reports today that the Bush administration announced yesterday that it has "decided to stop publishing an annual report on international terrorism after the government's top terrorism center concluded that there were more terrorist attacks in 2004 than in any year since 1985, the first year the publication covered."
The number of serious international terrorist incidents more than tripled last year, according to U.S. government figures, a sharp upswing in deadly attacks that the State Department has decided not to make public in its annual report on terrorism due to Congress this week.

Overall, the number of what the U.S. government considers "significant" attacks grew to about 655 last year, up from the record of around 175 in 2003, according to congressional aides who were briefed on statistics covering incidents including the bloody school seizure in Russia and violence related to the disputed Indian territory of Kashmir [...] "Last year was bad. This year is worse. They are deliberately trying to withhold data because it shows that as far as the war on terrorism internationally, we're losing," said Larry C. Johnson, a former senior State Department counterterrorism official, who first revealed the decision not to publish the data.
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content//article/2005/04/26/AR2005042601623.html


Tripled. No wonder why Bush Admin wants to hide the datas that they don't like.
 
Back
Top