- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,899
- Reaction score
- 1,518
I don't want to "argue" with you. I'm not challenging you. I'm challenging the "law". I'm politely requesting the link so I can read the exact legal wording of this law.You are from SC, that's not under 9th Ninth Circuit, it has been passed in 2002 or so...
Move to west coast and find out yourself.
It has been done for numerous time since new policies are enforced on us about not tell under "God" when pledge on US flags, that already banned since I know about it. I asked my teacher and she said under "God" is banned in all public school, that where located in 9th Ninth Circuit and that already banned to do that. I had been graduated at high school that under 9th Ninth Circuit, also Boult already know...
All new law are applied on public school except for state or private school since Boult told me that Arizona School for the Deaf is allowing them to do that, that student's choice.
FYI, I'm not going argue with you since you aren't from 9th Ninth Circuit or so.
The only recent ruling on the Pledge that I remember or could find was this:
Supreme Court Dismisses Pledge Case on Technicality
Justices Do Not Decide Constitutionality of Reference to God in Pledge of Allegiance
By William Branigin and Charles Lane
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, June 14, 2004; 1:30 PM
The Supreme Court ruled today that a California atheist did not have the legal standing to challenge the constitutionality of the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, dismissing on procedural grounds a lower court's ruling in his favor but sidestepping the broader question of whether the pledge itself is constitutional.
The ruling effectively preserved the phrase "one nation under God" that is recited daily as part of the pledge by millions of schoolchildren across the country.
But by basing the decision on a procedural issue, the Supreme Court left open the prospect that a challenge to the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance could come up again....
Supreme Court Dismisses Pledge Case on Technicality (washingtonpost.com)
Do you have information more recent than this?